Elections: Election Day holiday: voting by mail.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 13 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 13.
You're tracking AB 13
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 13 — Elections: Election Day holiday: voting by mail.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the statewide general election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each even-numbered year. Existing law designates specific days as holidays in this state. This bill would add the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of any even-numbered year to the list of state holidays. By increasing the duties of local officials in connection with the creation of a new state holiday, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter for all elections, as provided. Existing law authorizes any county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election if certain requirements are met. This bill would repeal the provisions requiring county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter and authorizing a county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election. The bill would instead authorize a voter to request a vote by mail ballot for any election, as specified. The bill would also authorize a voter to apply to become a permanent vote by mail voter, in which case the voter would receive a vote by mail ballot for every election. (3) Existing law authorizes a voter who is unable to return their ballot to designate any other person to return the ballot, as specified. This bill would restrict the persons a voter may authorize to return the voter's ballot to only the voter's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or a person residing in the same household as the voter. (4) Under existing law, a ballot is timely cast if it is received by the elections official no later than 7 days after election day and postmarked on or before election day. This bill would reduce the deadline for receiving a ballot to 3 days after election day. (5) This bill would make various conforming and clarifying changes. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/26/23 - Amended Assembly Current pdf January 26, 2023
- Introduced 12/05/22 - Introduced pdf December 05, 2022
- AB13 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Reconsideration refused.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ELECTIONS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on ELECTIONS and G.O.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Essayli · Primary
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
- Diane Dixon · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
- Kate Sanchez · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Essayli
Co-sponsors (7)
- Davies, Laurie Republican
- Dixon, Diane Republican
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Patterson, Joe Republican
- Sanchez, Kate Republican
- Waldron
- Dahle, Megan Republican
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Essayli | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Nay |
| Pellerin, Gail | Democratic | Nay |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 38% | 13% | 0% | 50% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Essayli | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Nay |
| Pellerin, Gail | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 13 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the statewide general election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each even-numbered year. Existing law designates specific days as holidays in this state. This bill would add the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of any even-numbered year to the list of state holidays. By increasing the duties of local officials in connection with the creation of a new state holiday, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter for all elections, as provided. Existing law authorizes any county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election if certain requirements are met. This bill would repeal the provisions requiring county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter and authorizing a county to conduct an all-mailed ballot election. The bill would instead authorize a voter to request a vote by mail ballot for any election, as specified. The bill would also authorize a voter to apply to become a permanent vote by mail voter, in which case the voter would receive a vote by mail ballot for every election. (3) Existing law authorizes a voter who is unable to return their ballot to designate any other person to return the ballot, as specified. This bill would restrict the persons a voter may authorize to return the voter's ballot to only the voter's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or a person residing in the same household as the voter. (4) Under existing law, a ballot is timely cast if it is received by the elections official no later than 7 days after election day and postmarked on or before election day. This bill would reduce the deadline for receiving a ballot to 3 days after election day. (5) This bill would make various conforming and clarifying changes. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 13?
- AB 13 is sponsored by Essayli, Davies, Laurie (Republican), Dixon, Diane (Republican), Flora, Heath (Republican), Patterson, Joe (Republican), Sanchez, Kate (Republican), Waldron, and Dahle, Megan (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 13?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 13?
- Track AB 13 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 13
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 13
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →