California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 930 — Alcoholic beverages: hours of sale.

Last action — Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Haney.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2025, and before January 2, 2028, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city that would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. on weekends and specified holidays, and between the hours of 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. on all other days upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hour without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to the Cities of Palm Springs and West Hollywood and the City and County of San Francisco. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Haney.

  2. Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 25. Noes 31. Page 6201.)

  3. Ordered to third reading.

  4. Read third time and amended.

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (August 11).

  8. August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  11. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 3644.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3544.) (April 27).

  16. Set for hearing April 27.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  18. Referred to Com. on HOUSING.

  19. From printer.

  20. Joint Rule 55 suspended. (Ayes 31. Noes 6. Page 2880.)

  21. (Ayes 31. Noes 6.)

  22. Art. IV. Sec. 8(a) of the Constitution dispensed with.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 17 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Haney

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 25 Yea · 31 Nay · 24 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1215012
Democratic 138011
Republican 0801
Total 2531024
% of votes cast 31%39%0%30%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Ting — Yea
Low — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Friedman — Nay
Cooley — Nay
Villapudua — Nay
Salas — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Rodriguez — Nay
O'Donnell — Nay
Levine — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Medina — Nay
McCarty — Nay
Smith — Nay
Cooper — Nay
Mathis — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Holden — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Nazarian — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Gray — Not Voting
Cunningham — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Not Voting
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Alvarez, David Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Nay
Bennett, Steve Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Nay
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Not Voting
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Not Voting
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Nay
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Nay
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Not Voting
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 2 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 5002
Unaffiliated 4201
Republican 0002
Total 9205
% of votes cast 56%13%0%31%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Quirk — Yea
Holden — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Levine — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Vince Fong — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 4 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5203
Democratic 7101
Republican 0102
Total 12406
% of votes cast 55%18%0%27%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Wood — Yea
Low — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Smith — Nay
Cooper — Not Voting
Daly — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Ramos, James C. Democratic Nay
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Davies, Laurie Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 31 Yea · 0 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18005
Republican 2002
Democratic 11002
Total 31009
% of votes cast 78%0%0%23%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Leyva — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Min — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Newman — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Roth — Not Voting
Wilk — Not Voting
Bates — Not Voting
Pan — Not Voting
Glazer — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Not Voting
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 930 do?
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2025, and before January 2, 2028, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city that would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. on weekends and specified holidays, and between the hours of 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. on all other days upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hour without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to the Cities of Palm Springs and West Hollywood and the City and County of San Francisco. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.
Who sponsors SB 930?
SB 930 is sponsored by Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic) and Haney.
What is the current status of SB 930?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 930?
Track SB 930 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 930

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 930

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →