Protect Our Military Families' 2nd Amendment Rights Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 394 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 394.
You're tracking S 394
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 394 — Protect Our Military Families' 2nd Amendment Rights Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Protect Our Military Families' 2nd Amendment Rights Act This bill amends the federal criminal code to allow a licensed gun dealer, importer, or manufacturer to sell or ship a firearm to the spouse of a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty. (Current law already allows a licensed dealer, importer, or manufacturer to sell a firearm to a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty.) The bill also specifies that, for purposes of federal firearms laws, a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty, or his or her spouse, is a resident of the state in which: (1) the member or spouse maintains legal residence, (2) the permanent duty station of the member is located, and (3) the member maintains a home from which he or she commutes to the permanent duty station.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html February 15, 2017
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill expands the rights of members of the Armed Forces and their spouses concerning the receipt of firearms and clarifies their residency status for firearms laws.
-
18 U.S.C. § 925(a)(3)
members,→ members and spouses,The amendment allows both members of the Armed Forces and their spouses to receive firearms at the duty station.
-
18 U.S.C. § 925(a)(3)
members or→ members, spouses, orThis change clarifies that the rights extend to spouses in addition to members for receipt of firearms.
-
18 U.S.C. § 925(a)(3)
member or→ member, spouse, orThis expands the description to include spouses related to firearm receipt.
-
18 U.S.C. § 925(a)(3)
or to→ , or to the spouse of such a member,This explicitly acknowledges the spouse’s rights in relation to firearm receipt.
-
18 U.S.C. § 921(b)
the State in which the member maintains legal residence;→ the State in which the member or spouse maintains legal residence;This clarifies that both the member and spouse can be considered residents for firearms law purposes.
-
18 U.S.C. § 921(b)
the State in which the permanent duty station of the member is located;→ the State in which the permanent duty station of the member or spouse is located;This ensures that spouses are recognized in residency determination related to duties.
-
18 U.S.C. § 921(b)
the State in which the member maintains a place of abode from which the member commutes each day to the permanent duty station of the member.→ the State in which the member or spouse maintains a place of abode from which the member or spouse commutes each day to the permanent duty station of the member.This aligns the residency definitions for both members and spouses for commuting.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Sponsors
- John Thune · Cosponsor
- James M. Inhofe · Cosponsor
- Mike Crapo · Cosponsor
- James Lankford · Cosponsor
- Marco Rubio · Cosponsor
- Lindsey Graham · Cosponsor
- Cory Gardner · Cosponsor
- Michael B. Enzi · Cosponsor
- Bill Cassidy · Cosponsor
- Joni Ernst · Cosponsor
- Ted Cruz · Cosponsor
- Mike Rounds · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 535 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rounds, Mike Republican
Co-sponsors (11)
- Thune, John Republican
- Inhofe, James M. Republican
- Crapo, Mike Republican
- Lankford, James Republican
- Rubio, Marco Republican
- Graham, Lindsey Republican
- Gardner, Cory Republican
- Enzi, Michael B. Republican
- Cassidy, Bill Republican
- Ernst, Joni Republican
- Cruz, Ted Republican
Not signed on (535)
535 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 535 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 394 do?
- Protect Our Military Families' 2nd Amendment Rights Act This bill amends the federal criminal code to allow a licensed gun dealer, importer, or manufacturer to sell or ship a firearm to the spouse of a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty. (Current law already allows a licensed dealer, importer, or manufacturer to sell a firearm to a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty.) The bill also specifies that, for purposes of federal firearms laws, a member of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty, or his or her spouse, is a resident of the state in which: (1) the member or spouse maintains legal residence, (2) the permanent duty station of the member is located, and (3) the member maintains a home from which he or she commutes to the permanent duty station.
- Who sponsors S 394?
- S 394 is sponsored by Thune, John (Republican), Inhofe, James M. (Republican), Crapo, Mike (Republican), Lankford, James (Republican), Rubio, Marco (Republican), Graham, Lindsey (Republican), Gardner, Cory (Republican), Enzi, Michael B. (Republican), Cassidy, Bill (Republican), Ernst, Joni (Republican), Cruz, Ted (Republican), and Rounds, Mike (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 394?
- This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track S 394?
- Track S 394 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 394
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 394
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →