PBM Disclosure Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 3349 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 3349.
You're tracking S 3349
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 3349 — PBM Disclosure Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced December 04, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html December 04, 2025
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds clarification regarding disclosure requirements for compensation related to pharmacy benefit managers and third-party administrators.
-
29 U.S.C. 1108(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)(bb)
(CC) Pharmacy benefit management services provided by pharmacy benefit managers or other service providers and related services provided by third party administrators (or other entities providing such services) for which the covered service provider, an affiliate, or a subcontractor reasonably expects to receive indirect compensation or direct compensation described in item (dd).
This change explicitly includes pharmacy benefit management services in the compensation disclosure requirement.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sponsors
- Roger Marshall · Primary
- Lisa Blunt Rochester · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Marshall, Roger Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Blunt Rochester, Lisa Democratic
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 3349?
- S 3349 is sponsored by Marshall, Roger (Republican) and Blunt Rochester, Lisa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of S 3349?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced December 04, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 3349?
- Track S 3349 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 3349
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 3349
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →