HR 8997 — Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025
Last action — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8997 would be postponed.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
Bill Text
- Reported Reported in House Current html July 11, 2024
What Congress says this changes
H. Rept. 118-580Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.
Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.
changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italics, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): PUBLIC LAW 108-361 * * * * * * * TITLE I--CALIFORNIA WATER SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT * * * * * * * SEC. 103. BAY DELTA PROGRAM. (a) In General.-- (1) Record of decision as general framework.--The Record of Decision is approved as a general framework for addressing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program, including its components relating to water storage, ecosystem restoration, water supply reliability (including new firm yield), conveyance, water use efficiency, water quality, water transfers, watersheds, the Environmental Water Account, levee stability, governance, and science. (2) Requirements.-- (A) In general.--The Secretary and the heads of the Federal agencies are authorized to carry out the activities described in subsections (c) through (f) consistent with-- (i) the Record of Decision; (ii) the requirement that Program activities consisting of protecting drinking water quality, restoring ecological health, improving water supply reliability (including additional storage, conveyance, and new firm yield), and protecting Delta levees will progress in a balanced manner; and (iii) this title. (B) Multiple benefits.--In selecting activities and projects, the Secretary and the heads of the Federal agencies shall consider whether the activities and projects have multiple benefits. (b) Authorized Activities.--The Secretary and the heads of the Federal agencies are authorized to carry out the activities described in subsections (c) through (f) in furtherance of the Calfed Bay-Delta Program as set forth in the Record of Decision, subject to the cost-share and other provisions of this title, if the activity has been-- (1) subject to environmental review and approval, as required under applicable Federal and State law; and (2) approved and certified by the relevant Federal agency, following consultation and coordination with the Governor, to be consistent with the Record of Decision. (c) Authorizations for Federal Agencies Under Applicable Law.-- (1) Secretary of the interior.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under the reclamation laws, the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (title XXXIV of Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4706), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and other applicable law. (2) Administrator of the environmental protection agency.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (3), (5), (6), (7), (8), and (9) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), and other applicable law. (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (1), (2), (6), (7), (8), and (9) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under flood control, water resource development, and other applicable law. (4) Secretary of commerce.--The Secretary of Commerce is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (2), (6), (7), and (9) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and other applicable law. (5) Secretary of agriculture.--The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (3), (5), (6), (7), (8), and (9) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.), the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-171; 116 Stat. 134) (including amendments made by that Act), and other applicable law. (d) Description of Activities Under Applicable Law.-- (1) Water storage.-- (A) In general.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (i) planning and feasibility studies for projects to be pursued with project-specific study for enlargement of-- (I) the Shasta Dam in Shasta County; and (II) the Los Vaqueros Reservoir in Contra Costa County; (ii) planning and feasibility studies for the following projects requiring further consideration-- (I) the Sites Reservoir in Colusa County; and (II) the Upper San Joaquin River storage in Fresno and Madera Counties; (iii) developing and implementing groundwater management and groundwater storage projects; and (iv) comprehensive water management planning. (B) Storage project authorization and balanced calfed implementation.-- (i) In general.--If on completion of the feasibility study for a project described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in consultation with the Governor, determines that the project should be constructed in whole or in part with Federal funds, the Secretary shall submit the feasibility study to Congress. (ii) Finding of imbalance.--If Congress fails to authorize construction of the project by the end of the next full session following the submission of the feasibility study, the Secretary, in consultation with the Governor, shall prepare a written determination making a finding of imbalance for the Calfed Bay-Delta Program. (iii) Report on rebalancing.-- (I) In general.--If the Secretary makes a finding of imbalance for the Program under clause (ii), the Secretary, in consultation with the Governor, shall, not later than 180 days after the end of the full session described in clause (ii), prepare and submit to Congress a report on the measures necessary to rebalance the Program. (II) Schedules and alternatives.--The report shall include preparation of revised schedules and identification of alternatives to rebalance the Program, including resubmission of the project to Congress with or without modification, construction of other projects, and construction of other projects that provide equivalent water supply and other benefits at equal or lesser cost. (C) Water supply and yield study.-- (i) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation and in coordination with the State, shall conduct a study of available water supplies and existing and future needs for water-- (I) within the units of the Central Valley Project; (II) within the area served by Central Valley Project agricultural, municipal, and industrial water service contractors; and (III) within the Calfed Delta solution area. (ii) Relationship to prior study.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall incorporate and revise, as necessary, the results of the study required by section 3408(j) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4730). (iii) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriating committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the study, including-- (I) new firm yield and water supply improvements, if any, for Central Valley Project agricultural water service contractors and municipal and industrial water service contractors, including those identified in Bulletin 160; (II) all water management actions or projects, including those identified in Bulletin 160, that would-- (aa) improve firm yield or water supply; and (bb) if taken or constructed, balance available water supplies and existing demand with due recognition of water right priorities and environmental needs; (III) the financial costs of the actions and projects described under subclause (II); and (IV) the beneficiaries of those actions and projects and an assessment of the willingness of the beneficiaries to pay the capital costs and operation and maintenance costs of the actions and projects. (D) Management.--The Secretary shall conduct activities related to developing groundwater storage projects to the extent authorized under law. (E) Comprehensive water planning.--The Secretary shall conduct activities related to comprehensive water management planning to the extent authorized under law. (2) Conveyance.-- (A) South delta actions.-- (i) In general.--In the case of the South Delta, activities under this subparagraph consist of-- (I) the South Delta Improvements Program through actions to-- (aa) increase the State Water Project export limit to 8,500 cfs; (bb) install permanent, operable barriers in the South Delta, under which Federal agencies shall cooperate with the State to accelerate installation of the permanent, operable barriers in the South Delta, with an intent to complete that installation not later than September 30, 2007; (cc) evaluate, consistent with the Record of Decision, fish screens and intake facilities at the Tracy Pumping Plant facilities; and (dd) increase the State Water Project export to the maximum capability of 10,300 cfs; (II) reduction of agricultural drainage in South Delta channels, and other actions necessary to minimize the impact of drainage on drinking water quality; (III) evaluation of lower San Joaquin River floodway improvements; (IV) installation and operation of temporary barriers in the South Delta until fully operable barriers are constructed; and (V) actions to protect navigation and local diversions not adequately protected by temporary barriers. (ii) Actions to increase pumping.-- Actions to increase pumping shall be accomplished in a manner consistent with the Record of Decision requirement to avoid redirected impacts and adverse impacts to fishery protection and with any applicable Federal or State law that protects-- (I) water diversions and use (including avoidance of increased costs of diversion) by in-Delta water users (including in-Delta agricultural users that have historically relied on water diverted for use in the Delta); (II) water quality for municipal, industrial, agricultural, and other uses; and (III) water supplies for areas of origin. (B) North delta actions.--In the case of the North Delta, activities under this subparagraph consist of-- (i) evaluation and implementation of improved operational procedures for the Delta Cross Channel to address fishery and water quality concerns; (ii) evaluation of a screened through-Delta facility on the Sacramento River; and (iii) evaluation of lower Mokelumne River floodway improvements. (C) Interties.--Activities under this subparagraph consist of-- (i) evaluation and construction of an intertie between the State Water Project California Aqueduct and the Central Valley Project Delta Mendota Canal, near the City of Tracy, as an operation and maintenance activity, except that the Secretary shall design and construct the intertie in a manner consistent with a possible future expansion of the intertie capacity (as described in subsection (f)(1)(B)); and (ii) assessment of a connection of the Central Valley Project to the Clifton Court Forebay of the State Water Project, with a corresponding increase in the screened intake of the Forebay. (D) Program to meet standards.-- (i) In general.--Prior to increasing export limits from the Delta for the purposes of conveying water to south- of-Delta Central Valley Project contractors or increasing deliveries through an intertie, the Secretary shall, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, in consultation with the Governor, develop and initiate implementation of a program to meet all existing water quality standards and objectives for which the Central Valley Project has responsibility. (ii) Measures.--In developing and implementing the program, the Secretary shall include, to the maximum extent feasible, the measures described in clauses (iii) through (vii). (iii) Recirculation program.--The Secretary shall incorporate into the program a recirculation program to provide flow, reduce salinity concentrations in the San Joaquin River, and reduce the reliance on the New Melones Reservoir for meeting water quality and fishery flow objectives through the use of excess capacity in export pumping and conveyance facilities. (iv) Best management practices plan.-- (I) In general.--The Secretary shall develop and implement, in coordination with the State's programs to improve water quality in the San Joaquin River, a best management practices plan to reduce the water quality impacts of the discharges from wildlife refuges that receive water from the Federal Government and discharge salt or other constituents into the San Joaquin River. (II) Coordination with interested parties.--The plan shall be developed in coordination with interested parties in the San Joaquin Valley and the Delta. (III) Coordination with entities that discharge water.--The Secretary shall also coordinate activities under this clause with other entities that discharge water into the San Joaquin River to reduce salinity concentrations discharged into the River, including the timing of discharges to optimize their assimilation. (v) Acquisition of water.--The Secretary shall incorporate into the program the acquisition from willing sellers of water from streams tributary to the San Joaquin River or other sources to provide flow, dilute discharges of salt or other constituents, and to improve water quality in the San Joaquin River below the confluence of the Merced and San Joaquin Rivers, and to reduce the reliance on New Melones Reservoir for meeting water quality and fishery flow objectives. (vi) Purpose.--The purpose of the authority and direction provided to the Secretary under this subparagraph is to provide greater flexibility in meeting the existing water quality standards and objectives for which the Central Valley Project has responsibility so as to reduce the demand on water from New Melones Reservoir used for that purpose and to assist the Secretary in meeting any obligations to Central Valley Project contractors from the New Melones Project. (vii) Updating of new melones operating plan.--The Secretary shall update the New Melones operating plan to take into account, among other things, the actions described in this title that are designed to reduce the reliance on New Melones Reservoir for meeting water quality and fishery flow objectives, and to ensure that actions to enhance fisheries in the Stanislaus River are based on the best available science. (3) Water use efficiency.-- (A) Water conservation projects.--Activities under this paragraph include water conservation projects that provide water supply reliability, water quality, and ecosystem benefits to the California Bay-Delta system. (B) Technical assistance.--Activities under this paragraph include technical assistance for urban and agricultural water conservation projects. (C) Water recycling and desalination projects.--Activities under this paragraph include water recycling and desalination projects, including groundwater remediation projects and projects identified in the Bay Area Water Plan and the Southern California Comprehensive Water Reclamation and Reuse Study and other projects, giving priority to projects that include regional solutions to benefit regional water supply and reliability needs. (D) Water measurement and transfer actions.-- Activities under this paragraph include water measurement and transfer actions. (E) Urban water conservation.--Activities under this paragraph include implementation of best management practices for urban water conservation. (F) Reclamation and recycling projects.-- (i) Projects.--This subparagraph applies to-- (I) projects identified in the Southern California Comprehensive Water Reclamation and Reuse Study, dated April 2001 and authorized by section 1606 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-4); and (II) projects identified in the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program described in the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program Recycled Water Master Plan, dated December 1999 and authorized by section 1611 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h- 9). (ii) Deadline.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall-- (I) complete the review of the existing studies of the projects described in clause (i); and (II) make the feasibility determinations described in clause (iii). (iii) Feasibility determinations.--A project described in clause (i) is presumed to be feasible if the Secretary determines for the project-- (I) in consultation with the affected local sponsoring agency and the State, that the existing planning and environmental studies for the project (together with supporting materials and documentation) have been prepared consistent with Bureau of Reclamation procedures for projects under consideration for financial assistance under the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.); and (II) that the planning and environmental studies for the project (together with supporting materials and documentation) demonstrate that the project will contribute to the goals of improving water supply reliability in the Calfed solution area or the Colorado River Basin within the State and otherwise meets the requirements of section 1604 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h- 2). (iv) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of completion of a feasibility study or the review of a feasibility study under this subparagraph, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriating committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the study or review. (4) Water transfers.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (A) increasing the availability of existing facilities for water transfers; (B) lowering transaction costs through permit streamlining; and (C) maintaining a water transfer information clearinghouse. (5) Integrated regional water management plans.-- Activities under this paragraph consist of assisting local and regional communities in the State in developing and implementing integrated regional water management plans to carry out projects and programs that improve water supply reliability, water quality, ecosystem restoration, and flood protection, or meet other local and regional needs, in a manner that is consistent with, and makes a significant contribution to, the Calfed Bay-Delta Program. (6) Ecosystem restoration.-- (A) In general.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (i) implementation of large-scale restoration projects in San Francisco Bay and the Delta and its tributaries; (ii) restoration of habitat in the Delta, San Pablo Bay, and Suisun Bay and Marsh, including tidal wetland and riparian habitat; (iii) fish screen and fish passage improvement projects, including the Sacramento River Small Diversion Fish Screen Program; (iv) implementation of an invasive species program, including prevention, control, and eradication; (v) development and integration of Federal and State agricultural programs that benefit wildlife into the Ecosystem Restoration Program; (vi) financial and technical support for locally-based collaborative programs to restore habitat while addressing the concerns of local communities; (vii) water quality improvement projects to manage or reduce concentrations of salinity, selenium, mercury, pesticides, trace metals, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, sediment, and other pollutants; (viii) land and water acquisitions to improve habitat and fish spawning and survival in the Delta and its tributaries; (ix) integrated flood management, ecosystem restoration, and levee protection projects; (x) scientific evaluations and targeted research on Program activities; and (xi) strategic planning and tracking of Program performance. (B) Reporting requirements.--The Secretary or the head of the relevant Federal agency (as appropriate under clause (ii)) shall provide to the appropriate authorizing committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives and other appropriate parties in accordance with this subparagraph-- (i) an annual ecosystem program plan report in accordance with subparagraph (C); and (ii) detailed project reports in accordance with subparagraph (D). (C) Annual ecosystem program plan.-- (i) In general.--Not later than October 1 of each year, with respect to each ecosystem restoration action carried out using Federal funds under this title, the Secretary, in consultation with the Governor, shall submit to the appropriate authorizing committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives an annual ecosystem program plan report. (ii) Purposes.--The purposes of the report are-- (I) to describe the projects and programs to implement this subsection in the following fiscal year; and (II) to establish priorities for funding the projects and programs for subsequent fiscal years. (iii) Contents.--The report shall describe-- (I) the goals and objectives of the programs and projects; (II) program accomplishments; (III) major activities of the programs; (IV) the Federal agencies involved in each project or program identified in the plan and the cost-share arrangements with cooperating agencies; (V) the resource data and ecological monitoring data to be collected for the restoration projects and how the data are to be integrated, streamlined, and designed to measure the effectiveness and overall trend of ecosystem health in the Bay-Delta watershed; (VI) implementation schedules and budgets; (VII) existing monitoring programs and performance measures; (VIII) the status and effectiveness of measures to minimize the impacts of the program on agricultural land; and (IX) a description of expected benefits of the restoration program relative to the cost. (iv) Special rule for land acquisition using federal funds.--For each ecosystem restoration project involving land acquisition using Federal funds under this title, the Secretary shall-- (I) identify the specific parcels to be acquired in the annual ecosystem program plan report under this subparagraph; or (II) not later than 150 days before the project is approved, provide to the appropriate authorizing committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the United States Senators from the State, and the United States Representative whose district would be affected, notice of any such proposed land acquisition using Federal funds under this title submitted to the Federal or State agency. (D) Detailed project reports.-- (i) In general.--In the case of each ecosystem restoration program or project funded under this title that is not specifically identified in an annual ecosystem program plan under subparagraph (C), not later than 45 days prior to approval, the Secretary, in coordination with the State, shall submit to the appropriate authorizing committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives recommendations on the proposed program or project. (ii) Contents.--The recommendations shall-- (I) describe the selection of the program or project, including the level of public involvement and independent science review; (II) describe the goals, objectives, and implementation schedule of the program or project, and the extent to which the program or project addresses regional and programmatic goals and priorities; (III) describe the monitoring plans and performance measures that will be used for evaluating the performance of the proposed program or project; (IV) identify any cost- sharing arrangements with cooperating entities; (V) identify how the proposed program or project will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and (VI) in the case of any program or project involving the acquisition of private land using Federal funds under this title-- (aa) describe the process and timing of notification of interested members of the public and local governments; (bb) describe the measures taken to minimize impacts on agricultural land pursuant to the Record of Decision; and (cc) include preliminary management plans for all properties to be acquired with Federal funds, including an overview of existing conditions (including habitat types in the affected project area), the expected ecological benefits, preliminary cost estimates, and implementation schedules. (7) Watersheds.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (A) building local capacity to assess and manage watersheds affecting the Delta system; (B) technical assistance for watershed assessments and management plans; and (C) developing and implementing locally-based watershed conservation, maintenance, and restoration actions. (8) Water quality.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (A) addressing drainage problems in the San Joaquin Valley to improve downstream water quality (including habitat restoration projects that improve water quality) if-- (i) a plan is in place for monitoring downstream water quality improvements; and (ii) State and local agencies are consulted on the activities to be funded; except that no right, benefit, or privilege is created as a result of this subparagraph; (B) implementation of source control programs in the Delta and its tributaries; (C) developing recommendations through scientific panels and advisory council processes to meet the Calfed Bay-Delta Program goal of continuous improvement in Delta water quality for all uses; (D) investing in treatment technology demonstration projects; (E) controlling runoff into the California aqueduct, the Delta-Mendota Canal, and other similar conveyances; (F) addressing water quality problems at the North Bay Aqueduct; (G) supporting and participating in the development of projects to enable San Francisco Bay Area water districts, and water entities in San Joaquin and Sacramento Counties, to work cooperatively to address their water quality and supply reliability issues, including-- (i) connections between aqueducts, water transfers, water conservation measures, institutional arrangements, and infrastructure improvements that encourage regional approaches; and (ii) investigations and studies of available capacity in a project to deliver water to the East Bay Municipal Utility District under its contract with the Bureau of Reclamation, dated July 20, 2001, in order to determine if such capacity can be utilized to meet the objectives of this subparagraph; (H) development of water quality exchanges and other programs to make high quality water available for urban and other users; (I) development and implementation of a plan to meet all Delta water quality standards for which the Federal and State water projects have responsibility; (J) development of recommendations through science panels and advisory council processes to meet the Calfed Bay-Delta Program goal of continuous improvement in water quality for all uses; and (K) projects that are consistent with the framework of the water quality component of the Calfed Bay-Delta Program. (9) Science.--Activities under this paragraph consist of-- (A) supporting establishment and maintenance of an independent science board, technical panels, and standing boards to provide oversight and peer review of the Program; (B) conducting expert evaluations and scientific assessments of all Program elements; (C) coordinating existing monitoring and scientific research programs; (D) developing and implementing adaptive management experiments to test, refine, and improve scientific understandings; (E) establishing performance measures, and monitoring and evaluating the performance of all Program elements; and (F) preparing an annual science report. (10) Diversification of water supplies.--Activities under this paragraph consist of actions to diversify sources of level 2 refuge supplies and modes of delivery to refuges while maintaining the diversity of level 4 supplies pursuant to section 3406(d)(2) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (Public Law 102- 575; 106 Stat. 4723). (e) New and Expanded Authorizations for Federal Agencies.-- (1) In general.--The heads of the Federal agencies described in this subsection are authorized to carry out the activities described in subsection (f) during each of fiscal years 2005 through 2022, in coordination with the Governor. (2) Secretary of the interior.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (f). (3) Administrator of the environmental protection agency and the secretaries of agriculture and commerce.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Commerce are authorized to carry out the activities described in subsection (f)(4). (4) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (f). (f) Description of Activities Under New and Expanded Authorizations.-- (1) Conveyance.--Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 109, not more than $184,000,000 may be expended for the following: (A) San luis reservoir.--Funds may be expended for feasibility studies, evaluation, and implementation of the San Luis Reservoir lowpoint improvement project, except that Federal participation in any construction of an expanded Pacheco Reservoir shall be subject to future congressional authorization. (B) Intertie.--Funds may be expended for feasibility studies and evaluation of increased capacity of the intertie between the State Water Project California Aqueduct and the Central Valley Project Delta Mendota Canal. (C) Franks tract.--Funds may be expended for feasibility studies and actions at Franks Tract to improve water quality in the Delta. (D) Clifton court forebay and the tracy pumping plant.--Funds may be expended for feasibility studies and design of fish screen and intake facilities at Clifton Court Forebay and the Tracy Pumping Plant facilities. (E) Drinking water intake facilities.-- (i) In general.--Funds may be expended for design and construction of the relocation of drinking water intake facilities to in-Delta water users. (ii) Drinking water quality.--The Secretary shall coordinate actions for relocating intake facilities on a time schedule consistent with subsection (d)(2)(A)(i)(I)(bb) or take other actions necessary to offset the degradation of drinking water quality in the Delta due to the South Delta Improvement Program. (F) New melones reservoir.-- (i) In general.--In addition to the other authorizations granted to the Secretary by this title, the Secretary shall acquire water from willing sellers and undertake other actions designed to decrease releases from the New Melones Reservoir for meeting water quality standards and flow objectives for which the Central Valley Project has responsibility to assist in meeting allocations to Central Valley Project contractors from the New Melones Project. (ii) Purpose.--The authorization under this subparagraph is solely meant to add flexibility for the Secretary to meet any obligations of the Secretary to the Central Valley Project contractors from the New Melones Project by reducing demand for water dedicated to meeting water quality standards in the San Joaquin River. (iii) Funding.--Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 109, not more than $30,000,000 may be expended to carry out clause (i). (G) Recirculation of export water.--Funds may be used to conduct feasibility studies, evaluate, and, if feasible, implement the recirculation of export water to reduce salinity and improve dissolved oxygen in the San Joaquin River. (2) Environmental water account.-- (A) In general.--Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 109, not more than $90,000,000 may be expended for implementation of the Environmental Water Account. (B) Nonreimbursable federal expenditure.-- Expenditures under subparagraph (A) shall be considered a nonreimbursable Federal expenditure in recognition of the payments of the contractors of the Central Valley Project to the Restoration Fund created by the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (Title XXXIV of Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4706). (C) Use of restoration fund.-- (i) In general.--Of the amounts appropriated for the Restoration Fund for each fiscal year, an amount not to exceed $10,000,000 for any fiscal year may be used to implement the Environmental Water Account to the extent those actions are consistent with the fish and wildlife habitat restoration and improvement purposes of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act. (ii) Accounting.--Any such use of the Restoration Fund shall count toward the 33 percent of funds made available to the Restoration Fund that, pursuant to section 3407(a) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, are otherwise authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out paragraphs (4) through (6), (10) through (18), and (20) through (22) of section 3406(b) of that Act. (iii) Federal funding.--The $10,000,000 limitation on the use of the Restoration Fund for the Environmental Water Account under clause (i) does not limit the appropriate amount of Federal funding for the Environmental Water Account. (3) Levee stability.-- (A) In general.--For purposes of implementing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program), the Secretary of the Army is authorized to undertake the construction and implementation of levee stability programs or projects for such purposes as flood control, ecosystem restoration, water supply, water conveyance, and water quality objectives. (B) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriating committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that describes the levee stability reconstruction projects and priorities that will be carried out under this title during each of fiscal years 2005 through 2022. (C) Justification.-- (i) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), in carrying out levee stability programs and projects pursuant to this paragraph, the Secretary of the Army may determine that the programs and projects are justified by the benefits of the project purposes described in subparagraph (A), and the programs and projects shall require no additional economic justification if the Secretary of the Army further determines that the programs and projects are cost effective. (ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall not apply to any separable element intended to produce benefits that are predominantly unrelated to the project purposes described in subparagraph (A). (D) Projects.--Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 109, not more than $90,000,000 may be expended to-- (i) reconstruct Delta levees to a base level of protection (also known as the ``Public Law 84-99 standard'') as described in the Record of Decision; (ii) enhance the stability of levees that have particular importance in the system through the Delta Levee Special Improvement Projects Program; (iii) develop best management practices to control and reverse land subsidence on Delta islands; (iv) develop a Delta Levee Emergency Management and Response Plan that will enhance the ability of Federal, State, and local agencies to rapidly respond to levee emergencies; (v) develop a Delta Risk Management Strategy after assessing the consequences of Delta levee failure from floods, seepage, subsidence, and earthquakes; (vi) reconstruct Delta levees using, to the maximum extent practicable, dredged materials from the Sacramento River, the San Joaquin River, and the San Francisco Bay in reconstructing Delta levees; (vii) coordinate Delta levee projects with flood management, ecosystem restoration, and levee protection projects of the lower San Joaquin River and lower Mokelumne River floodway improvements and other projects under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Comprehensive Study; and (viii) evaluate and, if appropriate, rehabilitate the Suisun Marsh levees. (4) Program management, oversight, and coordination.-- (A) In general.--Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 109, not more than [$30,000,000] $40,000,000 may be expended by the Secretary or the other heads of Federal agencies, either directly or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements with agencies of the State, for-- (i) Program support; (ii) Program-wide tracking of schedules, finances, and performance; (iii) multiagency oversight and coordination of Program activities to ensure Program balance and integration; (iv) development of interagency cross-cut budgets and a comprehensive finance plan to allocate costs in accordance with the beneficiary pays provisions of the Record of Decision; (v) coordination of public outreach and involvement, including tribal, environmental justice, and public advisory activities in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.); and (vi) development of Annual Reports. (B) Program-wide activities.--Of the amount referred to in subparagraph (A), not less than 50 percent of the appropriated amount shall be provided to the California Bay-Delta Authority to carry out Program-wide management, oversight, and coordination activities. * * * * * * * ---------- RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT OF 1991 * * * * * * * TITLE III--GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS * * * * * * * SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. Except as otherwise provided in section 303 of this Act (relating to temperature control devices at Shasta Dam, California), there is authorized to be appropriated not more than [$120,000,000] $130,000,000 in total for the period of fiscal years 2006 through 2022. * * * * * * * ---------- INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT * * * * * * * DIVISION D--ENERGY * * * * * * * TITLE IX--WESTERN WATER INFRASTRUCTURE * * * * * * * SEC. 40902. WATER STORAGE, GROUNDWATER STORAGE, AND CONVEYANCE PROJECTS. (a) Eligibility for Funding.-- (1) Feasibility studies.-- (A) In general.--A feasibility study shall only be eligible for funding under section 40901(1) if-- (i) the feasibility study has been authorized by an Act of Congress before the date of enactment of this Act; (ii) Congress has approved funding for the feasibility study in accordance with section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (43 U.S.C. 390b note; Public Law 114-322) before the date of enactment of this Act; or (iii) the feasibility study is authorized under subparagraph (B). (B) Feasibility study authorizations.--The Secretary may carry out feasibility studies for the following projects: (i) The Verde Reservoirs Sediment Mitigation Project in the State of Arizona. (ii) The Tualatin River Basin Project in the State of Oregon. (2) Construction.--A project shall only be eligible for construction funding under section 40901(1) if-- (A) an Act of Congress enacted before the date of enactment of this Act authorizes construction of the project; (B) Congress has approved funding for construction of the project in accordance with section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (43 U.S.C. 390b note; Public Law 114-322) before the date of enactment of [this Act, except for any project for which--] this Act; or [(i) Congress did not approve the recommendation of the Secretary for funding under subsection (h)(2) of that section for at least 1 fiscal year before the date of enactment of this Act; or [(ii) State funding for the project was rescinded by the State before the date of enactment of this Act; or] (C)(i) Congress has authorized or approved funding for a feasibility study for the project in accordance with clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) [(except that projects described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (B) shall not be eligible)]; and (ii) on completion of the feasibility study for the project, the Secretary-- (I) finds the project to be technically and financially feasible in accordance with the reclamation laws; (II) determines that sufficient non-Federal funding is available for the non- Federal cost share of the project; and (III)(aa) finds the project to be in the public interest; and (bb) recommends the project for construction. (b) Cost-sharing Requirement.-- (1) In general.--The Federal share-- (A) for a project authorized by an Act of Congress shall be determined in accordance with that Act; (B) for a project approved by Congress in accordance with section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (43 U.S.C. 390b note; Public Law 114-322) (including construction resulting from a feasibility study authorized under that Act) shall be as provided in that Act; and (C) for a project not described in subparagraph (A) or (B)-- (i) in the case of a federally owned project, shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost of the project; and (ii) in the case of a non-Federal project, shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project. (2) Federal benefits.--Before funding a project under this section, the Secretary shall determine that, in return for the Federal investment in the project, at least a proportionate share of the benefits are Federal benefits. (3) Reimbursability.--The reimbursability of Federal funding of projects under this section shall be in accordance with the reclamation laws. (c) Environmental Laws.--In providing funding for a project under this section, the Secretary shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). * * * * * * * ---------- WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION ACT * * * * * * * TITLE III--NATURAL RESOURCES * * * * * * * Subtitle J--California Water * * * * * * * SEC. 4004. CONSULTATION ON COORDINATED OPERATIONS. (a) Resolution of Water Resource Issues.--In furtherance of the policy established by section 2(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, that Federal agencies shall cooperate with State and local agencies to resolve water resource issues in concert with conservation of endangered species, in any consultation or reconsultation on the coordinated operations of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project, the Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce shall ensure that any [public water agency that contracts] contractor for the delivery of water from the Central Valley Project or the State Water Project that so requests shall-- (1) have routine and continuing opportunities to discuss and submit information to the action agency for consideration during the development of any biological assessment or proposed action; (2) be informed by the action agency of the schedule for preparation of a biological assessment or proposed action; (3) receive a copy of the draft proposed action and have the opportunity to review that document and provide comment to the action agency, which comments shall be afforded due consideration during development; [(3)] (4) be informed by the consulting agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, of the schedule for preparation of the biological opinion at such time as the biological assessment is submitted to the consulting agency by the action agency; [(4)] (5) receive a copy of any draft biological opinion and have the opportunity to review that document and provide comment to the consulting agency through the action agency, which comments will be afforded due consideration during the consultation; [(5)] (6) have the opportunity to confer with the action agency and applicant, if any, about reasonable and prudent alternatives prior to the action agency or applicant identifying one or more reasonable and prudent alternatives for consideration by the consulting agency; and [(6)] (7) where action agency proposes a proposed action or the consulting agency suggests a reasonable and prudent alternative be informed-- (A) how each component of the proposed action or alternative will contribute to avoiding jeopardy or adverse modification of critical habitat and the scientific data or information that supports each component of the alternative; and (B) why other proposed [alternative actions] actions or alternatives that would have fewer adverse water supply and economic impacts are inadequate to avoid jeopardy or adverse modification of critical habitat. (b) Input.--When consultation is ongoing, the Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce shall regularly solicit input from and report their progress to the Collaborative Adaptive Management Team and the Collaborative Science and Adaptive Management Program policy group. The Collaborative Adaptive Management Team and the Collaborative Science and Adaptive Management Program policy group may provide the Secretaries with recommendations to improve the effects analysis and Federal agency determinations. The Secretaries shall give due consideration to the recommendations when developing the Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion. (c) Meetings.--The Secretaries shall establish a quarterly stakeholder meeting during any consultation or reconsultation for the purpose of providing updates on the development of the Biological Assessment and Biological Opinion. The quarterly stakeholder meeting shall be open to stakeholders identified by the Secretaries representing a broad range of interests including environmental, recreational and commercial fishing, agricultural, municipal, Delta, and other regional interests, and including stakeholders that are not state or local agencies. (d) Clarification.--Neither subsection (b) or (c) of this section may be used to meet the requirements of subsection (a). (e) Non-applicability of FACA.--For the purposes of subsection (b), the Collaborative Adaptive Management Team, the Collaborative Science and Adaptive Management Program policy group, and any recommendations made to the Secretaries, are exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act. * * * * * * * SEC. 4007. STORAGE. (a) Definitions.--In this subtitle: (1) Federally owned storage project.--The term ``federally owned storage project'' means any project involving a surface water storage facility in a Reclamation State-- (A) to which the United States holds title; and (B) that was authorized to be constructed, operated, and maintained pursuant to the reclamation laws. (2) State-led storage project.--The term ``State-led storage project'' means any project in a Reclamation State that-- (A) involves a groundwater or surface water storage facility constructed, operated, and maintained by any State, department of a State, subdivision of a State, or public agency organized pursuant to State law; and (B) provides a benefit in meeting any obligation under Federal law (including regulations). (b) Federally Owned Storage Projects.-- (1) Agreements.--On the request of any State, any department, agency, or subdivision of a State, or any public agency organized pursuant to State law, the Secretary of the Interior may negotiate and enter into an agreement on behalf of the United States for the design, study, and construction or expansion of any federally owned storage project in accordance with this section. (2) Federal cost share.--Subject to the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may participate in a federally owned storage project in an amount equal to not more than 50 percent of the total cost of the federally owned storage project. (3) Commencement.--The construction of a federally owned storage project that is the subject of an agreement under this subsection shall not commence until the Secretary of the Interior-- (A) determines that the proposed federally owned storage project is feasible in accordance with the reclamation laws; (B) secures an agreement providing upfront funding as is necessary to pay the non-Federal share of the capital costs; and (C) determines that, in return for the Federal cost-share investment in the federally owned storage project, at least a proportionate share of the project benefits are Federal benefits, including water supplies dedicated to specific purposes such as environmental enhancement and wildlife refuges. (4) Environmental laws.--In participating in a federally owned storage project under this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). (c) State-Led Storage Projects.-- (1) In general.--Subject to the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may participate in a State-led storage project in an amount equal to not more than 25 percent of the total cost of the State-led storage project. (2) Request by governor.--Participation by the Secretary of the Interior in a State-led storage project under this subsection shall not occur unless-- (A) the participation has been requested by the Governor of the State in which the State- led storage project is located; (B) the State or local sponsor determines, and the Secretary of the Interior concurs, that-- (i) the State-led storage project is technically and financially feasible and provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws; (ii) sufficient non-Federal funding is available to complete the State-led storage project; and (iii) the State-led storage project sponsors are financially solvent; (C) the Secretary of the Interior determines that, in return for the Federal cost-share investment in the State-led storage project, at least a proportional share of the project benefits are the Federal benefits, including water supplies dedicated to specific purposes such as environmental enhancement and wildlife refuges; and (D) the Secretary of the Interior submits to Congress a written notification of these determinations within 30 days of making such determinations. (3) Environmental laws.--When participating in a State-led storage project under this subsection, the Secretary shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). (4) Information.--When participating in a State-led storage project under this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior-- (A) may rely on reports prepared by the sponsor of the State-led storage project, including feasibility (or equivalent) studies, environmental analyses, and other pertinent reports and analyses; but (B) shall retain responsibility for making the independent determinations described in paragraph (2). (d) Authority To Provide Assistance.--The Secretary of the Interior may provide financial assistance under this subtitle to carry out projects within any Reclamation State. (e) Rights To Use Capacity.--Subject to compliance with State water rights laws, the right to use the capacity of a federally owned storage project or State-led storage project for which the Secretary of the Interior has entered into an agreement under this subsection shall be allocated in such manner as may be mutually agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and each other party to the agreement. (f) Compliance With California Water Bond.-- (1) In general.--The provision of Federal funding for construction of a State-led storage project in the State of California shall be subject to the condition that the California Water Commission shall determine that the State-led storage project is consistent with the California Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act, approved by California voters on November 4, 2014. (2) Applicability.--This subsection expires on the date on which State bond funds available under the Act referred to in paragraph (1) are expended. (g) Partnership and Agreements.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner, may partner or enter into an agreement regarding the water storage projects identified in section 103(d)(1) of the Water Supply, Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108- 361; 118 Stat. 1688) with local joint powers authorities formed pursuant to State law by irrigation districts and other local water districts and local governments within the applicable hydrologic region, to advance those projects. (h) Authorization of Appropriations.-- (1) $335,000,000 of funding in section 4011(e) is authorized to remain available until expended. (2) Projects can only receive funding if enacted appropriations legislation designates funding to them by name, after the Secretary recommends specific projects for funding pursuant to this section and transmits such recommendations to the appropriate committees of Congress. (i) Sunset.--This section shall apply only to federally owned storage projects and State-led storage projects that the Secretary of the Interior determines to be feasible before January 1, [2021] 2026. (j) Consistency With State Law.--Nothing in this section preempts or modifies any obligation of the United States to act in conformance with applicable State law. (k) Calfed Authorization.--Title I of Public Law 108-361 (the Calfed Bay-Delta Authorization Act) (118 Stat. 1681; 123 Stat. 2860; 128 Stat. 164; 128 Stat. 2312) (as amended by section 207 of Public Law 114-113) is amended by striking ``2017'' each place it appears and inserting ``2019''. * * * * * * * SEC. 4013. DURATION. This subtitle shall expire on the date that is 5 years after the date of its enactment, with the exception of-- (1) section 4004, which shall expire [10 years after the date of its enactment] on December 16, 2034; and (2) projects under construction in sections 4007, 4009(a), and 4009(c) on or before December 16, 2026. * * * * * * * ---------- NATURAL GAS ACT * * * * * * * exportation or importation of natural gas; lng terminals Sec. 3. [(a) After six months from the date on which this act takes effect no person shall export any natural gas from the United States to a foreign country or import any natural gas from a foreign country without first having secured an order of the Commission authorizing it to do so. The Commission shall issue such order upon application, unless, after opportunity for hearing, it finds that the proposed exportation or importation will not be consistent with the public interest. The Commission may by its order grant such application, in whole or in part, with such modification and upon such terms and conditions as the Commission may find necessary or appropriate, and may from time to time, after opportunity for hearing, and for good cause shown, make such supplemental order in the premises as it may find necessary or appropriate. [(b) With respect to natural gas which is imported into the United States from a nation with which there is in effect a free trade agreement requiring national treatment for trade in natural gas, and with respect to liquefied natural gas-- [(1) the importation of such natural gas shall be treated as a ``first sale'' within the meaning of section 2(21) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978; and [(2) the Commission shall not, on the basis of national origin, treat any such imported natural gas on an unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or preferential basis. [(c) For purposes of subsection (a), the importation of the natural gas referred to in subsection (b), or the exportation of natural gas to a nation with which there is in effect a free trade agreement requiring national treatment for trade in natural gas, shall be deemed to be consistent with the public interest, and applications for such importation or exportation shall be granted without modification or delay.] [(e)] (a)[(1) The Commission shall have the exclusive authority to approve or deny an application for the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of an LNG terminal. Except as specifically provided in this Act, nothing in this Act is intended to affect otherwise applicable law related to any Federal agency's authorities or responsibilities related to LNG terminals.](1) The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (in this subsection referred to as the ``Commission'' ) shall have the exclusive authority to approve or deny an application for authorization for the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of a facility to export natural gas from the United States to a foreign country or import natural gas from a foreign country, including an LNG terminal. In determining whether to approve or deny an application under this paragraph, the Commission shall deem the exportation or importation of natural gas to be consistent with the public interest. Except as specifically provided in this Act, nothing in this Act is intended to affect otherwise applicable law related to any Federal agency's authorities or responsibilities related to facilities to import or export natural gas, including LNG terminals. (2) Upon the filing of any application to site, construct, expand, or operate an LNG terminal, the Commission shall-- (A) set the matter for hearing; (B) give reasonable notice of the hearing to all interested persons, including the State commission of the State in which the LNG terminal is located and, if not the same, the Governor-appointed State agency described in section 3A; (C) decide the matter in accordance with this subsection; and (D) issue or deny the appropriate order accordingly. (3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Commission may approve an application described in paragraph (2), in whole or part, with such modifications and upon such terms and conditions as the Commission find necessary or appropriate. (B) Before January 1, 2015, the Commission shall not-- (i) deny an application solely on the basis that the applicant proposes to use the LNG terminal exclusively or partially for gas that the applicant or an affiliate of the applicant will supply to the facility; or (ii) condition an order on-- (I) a requirement that the LNG terminal offer service to customers other than the applicant, or any affiliate of the applicant, securing the order; (II) any regulation of the rates, charges, terms, or conditions of service of the LNG terminal; or (III) a requirement to file with the Commission schedules or contracts related to the rates, charges, terms, or conditions of service of the LNG terminal. (C) Subparagraph (B) shall cease to have effect on January 1, 2030. (4) An order issued for an LNG terminal that also offers service to customers on an open access basis shall not result in subsidization of expansion capacity by existing customers, degradation of service to existing customers, or undue discrimination against existing customers as to their terms or conditions of service at the facility, as all of those terms are defined by the Commission. [(f)] (b)(1) In this subsection, the term ``military installation''-- (A) means a base, camp, post, range, station, yard, center, or homeport facility for any ship or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including any leased facility, that is located within a State, the District of Columbia, or any territory of the United States; and (B) does not include any facility used primarily for civil works, rivers and harbors projects, or flood control projects, as determined by the Secretary of Defense. (2) The Commission shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of Defense for the purpose of ensuring that the Commission coordinate and consult with the Secretary of Defense on the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of liquefied natural gas facilities that may affect an active military installation. (3) The Commission shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense before authorizing the siting, construction, expansion, or operation of liquefied natural gas facilities affecting the training or activities of an active military installation. [(d)] (c) Except as specifically provided in this Act, nothing in this Act affects the rights of States under-- (1) the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.); (2) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); or (3) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). (d)(1) Nothing in this Act limits the authority of the President under the Constitution, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), part B of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6271 et seq.), the Trading With the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.), or any other provision of law that imposes sanctions on a foreign person or foreign government (including any provision of law that prohibits or restricts United States persons from engaging in a transaction with a sanctioned person or government), including a country that is designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, to prohibit imports or exports. (2) In this subsection, the term `state sponsor of terrorism' means a country the government of which the Secretary of State determines has repeatedly provided support for international terrorism pursuant to-- (A) section 1754(c)(1)(A) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4318(c)(1)(A)); (B) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371); (C) section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780); or (D) any other provision of law. * * * * * * * ---------- PUBLIC LAW 117-169 * * * * * * * TITLE V--COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Subtitle A--Energy * * * * * * * PART 4--DOE LOAN AND GRANT PROGRAMS SEC. 50141. FUNDING FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LOAN PROGRAMS OFFICE. (a) Commitment Authority.--In addition to commitment authority otherwise available and previously provided, the Secretary may make commitments to guarantee loans for eligible projects under section 1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513), up to a total principal amount of [$40,000,000,000] $25,000,000,000, to remain available through September 30, 2026. (b) Appropriation.--In addition to amounts otherwise available and previously provided, there is appropriated to the Secretary for fiscal year 2022, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $3,600,000,000, to remain available through September 30, 2026, for the costs of guarantees made under section 1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513), using the loan guarantee authority provided under subsection (a) of this section. (c) Administrative Expenses.--Of the amount made available under subsection (b), the Secretary shall reserve not more than 3 percent for administrative expenses to carry out title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and for carrying out section 1702(h)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 16512(h)(3)). (d) Limitations.-- (1) Certification.--None of the amounts made available under this section for loan guarantees shall be available for any project unless the President has certified in advance in writing that the loan guarantee and the project comply with the provisions under this section. (2) Denial of double benefit.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), none of the amounts made available under this section for loan guarantees shall be available for commitments to guarantee loans for any projects under which funds, personnel, or property (tangible or intangible) of any Federal agency, instrumentality, personnel, or affiliated entity are expected to be used (directly or indirectly) through acquisitions, contracts, demonstrations, exchanges, grants, incentives, leases, procurements, sales, other transaction authority, or other arrangements to support the project or to obtain goods or services from the project. (3) Exception.--Paragraph (2) shall not preclude the use of the loan guarantee authority provided under this section for commitments to guarantee loans for-- (A) projects benefitting from otherwise allowable Federal tax benefits; (B) projects benefitting from being located on Federal land pursuant to a lease or right- of-way agreement for which all consideration for all uses is-- (i) paid exclusively in cash; (ii) deposited in the Treasury as offsetting receipts; and (iii) equal to the fair market value; (C) projects benefitting from the Federal insurance program under section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2210); or (D) electric generation projects using transmission facilities owned or operated by a Federal Power Marketing Administration or the Tennessee Valley Authority that have been authorized, approved, and financed independent of the project receiving the guarantee. (e) Guarantee.--Section 1701(4)(A) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16511(4)(A)) is amended by inserting ``, except that a loan guarantee may guarantee any debt obligation of a non-Federal borrower to any Eligible Lender (as defined in section 136 STAT. 2044 609.2 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations)'' before the period at the end. (f) Source of Payments.--Section 1702(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16512(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(3) Source of payments.--The source of a payment received from a borrower under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (2) may not be a loan or other debt obligation that is made or guaranteed by the Federal Government.''. * * * * * * * SEC. 50144. ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE REINVESTMENT FINANCING. (a) Appropriation.--In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Secretary for fiscal year 2022, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $5,000,000,000, to remain available through September 30, 2026, to carry out activities under section 1706 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. (b) Commitment Authority.--The Secretary may make, through September 30, 2026, commitments to guarantee loans for projects under section 1706 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 the total principal amount of which is not greater than [$250,000,000,000] $5,000,000,000, subject to the limitations that apply to loan guarantees under section 50141(d). (c) Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment Financing.--(Omitted-- Amends other Act) (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1702(o)(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16512(o)(3)) is amended by inserting ``and projects described in section 1706(a)'' before the period at the end. * * * * * * * ---------- SECTION 1602 OF THE RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER STUDY AND FACILITIES ACT SEC. 1602. GENERAL AUTHORITY. (a) The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter ``Secretary''), acting pursuant to the Reclamation Act of 1902 (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388) and Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto (hereafter ``Federal reclamation laws''), is directed to undertake a program to investigate and identify opportunities for reclamation and reuse of municipal, industrial, domestic, and agricultural wastewater, and naturally impaired ground and surface waters, for the design and construction of demonstration and permanent facilities to reclaim and reuse wastewater, and to conduct research, including desalting, for the reclamation of wastewater and naturally impaired ground and surface waters. (b) Such program shall be limited to the States and areas referred to in section 1 of the Reclamation Act of 1902 (Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388) as amended, and the State of Hawaii. (c) The Secretary is authorized to enter into such agreements and promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and provisions of this title. (d) The secretary shall not investigate, promote or implement, pursuant to this title, any project intended to reclaim and reuse agricultural wastewater generated in the service area of the San Luis Unit of the Central Valley Project, California, except those measures recommended for action by the San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program in the report entitled A Management Plan for Agricultural Subsurface Drainage and Related Problems on the Westside San Joaquin Valley (September 1990). (e) Authorization of New Water Recycling and Reuse Projects.-- (1) Submission to the secretary.-- (A) In general.--Non-Federal interests may submit proposals for projects eligible to be authorized pursuant to this section in the form of completed feasibility studies to the Secretary. (B) Eligible projects.--A project shall be considered eligible for consideration under this section if the project reclaims and reuses-- (i) municipal, industrial, domestic, or agricultural wastewater; or (ii) impaired ground or surface waters. (C) Guidelines.--Within 60 days of the enactment of this Act the Secretary shall issue guidelines for feasibility studies for water recycling and reuse projects to provide sufficient information for the formulation of the studies. (2) Review by the secretary.--The Secretary shall review each feasibility study received under paragraph (1)(A) for the purpose of-- (A) determining whether the study, and the process under which the study was developed, each comply with Federal laws and regulations applicable to feasibility studies of water recycling and reuse projects; and (B) the project is technically and financially feasible and provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws. (3) Submission to congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of receipt of a feasibility study received under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that describes-- (A) the results of the Secretary's review of the study under paragraph (2), including a determination of whether the project is feasible; (B) any recommendations the Secretary may have concerning the plan or design of the project; and (C) any conditions the Secretary may require for construction of the project. (4) Eligibility for funding.--The non-Federal project sponsor of any project determined by the Secretary to be feasible under paragraph (3)(A) shall be eligible to apply to the Secretary for funding for the Federal share of the costs of planning, designing and constructing the project pursuant to subsection (f). (f) Competitive Grant Program for the Funding of Water Recycling and Reuse Projects.-- (1) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a competitive grant program under which the non-Federal project sponsor of any project determined by the Secretary to be feasible under subsection (e)(3)(A) shall be eligible to apply for funding for the planning, design, and construction of the project, subject to subsection (g)(2). (2) Priority.--When funding projects under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give funding priority to projects that meet one or more of the criteria listed in paragraph (3) and are located in an area that-- (A) has been identified by the United States Drought Monitor as experiencing severe, extreme, or exceptional drought at any time in the 4-year period before such funds are made available; or (B) was designated as a disaster area by a State during the 4-year period before such funds are made available. (3) Criteria.--The project criteria referred to in paragraph (2) are the following: (A) Projects that are likely to provide a more reliable water supply for States and local governments. (B) Projects that are likely to increase the water management flexibility and reduce impacts on environmental resources from projects operated by Federal and State agencies. (C) Projects that are regional in nature. (D) Projects with multiple stakeholders. (E) Projects that provide multiple benefits, including water supply reliability, eco-system benefits, groundwater management and enhancements, and water quality improvements. (g) Authorization of Appropriations.-- (1) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior an additional [$50,000,000] $167,500,000 to remain available until expended. (2) Projects can only receive funding if enacted appropriations legislation designates funding to them by name, after the Secretary recommends specific projects for funding pursuant to subsection (f) and transmits such recommendations to the appropriate committees of Congress. ---------- SECTION 4 OF THE WATER DESALINATION ACT OF 1996 SEC. 4. DESALINATION DEMONSTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT. (a) In General.--In order to further demonstrate the feasibility of desalination processes investigated either independently or in research conducted pursuant to section 3, the Secretary shall administer and conduct a demonstration and development program for water desalination and related activities, including the following: (1) Desalination plants and modules.--Conduct or contract for technical work, including the design, construction, and testing of plants and modules to develop desalination processes and concepts, including modules specifically designed for brine management. (2) Projects.-- (A) In general.--Subject to the requirements of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may participate in an eligible desalination project in an amount equal to not more than 25 percent of the total cost of the eligible desalination project. (B) Eligible desalination project.--The term ``eligible desalination project'' means any project in a Reclamation State, that-- (i) involves an ocean or brackish water desalination facility either constructed, operated and maintained; or sponsored by any State, department of a State, subdivision of a State or public agency organized pursuant to a State law; and (ii) provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws (including regulations). (C) State role.--Participation by the Secretary of the Interior in an eligible desalination project under this subsection shall not occur unless-- (i) the project is included in a state-approved plan or federal participation has been requested by the Governor of the State in which the eligible desalination project is located; and (ii) the State or local sponsor determines, and the Secretary of the Interior concurs, that-- (I) the eligible desalination project is technically and financially feasible and provides a Federal benefit in accordance with the reclamation laws; (II) sufficient non-Federal funding is available to complete the eligible desalination project; and (III) the eligible desalination project sponsors are financially solvent; and (iii) the Secretary of the Interior submits to Congress a written notification of these determinations within 30 days of making such determinations. (D) Environmental laws.--When participating in an eligible desalination project under this subsection, the Secretary shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). (E) Information.--When participating in an eligible desalination project under this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior-- (i) may rely on reports prepared by the sponsor of the eligible desalination project, including feasibility (or equivalent) studies, environmental analyses, and other pertinent reports and analyses; but (ii) shall retain responsibility for making the independent determinations described in subparagraph (C). (F) Authorization of appropriations.-- (i) [$30,000,000] $100,500,000 of funding is authorized to remain available until expended; and (ii) Projects can only receive funding if enacted appropriations legislation designates funding to them by name, after the Secretary recommends specific projects for funding pursuant to this subsection and transmits such recommendations to the appropriate committees of Congress. (3) Byproducts.--Study methods for the marketing of byproducts resulting from the desalting of water to offset the costs of treatment and to reduce environmental impacts of those byproducts. (4) Economic surveys.--Conduct economic studies and surveys to determine present and prospective costs of producing water for beneficial purposes in various locations by desalination processes compared to other methods. (b) Cooperative Agreements.--Federal participation in desalination activities may be conducted through cooperative agreements, including cost-sharing agreements, with non-Federal public utilities and State and local governmental agencies and other entities, in order to develop recommendations for Federal participation in processes and plants utilizing desalting technologies for the production of water. (c) Prioritization.--In carrying out demonstration and development activities under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize projects-- (1) for the benefit of drought-stricken States and communities; (2) for the benefit of States that have authorized funding for research and development of desalination technologies and projects; (3) that can reduce reliance on imported water supplies that have an impact on species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and (4) that demonstrably leverage the experience of international partners with considerable expertise in desalination, such as the State of Israel. (d) Water Production.--The Secretary shall provide, as part of the annual budget submission to Congress, an estimate of how much water has been produced and delivered in the past fiscal year using processes and facilities developed or demonstrated using assistance provided under sections 3 and 4. This submission shall include, to the extent practicable, available information on a detailed water accounting by process and facility and the cost per acre foot of water produced and delivered. Appropriations Not Authorized by Law Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1)(B) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following table lists the appropriations in the accompanying bill which are not authorized by law for the period concerned: [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Rescissions Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following table is submitted describing the rescissions recommended in the accompanying bill: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Department or Activity Amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and $17,000 Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration...... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Committee Hearings For the purposes of cl. 3(c)(6) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the following hearings were used to develop or consider the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025: The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies held a budget hearing on March 20, 2024, entitled ``FY 2025 Budget Request for the Department of Energy.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from: The Honorable Jennifer M. Granholm, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies held a budget hearing on April 17, 2024, entitled ``FY 2025 Budget Request for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Reclamation.'' The Subcommittee received testimony from: The Honorable Michael L. Connor, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon, Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The Honorable Camille Calimlim Touton, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation Mr. Michael Brain, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Water and Science The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies held a Member Day Hearing on April 10, 2024. The Subcommittee received testimony from: The Honorable James Moylan, Member of Congress The Honorable Greg Stanton, Member of Congress The Honorable Dina Titus, Member of Congress The Honorable Jim Costa, Member of Congress The Honorable John Garamendi, Member of Congress The Honorable Kevin Mullin, Member of Congress The Honorable Juan Ciscomani, Member of Congress The Honorable Sylvia Garcia, Member of Congress The Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies received written testimony from public witnesses. The Subcommittee received testimony from: Jack Waldorf, Executive Director, Western Governors' Association Don A. Barnett, Executive Director, Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum Shannon Angielski, President, Clean Hydrogen Future Coalition Sapna Gheewala Dowla, Associate VP Policy & Research, Alliance to Save Energy Alexander Ratner, Federal Policy Manager, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Craig H. Piercy, Executive Director/CEO, American Nuclear Society Amalia Corby, Federal Affairs Director, American Society for Microbiology Crispin Taylor, CEO of the American Society of Plant Biologists Michael J. Johnson, Advocacy Associate, Appliance Standards Awareness Project Lisa Jacobson, President, Business Council for Sustainable Energy Christopher S. Harris, Executive Director, Colorado River Board of California Corinne Sama, Chairman, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Earl Jackson, Deputy Manager/ Chief Financial Officer, Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Ewelina Czapla, Director of Energy Policy, Digital Power Network Pat Stanton, Executive Director, E4TheFuture Steve Skodak, CEO, Building Performance Association Larry Zarker, CEO, Building Performance Institute Genevieve Cullen, President, Electric Drive Transportation Association Dane Farrell, Director of Government Affairs, Federal Performance Contracting Coalition Ellen Kuo, Associate Director Legislative Affairs, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Trevor Baggiore, Water quality Division Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Sean Bradshaw, Chairman, Gas Turbine Association Anatha Krishnan, Senior Vice President, General Atomics Energy Group Colden Franklin, Government Affairs Director, Heat is Power Association Linda Ciocci, Executive Director, Hydropower Foundation Laura Kroeger, Executive Director, Mile High Flood District Ron Blacksmith, Core System Manager, Oglala Sioux Rural Water Supply System Chuck Jacobs, Distribution System Director, Oglala Sioux Rural Water Supply System Young Colombe, Manager, Rosebud Sioux Rural Water System Jim McCauley, Manager, Lower Brule Sioux Rural Water System Rolland P. Johnson, President, Muons Inc. David Terry, President, NASEO Mike A. Hamman, P.E. New Mexico State Engineer, State of New Mexico Office of the State Engineer Nez Perce Tribe Maria Korsnick, President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute Katrina McMurrian, Executive Director, Nuclear Waste Strategy Coalition Dr. Sven Leyffer, President, SIAM Dr. Alejandro Aceves, Vice President for Science Policy, SIAM Dr. Suzanne L. Weekes, Executive Director, SIAM Malcolm Woolf, President and CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute Jimmy Hague, Senior Water Policy Advisor, The Nature Conservancy Greg Fogel, Director of Government Affairs and Policy, WateReuse Association [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Source: H. Rept. 118-580 · govinfo
Action History
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8997 would be postponed.
-
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
-
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 8997.
-
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
-
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4785-4786)
-
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 8997 as unfinished business.
-
On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
-
Mr. Fleischmann moved that the committee rise.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 64, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Van Drew demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 64.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 63, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 63.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 62, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Van Drew demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Van Drew amendment No. 62.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 61.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tenney amendment No. 60.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roy amendment No. 56, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Roy demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 56.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 55.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roy amendment No. 54, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Roy demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roy amendment No. 54.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rosendale amendment No. 53, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rosendale demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rosendale amendment No. 53.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 51, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 51.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 50, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 50.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 49, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 49.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 48, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 48.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 47, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 47.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 46, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Perry demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 46.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 45, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Fleischmann demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 45.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 44, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 44.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 43, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 43.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Perry amendment No. 42, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Fitzpatrick demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Perry amendment No. 42.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 41.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 40.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 38.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 37.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 36, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kaptur demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 36.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ogles amendment No. 35.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCormick amendment No. 25.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Luna amendment No. 23.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson (TX) amendment No. 20.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Houlahan amendment No. 19.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hageman amendment No. 18.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Griffith amendment No. 17.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Beyer amendment No. 11.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Beyer amendment No. 10.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flood amendment No. 9.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brecheen amendment No. 4.
-
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1370, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Fleischmann amendment en bloc.
-
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 8997.
-
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1370 and Rule XVIII.
-
The Speaker designated the Honorable Brad R. Wenstrup to act as Chairman of the Committee.
-
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8997 and H.R. 8998. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8997 and H.R. 8998 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
-
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1370. (consideration: CR H4743-4785; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4747-4755)
-
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1370 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8997 and H.R. 8998. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8997 and H.R. 8998 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 480.
-
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 118-580, by Mr. Fleischmann.
-
Introduced in House
Sponsors
- Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 8997 do?
- Making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.
- Who sponsors HR 8997?
- HR 8997 is sponsored by Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 8997?
- This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 8997?
- Track HR 8997 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 8997
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 8997
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →