United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 4 R · 3 D cosponsors

HR 6485 — Skinny Labels, Big Savings Act

Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill proposes to create a new labeling system for certain products.

The bill aims to establish a labeling system that would simplify product information. It focuses on providing clear and concise labels to help consumers make better choices.

What this means for you
  • Consumers: This means you may see simpler labels that help you understand product information better.

Summary

Skinny Labels, Big Savings ActThis bill provides a statutory safe harbor from patent infringement claims for generic or biosimilar manufacturers that seek or obtain approval for skinny labels of their drugs.Under current law, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may approve generic and biosimilar drugs through a process known as skinny labeling, which allows a generic manufacturer to seek approval only for approved uses of the drug that are no longer protected by patents. However, in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., a court held that a generic manufacturer may sometimes be liable for patent infringement when it markets skinny label generics.The bill specifically lists the following as actions that are not considered infringement of a method of use claim in a patent under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:submitting or seeking approval of a skinny label for a generic or biosimilar drug;promoting or commercially marketing a drug with skinny labeling approved by the FDA; ordescribing a drug product approved by the FDA as a generic of, or therapeutically equivalent to, the branded drug.The bill also applies the safe harbor to similar actions under the Public Health Service Act.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill creates a safe harbor from infringement for certain method of use patents related to drugs and biological products.

  • 35 U.S.C. § 271

    (h)(1) The following shall not be acts of direct, induced, or contributory infringement of a method of use claim in a patent included in the list described in section 505(j)(7) or section 512(n)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(7), 360b(n)(4)) in an action or counterclaim under this section: (A) Submitting or seeking approval of an application under section 505(j) or section 512(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j), 360b(b)(2)), or submitting or seeking approval of an application described in section 505(b)(2) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(2)), provided that such application includes a statement under, as applicable, section 505(j)(2)(A)(viii), section 512(n)(1)(I), or section 505(b)(2)(B) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(2)(A)(viii), 360b(n)(1)(I), 355(b)(2)(B)) for the method of use claims in the patent with the labeling proposed in such application. (B) Promoting or commercially marketing a drug product with the labeling approved in an application described in subparagraph (A). (C) Describing a drug product approved in an application submitted under section 505(j) or section 512(b)(2) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j), 360b(b)(2)) or approved in an application described in section 505(b)(2) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(2)) as a generic of, or therapeutically equivalent to, the listed drug referenced in such application, as applicable. (2) Subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1) shall apply only if the labeling, promotion, or commercial marketing does not reference the condition or conditions of use claimed in the patent that was identified by the patent owner or assignee to the Secretary under section 314.53 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation) and that was subject to the statement under section 505(j)(2)(A)(viii), section 512(n)(1)(I), or section 505(b)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(2)(A)(viii), 360b(n)(1)(I), 355(b)(2)(B)), as applicable.

    This provision establishes that specific actions related to drug approval and marketing will not be infringing a method of use patent.

  • 35 U.S.C. § 271

    (i)(1) The following shall not be acts of direct, induced, or contributory infringement of a patent claim covering a method of using the reference product in an action or counterclaim under this section: (A) Submitting or seeking approval of an application under section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(k)). (B) Describing a biological product approved in an application described in subparagraph (A) as biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, the reference product, as applicable, with the labeling approved in such application, when the biological product has not been approved for the patented condition or conditions of use. (C) Promoting or commercially marketing a biological product with the labeling approved in an application described in subparagraph (A). (2) Subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1) shall apply only if the labeling, promotion, or commercial marketing does not reference the condition or conditions of use claimed in the patent and specifically reflected in the prescribing information.

    This provision similarly ensures certain actions regarding biological products are not considered infringement of associated method of use patents.

  • 35 U.S.C. § 271

    subsections (h) and (i) → subsections (k) and (l)

    This change reorganizes the subsections, moving existing subsections (h) and (i) to (k) and (l) respectively to accommodate the newly inserted provisions.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 540 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (540)

540 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 540 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 6485 do?
Skinny Labels, Big Savings ActThis bill provides a statutory safe harbor from patent infringement claims for generic or biosimilar manufacturers that seek or obtain approval for skinny labels of their drugs.Under current law, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may approve generic and biosimilar drugs through a process known as skinny labeling, which allows a generic manufacturer to seek approval only for approved uses of the drug that are no longer protected by patents. However, in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., a court held that a generic manufacturer may sometimes be liable for patent infringement when it markets skinny label generics.The bill specifically lists the following as actions that are not considered infringement of a method of use claim in a patent under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:submitting or seeking approval of a skinny label for a generic or biosimilar drug;promoting or commercially marketing a drug with skinny labeling approved by the FDA; ordescribing a drug product approved by the FDA as a generic of, or therapeutically equivalent to, the branded drug.The bill also applies the safe harbor to similar actions under the Public Health Service Act.
Who sponsors HR 6485?
HR 6485 is sponsored by Cline, Ben (Republican), Lofgren, Zoe (Democratic), Kiggans, Jennifer A. (Republican), Suozzi, Thomas R. (Democratic), Pfluger, August (Republican), Grothman, Glenn (Republican), and Craig, Angie (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 6485?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 6485?
Track HR 6485 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 6485

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 6485

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →