HR 6436 — Stopping Pharma’s Ripoffs and Drug Savings For All Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
To amend title 35, United States Code, to prevent double patenting, and for other purposes.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html November 15, 2023
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill introduces a presumption of disclaimer for patent terms of certain drug patents after the expiration of the first patent, aimed at preventing double patenting.
-
35 U.S.C. § 253
(c) Disclaimers of Drug Patent Term.-- (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), in a proceeding challenging the validity of patents under section 505(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(c)) with respect to a drug, under section 351(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(l)) with respect to a biological product, or a Federal district court proceeding involving patents that are the subject of an action under section 271(e)(2), the patentee shall be presumed to have disclaimed the patent term for each of the listed patents after the date on which the term of the first patent expires, subject to the exceptions provided for in subsection (2). (2) Demonstration of distinct inventions.--If a patentee demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that certain patents described in paragraph (1) cover patentably distinct inventions from the invention claimed in the first such patent to expire, no part of the term of any such patent shall be presumed to have been disclaimed, and all patent term extensions granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office shall be respected, unless and to the extent the patentee expressly disclaims, in writing, the patent term for each such patent.
This addition establishes a new presumption that certain drug patents' terms are disclaimed after the first patent expires unless the patentee proves they are distinct inventions.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Patrick Ryan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ryan, Patrick Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 6436 do?
- To amend title 35, United States Code, to prevent double patenting, and for other purposes.
- Who sponsors HR 6436?
- HR 6436 is sponsored by Ryan, Patrick (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HR 6436?
- This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 6436?
- Track HR 6436 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 6436
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 6436
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →