Protecting Our Nation’s Capital Emergency Act of 2024
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 5798 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 5798.
You're tracking HR 5798
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 5798 — Protecting Our Nation’s Capital Emergency Act of 2024
Last action — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 735.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
Died in session
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
25 added · 32 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of HR 5798 changes the title from "Emergency Act of 2023" to "Emergency Act of 2024" and introduces additional sponsors for the bill. It removes the findings and purpose section that previously outlined specific crime statistics and trends in Washington, DC. This means that the current text no longer provides context regarding crime rates or the rationale for addressing crime in the Capitol.
5798 IntroducedReported in House (IH)](RH)] <DOC> 118thUnion CONGRESSCalendar 1stNo. Session H.
735 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
5798 To[Report restoreNo. the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
118-900] To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability _______________________________________________________________________December A18, BILL2024 ToAdditional restoresponsors: the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
Mr.
Rutherford, Mr.
Biggs, Mr.
Meuser, Mr.
Nickel, Mr.
Cuellar, Mr.
Stauber, Mr.
Miller of Ohio, Ms.
Van Duyne, Mr.
Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr.
Kean of New Jersey, and Mr.
Davis of North Carolina December 18, 2024 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on September 28, 2023] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Nation's Capital Emergency Act of 2023''.2024''.
FINDINGS;
PURPOSE.
(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) As of September 25, 2023, Washington, DC, had recorded 24,996 crimes committed within the city limits, up 30 percent or almost 5,400 crimes from the same date in 2022.
(2) As of September 25, 2023, 197 homicides had been committed in Washington, DC, up 29 percent from the same date in 2022 and nearly twice the total number of homicides in 2012.
(3) As of September 25, 2023, violent crime incidents in Washington, DC, are up over 37 percent from the same time in 2022, including 120 reports of sexual abuse (up 1 percent) and 2,545 reports of robberies (up 65 percent).
(4) As of September 25, 2023, there have been 5,262 reports of motor vehicle thefts in Washington, DC, up 107 percent from the same date in 2022.
(5) The Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia has lost over 1,200 members since 2020.
The total number of members is down 478 since 2020 and the staffing levels at the Department are the lowest they have been in over years.
(b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this Act to combat the rise in violent crime in our Nation's Capital by eliminating policies which place law enforcement personnel of the District of Columbia at risk and discourage them from serving, ensuring that such personnel will be treated equitably and fairly and the recruitment and retention of such personnel shall be increased.
SEC.
3.
(a) Restoration of Right Toto Negotiate Matters Pertaining to Discipline of District of Columbia Law Enforcement Officers Through Collective Bargaining.--Section 1708 of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (sec.
<all>Union Calendar No.
735 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
R.
5798 [Report No.
118-900] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ December 18, 2024 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
View plain text versions (2)
- Reported Reported in House Current html December 18, 2024
- Introduced Introduced in House html September 28, 2023
What Congress says this changes
H. Rept. 118-900Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.
Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.
changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): SECTION 1-617.08. OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE Sec. 1-617.08. Management rights; matters subject to collective bargaining. (a) The respective personnel authorities (management) shall retain the sole right, in accordance with applicable laws and rules and regulations: (1) To direct employees of the agencies; (2) To hire, promote, transfer, assign, and retain employees in positions within the agency and to suspend, demote, discharge, or take other disciplinary action against employees for cause; (3) To relieve employees of duties because of lack of work or other legitimate reasons; (4) To maintain the efficiency of the District government operations entrusted to them; (5) To determine: (A) The mission of the agency, its budget, its organization, the number of employees, and to establish the tour of duty; (B) The number, types, and grades of positions of employees assigned to an agency's organizational unit, work project, or tour of duty; (C) The technology of performing the agency's work; and (D) The agency's internal security practices; and (6) To take whatever actions may be necessary to carry out the mission of the District government in emergency situations. (a-1) An act, exercise, or agreement of the respective personnel authorities (management) shall not be interpreted in any manner as a waiver of the sole management rights contained in subsection (a) of this section. (b) All matters shall be deemed negotiable except those that are proscribed by this subchapter. Negotiations concerning compensation are authorized to the extent provided in Sec. 1- 617.16. [(c)(1) All matters pertaining to the discipline of sworn law enforcement personnel shall be retained by management and not be negotiable through bargaining, including substantive or impacts-and-effects bargaining. [(2) This subsection shall apply to any collective bargaining agreements entered into with the Fraternal Order of Police/ Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee after September 30, 2020, and to any collective bargaining agreements automatically renewed on or after September 30, 2020.] ---------- SUBTITLE M OF TITLE I OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PO- LICING AND JUSTICE REFORM AMENDMENT ACT OF 2022 [Subtitle M--OFFICER DISCIPLINE REFORMS [Sec. 117. Section 502 of the Omnibus Public Safety Agency Reform Amendment Act of 2004, effective September 30, 2004 (D.C. Law 15-194; D.C. Official Code Sec. 5-1031), is amended as follows: [(a) Subsection (a-1) is repealed. [(b) Subsection (b) is amended to read as follows: [ ``(b) If the act or occurrence allegedly constituting cause is the subject of a criminal investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department or any law enforcement or prosecuting agency with jurisdiction within the United States, the Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, or the Office of the Attorney General, or is the subject of an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General or the Office of the District of Columbia Auditor, the 90-day period for commencing a corrective or adverse action under subsection (a) of this section shall be tolled until the conclusion of the investigation.''. [(c) A new subsection (c) is added to read as follows: [``(c)(1) MPD shall publish, on a publicly accessible website, a schedule of adverse action hearings for cases in which the proposed discipline is termination. [(2) The schedule shall include: [(A) The date, time, and location of the hearing; [(B) The name and badge number of the subject officer; and [(C) A summary of the alleged misconduct or charges against the subject officer.''. [Sec. 118. Section 6-A1001.5 of Chapter 10 of Title 6 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations is amended by striking the phrase ``reduce the penalty'' and inserting the phrase ``reduce or increase the penalty'' in its place.]
Source: H. Rept. 118-900 · govinfo
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill restores collective bargaining rights for law enforcement discipline and reinstates the statute of limitations for disciplinary cases against Metropolitan Police Department personnel.
-
Section 1708 of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (sec. 1-617.08, D.C. Official Code)
subsection (c)This change restores the ability for law enforcement officers in D.C. to negotiate disciplinary matters.
Action History
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. H. Rept. 118-900.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Accountability. H. Rept. 118-900.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 735.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 19.
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Sponsors
- Anthony D'Esposito · Cosponsor
- John H. Rutherford · Cosponsor
- Andy Biggs · Cosponsor
- Daniel Meuser · Cosponsor
- Wiley Nickel · Cosponsor
- Henry Cuellar · Cosponsor
- Pete Stauber · Cosponsor
- Max L. Miller · Cosponsor
- Beth Van Duyne · Cosponsor
- Mike Kelly · Cosponsor
- Thomas H. Kean · Cosponsor
- Donald G. Davis · Cosponsor
- Andrew R. Garbarino · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 534 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Garbarino, Andrew R. Republican
Co-sponsors (12)
- D'Esposito, Anthony Republican
- Rutherford, John H. Republican
- Biggs, Andy Republican
- Meuser, Daniel Republican
- Nickel, Wiley Democratic
- Cuellar, Henry Democratic
- Stauber, Pete Republican
- Miller, Max L. Republican
- Van Duyne, Beth Republican
- Kelly, Mike Republican
- Kean, Thomas H. Republican
- Davis, Donald G. Democratic
Not signed on (534)
534 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 534 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 5798 do?
- To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
- Who sponsors HR 5798?
- HR 5798 is sponsored by D'Esposito, Anthony (Republican), Rutherford, John H. (Republican), Biggs, Andy (Republican), Meuser, Daniel (Republican), Nickel, Wiley (Democratic), Cuellar, Henry (Democratic), Stauber, Pete (Republican), Miller, Max L. (Republican), Van Duyne, Beth (Republican), Kelly, Mike (Republican), Kean, Thomas H. (Republican), Davis, Donald G. (Democratic), and Garbarino, Andrew R. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 5798?
- This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 5798?
- Track HR 5798 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 5798
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 5798
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →