Cannabis and cannabis products: labeling and advertisement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1097 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1097.
You're tracking SB 1097
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1097 — Cannabis and cannabis products: labeling and advertisement.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Reyes.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities, including retail commercial cannabis activity, under the jurisdiction of the Department of Cannabis Control. Existing law requires cannabis and cannabis product labels and inserts to include specified warnings about the safety of cannabis use. This<caml:Numerator>1</caml:Numerator><caml:Denominator>3</caml:Denominator></caml:Fraction> of the front or principal face of a product, is in the largest type possible for the area, is bright yellow, and includes a pictorial or graphic element, as specified, and one of a series of warnings. The bill would require the licensee to use a mandated rotating warnings approach where batches of products are equally divided between the prescribed messages."?> bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2025, to adopt regulations to require cannabis and cannabis product labels and inserts to include a clear and prominent warning regarding the risks that cannabis use may contribute to mental health problems, in addition to existing labeling requirements. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the State Department of Public Health and the University of California, including the University of California San Francisco Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, to reevaluate the regulations every 5 years, commencing January 1, 2030, to determine whether the regulations reflect the state of the evolving science on cannabis health effects and on effective communication of health warnings. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2024, and in consultation with the State Department of Public Health, to create and post for public use a single-page flat or folded brochure that includes prescribed information, including, among other things, the recommendation that new users start with lower doses and the dangers of purchasing illegally sold cannabis and cannabis products. The bill would require, on and after March 1, 2024, a retailer or microbusiness selling, or person delivering, cannabis or cannabis products to a consumer offer each new consumer a copy of the brochure at the time of first purchase or delivery and to have the brochures visibly available at point of service. The bill would require the department, commencing January 1, 2030, and every 5 years thereafter, to either recertify the information in the brochure or provide updated language, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/22/22 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 22, 2022
- Amended 06/06/22 - Amended Assembly pdf June 06, 2022
- Amended 05/19/22 - Amended Senate pdf May 19, 2022
- Amended 03/29/22 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2022
- Introduced 02/16/22 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2022
- SB1097 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Reyes.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 11).
-
August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
-
(Corrected July 7).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 21).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 3. Page 3928.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3927.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Pan.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 3.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3783.) (May 19).
-
Set for hearing May 19.
-
April 18 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3307.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing April 4.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From printer.
-
Article IV Section 8(a) of the Constitution and Joint Rule 55 dispensed with February 7, 2022, suspending the 30 calendar day requirement.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pan · Primary
- Jacqui Irwin · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pan
Co-sponsors (2)
- Irwin, Jacqui Democratic
- McCarty
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Rivas, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Davies, Laurie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 0% | 0% | 42% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Vince Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Lee, Alex | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah | Democratic | Yea |
| Wicks, Buffy | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Borgeas | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 25 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 8% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Borgeas | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Not Voting |
| Kamlager | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cortese, Dave | Democratic | Yea |
| Durazo, Maria Elena | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Umberg, Thomas J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Kamlager | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Laird, John | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Min | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Archuleta, Bob | Democratic | Yea |
| Becker, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Hurtado, Melissa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1097 do?
- The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities, including retail commercial cannabis activity, under the jurisdiction of the Department of Cannabis Control. Existing law requires cannabis and cannabis product labels and inserts to include specified warnings about the safety of cannabis use. This<caml:Numerator>1</caml:Numerator><caml:Denominator>3</caml:Denominator></caml:Fraction> of the front or principal face of a product, is in the largest type possible for the area, is bright yellow, and includes a pictorial or graphic element, as specified, and one of a series of warnings. The bill would require the licensee to use a mandated rotating warnings approach where batches of products are equally divided between the prescribed messages."?> bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2025, to adopt regulations to require cannabis and cannabis product labels and inserts to include a clear and prominent warning regarding the risks that cannabis use may contribute to mental health problems, in addition to existing labeling requirements. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the State Department of Public Health and the University of California, including the University of California San Francisco Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, to reevaluate the regulations every 5 years, commencing January 1, 2030, to determine whether the regulations reflect the state of the evolving science on cannabis health effects and on effective communication of health warnings. This bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2024, and in consultation with the State Department of Public Health, to create and post for public use a single-page flat or folded brochure that includes prescribed information, including, among other things, the recommendation that new users start with lower doses and the dangers of purchasing illegally sold cannabis and cannabis products. The bill would require, on and after March 1, 2024, a retailer or microbusiness selling, or person delivering, cannabis or cannabis products to a consumer offer each new consumer a copy of the brochure at the time of first purchase or delivery and to have the brochures visibly available at point of service. The bill would require the department, commencing January 1, 2030, and every 5 years thereafter, to either recertify the information in the brochure or provide updated language, as specified.
- Who sponsors SB 1097?
- SB 1097 is sponsored by Pan, Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic), and McCarty.
- What is the current status of SB 1097?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1097?
- Track SB 1097 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1097
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1097
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →