United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 12 D · 1 I cosponsors

S 3210 — EXPERTS Act of 2025

Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced November 19, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 13 sponsors

    1 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (12 D · 1 I) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

7 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill requires additional disclosure of conflicts of interest in rulemaking, thereby increasing transparency and accountability in the regulatory process.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553

    After notice required → (1) After notice required

    The bill adds a numerical designation to the sentence, indicating a new subsection will follow.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553(c)(1)

    , subject to subsections (f) and (h),

    This addition clarifies that the agency's obligations are subject to new requirements introduced later in the bill.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553(c)

    In the case of any submission under paragraph (1) by an interested person that includes a scientific, economic, or technical study or research (or a citation thereto) that the interested person funded directly or indirectly, or the nonpublic results of any scientific, economic, or technical study or research that the interested person funded directly or indirectly, the interested person shall disclose to the agency the following: The amount of any funds that were received by the person who conducted the study or research. The entity that provided the funds referred to in subparagraph (A). Any entity that was allowed to review or revise the study or research, and the extent of that review or revision. Any financial relationship between the person who conducted the study or research, and any person that would be affected by the proposed rule.

    This establishes disclosure requirements for interested persons submitting relevant studies that they funded.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553

    With respect to any submission by an interested person under subsection (c) or any other submission by an interested person relating to a proposed rule or final rule that includes a scientific, economic, or technical study or research by the interested person not published in a publicly available peer-reviewed publication, or any result of a scientific, economic, or technical study or research by the interested person not published in a publicly available peer-reviewed publication, the interested person, in making that submission, shall disclose to the agency-- the source of any funding for the study or research, as applicable; any entity that sponsored the study or research; the extent to which the findings of the study or research were reviewed by a person that may be affected by the rule making to which the submission relates; the identity of any person identified under paragraph (3); and the nature of any financial relationship, including a consulting agreement, the support of any expert witness, and the funding of research, between any person that conducted the study or research and any interested person with respect to the rule making to which the submission relates.

    This adds further requirements for disclosures related to studies not published in peer-reviewed journals.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553

    With respect to a study or research that is submitted by an interested person to an agency under subsection (c), the agency shall ensure that the study or research is available to the public (including on the internet website of the agency and on the public docket of the agency for the rule making) unless disclosure is exempted or excluded under section 552.

    This mandates public availability of submitted studies or research unless exempt.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553

    If a study or research submitted by an interested person to an agency under subsection (c) presents a conflict described in paragraph (2), the agency shall disclose the conflict to the public on the internet website of the agency and on the public docket of the agency, and by publication in the Federal Register, unless disclosure is exempted or excluded under section 552.

    This requires agencies to disclose conflicts related to submitted studies.

  • 5 U.S.C. § 553

    In the case of a violation of the requirement to make a disclosure under subsection (c)(2) or subsection (f) with respect to a submission or under subsection (h) with respect to a conflict related to a submission referred to under subsection (g), the agency may exclude from consideration or otherwise disregard the submission, and the agency has no obligation to respond to the submission, except that the submission may be remade with required disclosures during the opportunity for participation referred to in subsection (c)(1). Nothing in this subsection may be construed to affect the level of deference (in accordance with applicable law) accorded to agency action by a court reviewing such action.

    This provides agencies the ability to disregard submissions that do not meet disclosure requirements.

Action History

  1. Introduced in Senate

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 534 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (534)

534 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 534 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors S 3210?
S 3210 is sponsored by Warren, Elizabeth (Democratic), Welch, Peter (Democratic), Van Hollen, Chris (Democratic), Schiff, Adam B. (Democratic), Sanders, Bernard (Independent), Blumenthal, Richard (Democratic), Wyden, Ron (Democratic), Booker, Cory A. (Democratic), Merkley, Jeff (Democratic), Hirono, Mazie K. (Democratic), Luján, Ben Ray (Democratic), Markey, Edward J. (Democratic), and Kim, Andy (Democratic).
What is the current status of S 3210?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced November 19, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track S 3210?
Track S 3210 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 3210

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S 3210

Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →