California 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1011 — Alcoholic beverages.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 136, Statutes of 2022.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2022. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages and the granting of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. Existing law establishes limitations on the number of on-sale general licenses that may be issued by the department based on the population of the county in which the licensed premises are located, as provided. Existing law provides an exception to the license limitation for a county of the 6th class, as specified, for 5 new original neighborhood-restricted special on-sale general licenses for premises located within specified census tracts in that county, subject to specified requirements. This bill would specify that the above-described census tracts correspond to those identified within the 2010 Census. (2) Existing law prohibits any licensee from giving any premium, gift, or free goods in connection with the sale or distribution of any alcoholic beverage, but permits alcoholic beverages to be provided in consumer contests and sweepstakes subject to specified conditions. Existing law permits the department to issue a special temporary on-sale or off-sale beer or wine license to certain nonprofit corporations that entitles the licensee to sell beer or wine, as specified. Existing law limits the period of a special license to 15 days and provides that a special license shall be issued only 3 times in a calendar year. This bill would authorize up to 4 special licenses per nonprofit corporation per calendar year. (3) Existing law requires a special license that is issued for a period exceeding 2 days to be used solely for retail sales in conjunction with an identifiable fundraising event, as specified. This bill would expand that provision, instead requiring a special license that is issued for a period exceeding 2 days to be used solely in conjunction with an identifiable fundraising event, as specified. (4) Under existing law, an alcoholic beverage license is generally renewable unless the license has been revoked, except if it is a temporary license or a specified on-sale general license. Existing law prescribes procedures for the renewal of licenses that presume the use of mail for certain purposes. Existing law authorizes the reinstatement of a license that has been canceled pursuant to specified provisions during the 30 days immediately following cancellation upon payment by cashier's check or money order of the annual renewal fee plus a prescribed penalty fee. This bill would authorize the use of electronic mail for purposes of certain provisions of the above-described renewal process and would replace references to mailing with references to sending. With regard to payments made for the reinstatement of licenses, the bill would require that payment be made by cashier's check, money order, or electronically using payment methods authorized through the online payment portal of Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. (5) Existing law generally requires that a hearing held on a protest, accusation, or petition for an alcoholic beverage license be held in the county in which the premises or licensee is located. Existing law authorizes specified hearings before the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to be held at any place in the state where the department is meeting. This bill would authorize any hearing held on a protest, accusation, or petition for an alcoholic beverage license to be conducted in whole or in part by electronic means. The bill would require that any hearing conducted in person be held in the county in which the licensed premises or the licensee is located. For any part of a hearing conducted by electronic means, the bill would authorize the location of the hearing to be any place from which the department or any of the parties participates in the hearing. The bill would delete provisions that may compel holding a hearing in a city if a protest is filed against a license application and the proposed premises are in the city. This bill would authorize a party to a hearing that is noticed to be conducted electronically, as specified, to file a written motion to object to the electronic hearing and to request that the hearing, or portion of the hearing, to be conducted by electronic means be held in person and without the use of electronic communication. The bill would require that motion to include a proposed county for the location of the hearing and establish good cause regarding why an electronic hearing would be inappropriate. The bill would require this motion to be made to the presiding officer of the hearing and would specify the manner in which it is to be made.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 136, Statutes of 2022.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5640.) Ordered to the Senate.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  7. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 22).

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3476.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  13. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  14. Set for hearing April 18.

  15. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 3251.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. Set for hearing March 29.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  18. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  19. From printer.

  20. Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Governmental Organization · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Governmental Organization

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 31001
Unaffiliated 38001
Republican 9000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Wood — Yea
Smith — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ting — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Medina — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Salas — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Low — Yea
Levine — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Cunningham — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Luz Rivas — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Not Voting
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Yea
Valladares, Suzette Martinez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6001
Unaffiliated 5002
Republican 2000
Total 13003
% of votes cast 81%0%0%19%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Levine — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Vince Fong — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Democratic 8000
Republican 3000
Total 21001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Smith — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Daly — Yea
Salas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Davies, Laurie Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 13000
Unaffiliated 22001
Republican 4000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Borgeas — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Newman — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Roth — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Bates — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 10001
Republican 1000
Total 14001
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Nielsen — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Kamlager — Yea
Borgeas — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1011 do?
(1) Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages and the granting of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. Existing law establishes limitations on the number of on-sale general licenses that may be issued by the department based on the population of the county in which the licensed premises are located, as provided. Existing law provides an exception to the license limitation for a county of the 6th class, as specified, for 5 new original neighborhood-restricted special on-sale general licenses for premises located within specified census tracts in that county, subject to specified requirements. This bill would specify that the above-described census tracts correspond to those identified within the 2010 Census. (2) Existing law prohibits any licensee from giving any premium, gift, or free goods in connection with the sale or distribution of any alcoholic beverage, but permits alcoholic beverages to be provided in consumer contests and sweepstakes subject to specified conditions. Existing law permits the department to issue a special temporary on-sale or off-sale beer or wine license to certain nonprofit corporations that entitles the licensee to sell beer or wine, as specified. Existing law limits the period of a special license to 15 days and provides that a special license shall be issued only 3 times in a calendar year. This bill would authorize up to 4 special licenses per nonprofit corporation per calendar year. (3) Existing law requires a special license that is issued for a period exceeding 2 days to be used solely for retail sales in conjunction with an identifiable fundraising event, as specified. This bill would expand that provision, instead requiring a special license that is issued for a period exceeding 2 days to be used solely in conjunction with an identifiable fundraising event, as specified. (4) Under existing law, an alcoholic beverage license is generally renewable unless the license has been revoked, except if it is a temporary license or a specified on-sale general license. Existing law prescribes procedures for the renewal of licenses that presume the use of mail for certain purposes. Existing law authorizes the reinstatement of a license that has been canceled pursuant to specified provisions during the 30 days immediately following cancellation upon payment by cashier's check or money order of the annual renewal fee plus a prescribed penalty fee. This bill would authorize the use of electronic mail for purposes of certain provisions of the above-described renewal process and would replace references to mailing with references to sending. With regard to payments made for the reinstatement of licenses, the bill would require that payment be made by cashier's check, money order, or electronically using payment methods authorized through the online payment portal of Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. (5) Existing law generally requires that a hearing held on a protest, accusation, or petition for an alcoholic beverage license be held in the county in which the premises or licensee is located. Existing law authorizes specified hearings before the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to be held at any place in the state where the department is meeting. This bill would authorize any hearing held on a protest, accusation, or petition for an alcoholic beverage license to be conducted in whole or in part by electronic means. The bill would require that any hearing conducted in person be held in the county in which the licensed premises or the licensee is located. For any part of a hearing conducted by electronic means, the bill would authorize the location of the hearing to be any place from which the department or any of the parties participates in the hearing. The bill would delete provisions that may compel holding a hearing in a city if a protest is filed against a license application and the proposed premises are in the city. This bill would authorize a party to a hearing that is noticed to be conducted electronically, as specified, to file a written motion to object to the electronic hearing and to request that the hearing, or portion of the hearing, to be conducted by electronic means be held in person and without the use of electronic communication. The bill would require that motion to include a proposed county for the location of the hearing and establish good cause regarding why an electronic hearing would be inappropriate. The bill would require this motion to be made to the presiding officer of the hearing and would specify the manner in which it is to be made.
Who sponsors SB 1011?
SB 1011 is sponsored by Committee on Governmental Organization.
What is the current status of SB 1011?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1011?
Track SB 1011 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1011

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1011

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →