United States 116th Congress Status: Passed House 1 D cosponsors

HRES 393 — Remembering the victims of the violent suppression of democracy protests in Tiananmen Square and elsewhere in China on June 3 and 4, 1989, and calling on the Government of the People's Republic of China to respect the universally recognized human rights of all people living in China and around the world.

Last action — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 116th Congress. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

49 added · 75 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of H. Res. 393 adds context regarding the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, specifically mentioning the impact on U.S.-China relations and the lack of justice for victims. It expresses sympathy for the families affected and supports the leaders of the demonstrations, advocating for political reform and human rights in China. The changes emphasize remembrance and solidarity, as well as a clearer call for accountability from the Chinese government.

→
Previous
Latest
393 Introduced in House (IH)] <DOC> 116th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
393 Engrossed in House (EH)] <DOC> H.
RES.
Res.
393 Remembering the victims of the violent suppression of democracy protests in Tiananmen Square and elsewhere in China on June 3 and 4, 1989, and calling on the Government of the People's Republic of China to respect the universally recognized human rights of all people living in China and around the world.
393 In the House of Representatives, U.
_______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 21, 2019 Mr.
S., June 4, 2019.
McGovern (for himself, Mr.
Whereas, on June 4, 1989, a violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrations held in and around Beijing's Tiananmen Square was carried out by the People's Liberation Army, following orders given by the Government of the People's Republic of China;
Smith of New Jersey, Mr.
Suozzi, Mr.
Malinowski, Ms.
Wild, Mr.
Espaillat, Mr.
Cicilline, Mr.
Bera, Mr.
Allred, Mr.
Deutch, Mr.
Keating, Mr.
Connolly, Ms.
Schrier, Mr.
Vargas, Mrs.
Torres of California, Ms.
Eshoo, Mr.
Sherman, Mrs.
Wagner, and Mr.
Mast) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Remembering the victims of the violent suppression of democracy protests in Tiananmen Square and elsewhere in China on June 3 and 4, 1989, and calling on the Government of the People's Republic of China to respect the universally recognized human rights of all people living in China and around the world.
Whereas June 4, 2019, marks the 30th anniversary of the violent crackdown on peaceful demonstrations held in and around Beijing's Tiananmen Square by the People's Liberation Army, carrying out the orders of the Government of the People's Republic of China;
and Whereas the United States Congress annually observes the 1989 Tiananmen demonstrations and their violent suppression-- (1) because of the enduring impact this historical episode has had on United States-China relations;
and Whereas this historical episode has had an enduring impact on United States- China relations-- (1) because there has been no justice for those who lost their lives seeking freedom and political reform during the Spring of 1989;
(2) because there has been no justice for those who lost their lives seeking freedom and political reform during the Spring of 1989;
(2) because the Government of the People's Republic of China censors research, discussion and commemoration of Tiananmen in China;
(3) because the Government of the People's Republic of China censors research, discussion and commemoration of Tiananmen in China;
(3) because the demonstrations showed that the ideas of democracy and freedom, human rights and the rule of law are not foreign to the people of China;
(4) because the demonstrations showed that the ideas of democracy and freedom, human rights and the rule of law are not foreign to the people of China;
(4) because the demonstrations and their violent suppression showed the lengths to which the leaders of the Government of the People's Republic of China will go to suppress universally recognized rights and to maintain their hold on power;
(5) because the demonstrations and their violent suppression showed the lengths to which the leaders of the Government of the People's Republic of China will go to suppress universally recognized rights and to maintain their hold on power;
and (5) because, despite persistent, ongoing, and sometimes brutal repression, there continue to be Chinese citizens bravely seeking to exercise universally recognized human rights, ensure the rule of law, and promote political reform thus carrying on the legacy of the Tiananmen demonstrations:
and (6) because, despite persistent, ongoing, and sometimes brutal repression, there continue to be Chinese citizens bravely seeking to exercise universally recognized human rights, ensure the rule of law, and promote political reform thus carrying on the legacy of the Tiananmen demonstrations:
Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) expresses sympathy and solidarity to the families of those killed, tortured, and imprisoned for their participation in the pro- democracy demonstrations during the spring of 1989 in Beijing and in other cities across the People's Republic of China;
Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives-- (1) expresses sympathy and solidarity to the families of those killed, tortured, and imprisoned for their participation in the pro-democracy demonstrations during the spring of 1989 in Beijing and in other cities across the People's Republic of China;
<all>
Attest:
Clerk.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  4. Mr. Malinowski moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution, as amended.

  5. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4231-4236)

  6. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 393.

  7. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  8. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4291-4292)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 423 - 0 (Roll no. 238).(text: CR H4231-4232)

  10. On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 423 - 0 (Roll no. 238). (text: CR H4231-4232)

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (546)

546 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 546 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HRES 393?
HRES 393 is sponsored by McGovern, James P. (Democratic).
What is the current status of HRES 393?
This bill died with 116th Congress. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HRES 393?
Track HRES 393 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HRES 393

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HRES 393

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →