California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 1069 — State grant programs: negotiated cost rate agreements.

Last action — August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Department of General Services in the Government Operations Agency for purposes of providing centralized services of state government. Existing law establishes various state grant programs. This bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, the Department of General Services to establish, by July 1, 2023, a state standard negotiated cost agreement for awarding state grants that are created on or after July 1, 2023, to grantees that do not have an existing negotiated indirect cost rate agreement and cost allocation policy approved by the federal government. The bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, any state grant program that is created on or after January 1, 2023, to require the state agency or other state entity administering the grant to use the same terms as contained in the grantee's existing negotiated indirect cost rate agreements and cost allocation policies approved by the federal government. The bill would require a state agency or other state entity administering those programs to use, commencing on and after July 1, 2023, the same terms as contained in the grantee's state standard negotiated cost agreement. The bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, these state agencies or other state entities to authorize a grantee that is a nonprofit organization and that does not have an existing federal negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or existing state standard negotiated cost agreement to instead be compensated for indirect costs pursuant to specified methods.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. August 11 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  2. August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.

  5. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3933.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  7. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3782.) (May 19).

  10. Set for hearing May 19.

  11. May 16 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  12. Set for hearing May 16.

  13. May 9 hearing postponed by committee.

  14. Set for hearing May 9.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3511.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  18. Set for hearing April 26.

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  20. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and E.Q.

  21. From printer.

  22. Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Special Consent SB1069

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22001
Democratic 13000
Republican 4000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Pan — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Min — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bates — Yea
Newman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Portantino — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bates — Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4001
Republican 1000
Democratic 1000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Kamlager — Yea
Bates — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Environmental Quality] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 9002
Republican 1000
Total 13002
% of votes cast 87%0%0%13%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Melendez — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1069 do?
Existing law establishes the Department of General Services in the Government Operations Agency for purposes of providing centralized services of state government. Existing law establishes various state grant programs. This bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, the Department of General Services to establish, by July 1, 2023, a state standard negotiated cost agreement for awarding state grants that are created on or after July 1, 2023, to grantees that do not have an existing negotiated indirect cost rate agreement and cost allocation policy approved by the federal government. The bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, any state grant program that is created on or after January 1, 2023, to require the state agency or other state entity administering the grant to use the same terms as contained in the grantee's existing negotiated indirect cost rate agreements and cost allocation policies approved by the federal government. The bill would require a state agency or other state entity administering those programs to use, commencing on and after July 1, 2023, the same terms as contained in the grantee's state standard negotiated cost agreement. The bill would require, to the extent possible and permitted by federal law, these state agencies or other state entities to authorize a grantee that is a nonprofit organization and that does not have an existing federal negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or existing state standard negotiated cost agreement to instead be compensated for indirect costs pursuant to specified methods.
Who sponsors SB 1069?
SB 1069 is sponsored by Umberg, Thomas J. (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 1069?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1069?
Track SB 1069 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1069

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1069

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →