Automated license plate recognition systems: information sharing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2192 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2192.
You're tracking AB 2192
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2192 — Automated license plate recognition systems: information sharing.
Last action — In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Department of the California Highway Patrol to retain license plate data captured by license plate reader technology for not more than 60 days unless the data is being used as evidence or for the investigation of felonies, and to share that data with law enforcement agencies for specified purposes. With regard to information from automated license plate recognition (ALPR) systems, existing law requires an ALPR operator and an ALPR end-user, as those terms are defined, to implement a usage and privacy policy, as specified, and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices. Existing law prohibits a public agency, as defined, from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information, as specified, except to another public agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law. This bill would additionally prohibit a public agency from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information to a law enforcement agency of the federal government or another state, unless the ALPR information is being sold, shared, or transferred to locate a vehicle or person reasonably suspected of being involved in the commission of a public offense, and only as otherwise permitted by law. Existing law, the California Values Act, prohibits a California law enforcement agency from, among other things, using agency or department moneys or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified. This bill would prohibit a public agency, ALPR operator, or ALPR end-user from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information if that sale, sharing, or transferring would violate a provision of the California Values Act, or if the information would be sold, shared, or transferred to a state that has enacted laws that limit access to abortion, as specified, or a state that is subject to the state-funded and state-sponsored travel ban on states that have enacted specified laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/29/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 29, 2022
- Introduced 02/15/22 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2022
- AB2192 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- James C. Ramos · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ramos, James C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 0% | 0% | 40% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2192 do?
- Existing law authorizes the Department of the California Highway Patrol to retain license plate data captured by license plate reader technology for not more than 60 days unless the data is being used as evidence or for the investigation of felonies, and to share that data with law enforcement agencies for specified purposes. With regard to information from automated license plate recognition (ALPR) systems, existing law requires an ALPR operator and an ALPR end-user, as those terms are defined, to implement a usage and privacy policy, as specified, and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices. Existing law prohibits a public agency, as defined, from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information, as specified, except to another public agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law. This bill would additionally prohibit a public agency from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information to a law enforcement agency of the federal government or another state, unless the ALPR information is being sold, shared, or transferred to locate a vehicle or person reasonably suspected of being involved in the commission of a public offense, and only as otherwise permitted by law. Existing law, the California Values Act, prohibits a California law enforcement agency from, among other things, using agency or department moneys or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified. This bill would prohibit a public agency, ALPR operator, or ALPR end-user from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR information if that sale, sharing, or transferring would violate a provision of the California Values Act, or if the information would be sold, shared, or transferred to a state that has enacted laws that limit access to abortion, as specified, or a state that is subject to the state-funded and state-sponsored travel ban on states that have enacted specified laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
- Who sponsors AB 2192?
- AB 2192 is sponsored by Ramos, James C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2192?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2192?
- Track AB 2192 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2192
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2192
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →