Restraining orders: ex parte.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2936 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2936.
You're tracking AB 2936
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2936 — Restraining orders: ex parte.
Last action — From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law governs the issuance of, and notice and hearings regarding, an ex parte temporary restraining order. Existing law limits the circumstances when a court may grant a temporary restraining order without notice to the respondent, as specified. Existing law requires a hearing to be held on a petition for an ex parte restraining order within 21 days, or, if good cause appears to the court, 25 days from the date that a temporary restraining order is granted or denied. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the above-described provision.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/18/22 - Introduced Current pdf February 18, 2022
- AB2936 View text html
Action History
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Cunningham · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cunningham
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2936 do?
- Existing law governs the issuance of, and notice and hearings regarding, an ex parte temporary restraining order. Existing law limits the circumstances when a court may grant a temporary restraining order without notice to the respondent, as specified. Existing law requires a hearing to be held on a petition for an ex parte restraining order within 21 days, or, if good cause appears to the court, 25 days from the date that a temporary restraining order is granted or denied. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the above-described provision.
- Who sponsors AB 2936?
- AB 2936 is sponsored by Cunningham.
- What is the current status of AB 2936?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2936?
- Track AB 2936 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2936
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2936
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →