State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: electric and zero-emission vehicles: chargi...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1015 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1015.
You're tracking SB 1015
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1015 — State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: electric and zero-emission vehicles: charging and refueling infrastructure: ports.
Last action — May 19 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, working with specified state entities, to prepare a statewide assessment of the electric vehicle charging infrastructure needed to support the levels of electric vehicle adoption required to meet the goals of putting at least 5,000,000 zero-emission vehicles in service by 2030 and of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Existing law requires that the assessment expand on the commission's electric vehicle infrastructure projections to consider all necessary charging infrastructure, all vehicle categories, road, highway, and off-road electrification, port and airport electrification, and other programs to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles to meet those goals, and examine existing and future infrastructure needs throughout California, including in low-income communities. This bill would specify that the assessment's examination of existing and future infrastructure needs throughout California also includes the needs of communities affected by port operations, including port operations at the busiest commercial land port of entry in the state. This bill would require the commission, for purposes of supporting the reduction of vehicle emissions associated with the state's commercial port operations, to allocate certain moneys for purposes of deploying light-, medium-, and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicle charging and refueling infrastructure to the state's commercial ports, including the busiest commercial land port of entry in the state.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/04/22 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 04, 2022
- Amended 03/15/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 15, 2022
- Introduced 02/14/22 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2022
- SB1015 View text html
Action History
-
May 19 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
May 16 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 3. Page 3521.) (April 26).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3414.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Set for hearing April 26 in TRANS. pending receipt.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on E., U. & C. and TRANS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hueso · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hueso
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 18% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1015 do?
- Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, working with specified state entities, to prepare a statewide assessment of the electric vehicle charging infrastructure needed to support the levels of electric vehicle adoption required to meet the goals of putting at least 5,000,000 zero-emission vehicles in service by 2030 and of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. Existing law requires that the assessment expand on the commission's electric vehicle infrastructure projections to consider all necessary charging infrastructure, all vehicle categories, road, highway, and off-road electrification, port and airport electrification, and other programs to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles to meet those goals, and examine existing and future infrastructure needs throughout California, including in low-income communities. This bill would specify that the assessment's examination of existing and future infrastructure needs throughout California also includes the needs of communities affected by port operations, including port operations at the busiest commercial land port of entry in the state. This bill would require the commission, for purposes of supporting the reduction of vehicle emissions associated with the state's commercial port operations, to allocate certain moneys for purposes of deploying light-, medium-, and heavy-duty zero-emission vehicle charging and refueling infrastructure to the state's commercial ports, including the busiest commercial land port of entry in the state.
- Who sponsors SB 1015?
- SB 1015 is sponsored by Hueso.
- What is the current status of SB 1015?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1015?
- Track SB 1015 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1015
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1015
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →