Due Process Protections Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 1380 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 1380.
You're tracking S 1380
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 1380 — Due Process Protections Act
Last action — Became Public Law No: 116-182.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 08, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
29 added · 31 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment adds a reference to "Public Law 116-182" and specifies that the judge in a criminal proceeding will issue both an oral and written order confirming the prosecutor's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland. This change emphasizes the importance of these obligations and clarifies that a model order can be promulgated by the district court as needed. The practical effect is that courts now have a clearer framework for ensuring compliance with disclosure requirements in criminal cases.
[Congressional[116th BillsCongress 116thPublic Congress]Law 182] [From the U.S.
Government Publishing Office] [S.[[Page 134 STAT.
1380894]] EngrossedPublic inLaw Senate116-182 (ES)]116th <DOC>Congress 116thAn CONGRESSAct 2dTo Sessionamend S.the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.
1380<<NOTE: _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.
BeOct. it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.
SHORT21, TITLE.- [S.
1380]>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE:
Due Process Protections Act.>> SECTION 1.
<<NOTE:
18 USC app.
61 note.>> SHORT TITLE.
Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is<<NOTE: amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g);
18 USC app.
5.>> is amended-- (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g);
83 (1963) and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating such order under applicable law.
PassedApproved theOctober Senate21, May 20, 2020.
Attest:LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.
Secretary.1380:
116th--------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONGRESSCONGRESSIONAL 2dRECORD, SessionVol. S.
1380166 _______________________________________________________________________(2020): AN ACT To amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to remind prosecutors of their obligations under Supreme Court case law.
May 20, considered and passed Senate.
Sept.
21, considered and passed House.
<all>
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Public Law Current html October 22, 2020
- Engrossed Engrossed in Senate html May 20, 2020
- Introduced Introduced in Senate html May 08, 2019
- Enrolled Enrolled Bill html
Action History
-
Signed by President.
-
Signed by President.
-
Became Public Law No: 116-182.
-
Became Public Law No: 116-182.
-
Presented to President.
-
Presented to President.
-
Ms. Jackson Lee moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
-
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4582-4583)
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 1380.
-
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
-
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4582)
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
-
Received in the House.
-
Held at the desk.
-
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
-
Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2559)
-
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S2559)
-
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S2559)
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Dan Sullivan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sullivan, Dan Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 1380?
- S 1380 is sponsored by Sullivan, Dan (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 1380?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 08, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track S 1380?
- Track S 1380 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 1380
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 1380
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →