Criminal sentencing: dismissal of enhancements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2027 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2027.
You're tracking AB 2027
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2027 — Criminal sentencing: dismissal of enhancements.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prescribes certain criminal sentencing enhancements that increase the term of imprisonment for specified criminal offenses committed under circumstances including those committed using a firearm, those committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang, those committed by a repeat offender, and those determined to be hate crimes. Existing law requires a sentencing court to dismiss an enhancement if, after considering specified mitigating circumstances, the court determines that it is in the furtherance of justice to do so. This bill would exempt from this requirement an enhancement imposed for an offense determined to be a hate crime.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/14/22 - Introduced Current pdf February 14, 2022
- AB2027 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Steven S. Choi · Primary
- Low · Cosponsor
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
- Kiley · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Stephanie Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Choi, Steven S. Republican
Co-sponsors (7)
- Low
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Davies, Laurie Republican
- Kiley
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Seyarto, Kelly | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2027 do?
- Existing law prescribes certain criminal sentencing enhancements that increase the term of imprisonment for specified criminal offenses committed under circumstances including those committed using a firearm, those committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang, those committed by a repeat offender, and those determined to be hate crimes. Existing law requires a sentencing court to dismiss an enhancement if, after considering specified mitigating circumstances, the court determines that it is in the furtherance of justice to do so. This bill would exempt from this requirement an enhancement imposed for an offense determined to be a hate crime.
- Who sponsors AB 2027?
- AB 2027 is sponsored by Choi, Steven S. (Republican), Low, Chen, Phillip (Republican), Davies, Laurie (Republican), Kiley, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Nguyen, Stephanie (Democratic), and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2027?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2027?
- Track AB 2027 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2027
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2027
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →