Theft: aggregation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2356 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2356.
You're tracking AB 2356
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2356 — Theft: aggregation.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 22, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, requires the theft of money, labor, or property to be considered petty theft, punishable as a misdemeanor, whenever the value of the property taken does not exceed $950. Existing California Supreme Court case law allows the value of property taken pursuant to distinct acts of theft to be aggregated to a single count of grand theft if motivated by one intention, one general impulse, and one plan. Existing appellate case law allows the value of property from more than one victim to be aggregated if the thefts were accomplished as a result of one scheme or plan to defraud the victims and a single intent to act. This bill would specify that if the value of the money, labor, real property, or personal property taken exceeds $950 over the course of distinct but related acts, whether committed against one or more victims, the value of the money, labor, real property, or personal property taken may properly be aggregated to charge a count of grand theft, if the acts are motivated by one intention, one general impulse, and one plan. The bill would state that these changes are declaratory of existing law.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/20/22 - Chaptered Current pdf June 20, 2022
- Enrolled 06/10/22 - Enrolled pdf June 10, 2022
- Amended 04/07/22 - Amended Assembly pdf April 07, 2022
- Introduced 02/16/22 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2022
- AB2356 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 22, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4129.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 31).
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 0. Page 4569.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 19).
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
- Rodriguez · Primary
- Sabrina Cervantes · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rodriguez
Co-sponsors (2)
- Fong, Mike Democratic
- Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 25 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 62 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Villapudua | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2356 do?
- Existing law, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, enacted as an initiative statute by Proposition 47, as approved by the electors at the November 4, 2014, statewide general election, requires the theft of money, labor, or property to be considered petty theft, punishable as a misdemeanor, whenever the value of the property taken does not exceed $950. Existing California Supreme Court case law allows the value of property taken pursuant to distinct acts of theft to be aggregated to a single count of grand theft if motivated by one intention, one general impulse, and one plan. Existing appellate case law allows the value of property from more than one victim to be aggregated if the thefts were accomplished as a result of one scheme or plan to defraud the victims and a single intent to act. This bill would specify that if the value of the money, labor, real property, or personal property taken exceeds $950 over the course of distinct but related acts, whether committed against one or more victims, the value of the money, labor, real property, or personal property taken may properly be aggregated to charge a count of grand theft, if the acts are motivated by one intention, one general impulse, and one plan. The bill would state that these changes are declaratory of existing law.
- Who sponsors AB 2356?
- AB 2356 is sponsored by Fong, Mike (Democratic), Rodriguez, and Cervantes, Sabrina (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2356?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2356?
- Track AB 2356 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2356
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2356
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →