United States 118th Congress Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

HR 6236 — Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act

Last action — Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

To streamline nuclear technology regulatory permitting and licensing, and for other purposes.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

9 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill amends existing law to streamline nuclear technology regulatory permitting and licensing processes, modify performance metrics timelines, and clarify regulations related to fusion reactors.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2231

    The provisions of → (a) `The provisions of

    The bill modifies the introductory clause to improve clarity and structure.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2231

    (b) Consistent with the declaration in section 1, the Commission shall provide for efficient, timely, and predictable reviews and proceedings for the granting, suspending, revoking, or amending of any license or construction permit, or application to transfer control, and in any proceeding for the issuance or modification of rules and regulations dealing with the activities of licenses.

    This addition mandates the Commission to ensure efficiency and predictability in licensing processes.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2235

    c. Application Reviews for Production and Utilization Facilities of an Existing Site.--In reviewing an application for an early site permit, construction permit, operating license, or combined construction permit and operating license for a production facility or utilization facility located at the site of a production facility or utilization facility licensed by the Commission, the Commission shall, to the extent practicable, use information that was part of the licensing basis of the licensed production facility or utilization facility.

    This change emphasizes using existing information for reviews of applications related to facilities at already licensed sites.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2215(c)

    180 → 90

    The bill reduces the timeline for performance metrics assessments from 180 days to 90 days.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2215(c)

    180 → 90

    This modification further enforces the 90-day standard for performance metrics reviews, promoting faster evaluations.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2133 note

    Not later → (A) In general.--Not later

    This amendment clarifies the introduction of a timeline requirement.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2133 note

    (B) Exclusion of fusion reactors.-- Notwithstanding section 3(1), for purposes of subparagraph (A), the term `advanced nuclear reactor applicant' does not include an applicant for a license for a nuclear fusion reactor.

    This addition explicitly excludes fusion reactor applicants from the definition of advanced nuclear reactor applicants.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2134(c)

    The Commission → (2) Regulation.--The Commission

    This change rephrases the starting sentence, restructuring the section for clarity.

  • 42 U.S.C. 2134(c)

    c. The Commission → c. Research and Development Activities. (1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Commission

    This change adds a title for clarity and structure regarding research and development activities.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  4. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (546)

546 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 546 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HR 6236 do?
To streamline nuclear technology regulatory permitting and licensing, and for other purposes.
Who sponsors HR 6236?
HR 6236 is sponsored by Allen, Rick W. (Republican).
What is the current status of HR 6236?
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HR 6236?
Track HR 6236 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 6236

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 6236

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →