End Judge Shopping Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 4096 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 4096.
You're tracking S 4096
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 4096 — End Judge Shopping Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2710)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html April 10, 2024
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds a new subsection to allow for the random assignment of certain civil cases in district courts.
-
28 U.S.C. § 137
(c) Random Assignment of Other Cases.-- (1) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `law' includes, with respect to an executive branch or a State or Federal agency, a rule, a regulation, a policy, and an order. (2) Random assignment.--Any civil action brought for declaratory, injunctive, or other equitable relief seeking (whether facially or as-applied) to challenge the constitutionality or lawfulness of, or to bar, restrain, vacate, set aside, or mandate the enforcement of, any provision of a Federal law on a nationwide basis, or any provision of a State law on a statewide basis in that State, shall be randomly assigned to a judge of the district court in which the civil action is filed.
This provision establishes a random assignment procedure for civil actions challenging the constitutionality of federal or state laws.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2710)
Sponsors
- Charles E. Schumer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Schumer, Charles E. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 4096?
- S 4096 is sponsored by Schumer, Charles E. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of S 4096?
- This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track S 4096?
- Track S 4096 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 4096
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 4096
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →