Debt: coerced debts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 975 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 975.
You're tracking SB 975
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 975 — Debt: coerced debts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 989, Statutes of 2022.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law regulates various practices related to debt, including its sale and collection. Existing law provides for various private rights of action, including for a patient against a psychotherapist for sexual contact, as defined and specified, a peace officer against an individual who has filed a false complaint with the officer's employing agency, as specified, and a person against another for sexual harassment, as defined and specified. This bill would require a claimant, upon receipt from the debtor of adequate documentation AND a sworn written statement that some or all of the debt being collected is coerced debt, to cease collection activities until the claimant completes a review, as defined and specified. The bill would also prohibit a person from causing another person to incur a coerced debt, and would make a person who causes another person to incur a coerced debt civilly liable to the claimant, as specified. The bill would also create a right of action that would allow a debtor to bring an action or file a cross-complaint against a claimant to establish that a particular debt, or portion thereof, is coerced debt, as specified. If a debtor establishes that a particular debt, or portion thereof, is coerced debt, the bill (1) would entitle that debtor to specified relief, including an injunction prohibiting the claimant from holding or attempting to hold the debtor personally liable on the particular debt, or portion thereof, that is coerced debt, or from enforcing a judgment related to the particular debt, or portion thereof, that is coerced debt against the debtor, and (2) would require the court to issue a judgment in favor of the claimant against any person who coerced the debtor into incurring the debt, as specified. The bill would apply only to debts incurred on or after July 1, 2023, except as specified. The bill would declare that its provisions are severable. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. This bill would require a sworn written certification to be declared under penalty of perjury. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/22 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2022
- Enrolled 09/01/22 - Enrolled pdf September 01, 2022
- Amended 08/24/22 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2022
- Amended 08/15/22 - Amended Assembly pdf August 15, 2022
- Amended 06/30/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 30, 2022
- Amended 06/23/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2022
- Amended 06/16/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 16, 2022
- Amended 05/19/22 - Amended Senate pdf May 19, 2022
- Amended 05/02/22 - Amended Senate pdf May 02, 2022
- Amended 04/18/22 - Amended Senate pdf April 18, 2022
- Introduced 02/10/22 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2022
- SB975 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 989, Statutes of 2022.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 8. Page 5326.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (August 11).
-
August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 28).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
June 21 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 3884.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3777.) (May 19).
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
May 16 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 3513.) (April 26).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
April 19 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Min · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Min
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 29 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 59 | 15 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 19% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Villapudua | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Luz Rivas | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Alvarez, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca | Democratic | Yea |
| Bennett, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Boerner, Tasha | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Yea |
| McKinnor, Tina | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Petrie-Norris, Cottie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Ramos, James C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Rubio, Blanca E. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ward, Christopher M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Wilson, Lori D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Valladares, Suzette Martinez | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 20% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 19% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Haney, Matt | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 20% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 975 do?
- Existing law regulates various practices related to debt, including its sale and collection. Existing law provides for various private rights of action, including for a patient against a psychotherapist for sexual contact, as defined and specified, a peace officer against an individual who has filed a false complaint with the officer's employing agency, as specified, and a person against another for sexual harassment, as defined and specified. This bill would require a claimant, upon receipt from the debtor of adequate documentation AND a sworn written statement that some or all of the debt being collected is coerced debt, to cease collection activities until the claimant completes a review, as defined and specified. The bill would also prohibit a person from causing another person to incur a coerced debt, and would make a person who causes another person to incur a coerced debt civilly liable to the claimant, as specified. The bill would also create a right of action that would allow a debtor to bring an action or file a cross-complaint against a claimant to establish that a particular debt, or portion thereof, is coerced debt, as specified. If a debtor establishes that a particular debt, or portion thereof, is coerced debt, the bill (1) would entitle that debtor to specified relief, including an injunction prohibiting the claimant from holding or attempting to hold the debtor personally liable on the particular debt, or portion thereof, that is coerced debt, or from enforcing a judgment related to the particular debt, or portion thereof, that is coerced debt against the debtor, and (2) would require the court to issue a judgment in favor of the claimant against any person who coerced the debtor into incurring the debt, as specified. The bill would apply only to debts incurred on or after July 1, 2023, except as specified. The bill would declare that its provisions are severable. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. This bill would require a sworn written certification to be declared under penalty of perjury. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 975?
- SB 975 is sponsored by Min.
- What is the current status of SB 975?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 975?
- Track SB 975 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 975
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 975
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →