AB 2399 — Electrical services: provider of last resort.

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2399 do?

Existing law provides that an electrical corporation is the provider of last resort in its service territory except under specified circumstances, and defines the term "provider of last resort" as the load-serving entity required to provide electrical service to a retail customer whose service is transferred to that entity because the customer's load-serving entity failed to provide, or denied, service to the customer or otherwise failed to meet its obligations. Under existing law, one circumstance under which the electrical corporation is excused from duties as the provider of last resort is if the Public Utilities Commission designates a load serving entity, as defined, other than the electrical corporation to serve as the provider of last resort for all or a portion of that service territory pursuant to a joint application of the electrical corporation and that load-serving entity. Existing law establishes requirements for the application and for a load-serving entity other than the electrical corporation to serve as the provider of last resort. This bill would authorize an electrical corporation serving less than 30% of the total electrical load in its distribution service territory to request approval from the commission to voluntarily terminate its electrical service offering by submitting a joint application with a load-serving entity or entities proposing to serve the electrical corporation's existing customers to transfer those customers to that load-serving entity or entities. The bill would require the joint application to demonstrate that the load-serving entity or entities to which the customers would be transferred have the ability and a viable plan to comply with certain electricity procurement requirements. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of a commission action implementing those provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors AB 2399?

AB 2399 is sponsored by Mayes.

What is the current status of AB 2399?

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Where can I track AB 2399?

Track AB 2399 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.