Allowing Greater Access to Safe and Effective Contraception Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 421 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 421.
You're tracking HR 421
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 421 — Allowing Greater Access to Safe and Effective Contraception Act
Last action — Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Allowing Greater Access to Safe and Effective Contraception Act This bill requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prioritize review of supplemental drug applications (applications to modify the approved use of a drug) for contraceptive drugs intended for routine use that would be available to individuals aged 18 and older without a prescription. The FDA must waive user fees for such supplemental drug applications. Any drug that is eligible for this priority review must be a prescription drug for individuals under age 18. This bill repeals provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 to allow health savings accounts and health flexible spending accounts (HFSAs) to be used to pay for medicine without a prescription and to remove the limit on salary reduction contributions to a HFSA under a cafeteria plan, effective as if the provisions had never been enacted.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html January 10, 2017
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes priority review for certain contraceptive drugs and waives fees for their applications, while repealing specific provisions related to contraceptive prescriptions and health savings accounts from previous laws.
-
21 U.S.C. 355
shall give priority review to any supplemental application submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)) for a contraceptive drug, provided that-- (1) the supplemental application is with respect to a drug intended for routine use; and (2) if the supplemental application is approved, with respect to individuals aged 18 and older, such drug would not be subject to section 503(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)).
This change allows for expedited review of contraceptive drugs that are intended for routine use.
-
21 U.S.C. 379h(a)(1)
The Secretary shall waive the fee under section 736(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379h(a)(1)) with respect to a supplemental application that receives priority review under subsection (a).
This change eliminates the fee for certain supplemental applications receiving priority review.
-
21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to individuals under age 18, a contraceptive drug that is eligible for priority review under subsection (a) shall be subject to section 503(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1)).
This provision maintains prescription requirements for contraceptive drugs for individuals under 18.
-
Public Law 111-148 Section 9003
Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), and the amendments made by such section, are repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.This change removes limitations on contraceptive prescriptions.
-
Public Law 111-148 Sections 9005 and 10902
Sections 9005 and 10902 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) and section 1403 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), and the amendments made by such sections, are repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such sections, and amendments, had never been enacted.This change removes restrictions on health flexible spending accounts for contraceptive use.
Action History
-
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
-
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
-
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsors
- Mia B. Love · Primary
- Barbara Comstock · Cosponsor
- Chris Stewart · Cosponsor
- Mike Coffman · Cosponsor
- Adam Kinzinger · Cosponsor
- David Young · Cosponsor
- Don Bacon · Cosponsor
- Doug LaMalfa · Cosponsor
- John J. Faso · Cosponsor
- Martha McSally · Cosponsor
- Garrett, Thomas A., Jr. · Cosponsor
- Jaime Herrera Beutler · Cosponsor
- Jason Chaffetz · Cosponsor
- Elise M. Stefanik · Cosponsor
- John R. Curtis · Cosponsor
- Darrell Issa · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 531 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Love, Mia B. Republican
Co-sponsors (15)
- Comstock, Barbara Republican
- Stewart, Chris Republican
- Coffman, Mike Republican
- Kinzinger, Adam Republican
- Young, David Republican
- Bacon, Don Republican
- LaMalfa, Doug Republican
- Faso, John J. Republican
- McSally, Martha Republican
- Garrett, Thomas A., Jr. Republican
- Herrera Beutler, Jaime Republican
- Chaffetz, Jason Republican
- Stefanik, Elise M. Republican
- Curtis, John R. Republican
- Issa, Darrell Republican
Not signed on (531)
531 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 531 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 421 do?
- Allowing Greater Access to Safe and Effective Contraception Act This bill requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prioritize review of supplemental drug applications (applications to modify the approved use of a drug) for contraceptive drugs intended for routine use that would be available to individuals aged 18 and older without a prescription. The FDA must waive user fees for such supplemental drug applications. Any drug that is eligible for this priority review must be a prescription drug for individuals under age 18. This bill repeals provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 to allow health savings accounts and health flexible spending accounts (HFSAs) to be used to pay for medicine without a prescription and to remove the limit on salary reduction contributions to a HFSA under a cafeteria plan, effective as if the provisions had never been enacted.
- Who sponsors HR 421?
- HR 421 is sponsored by Love, Mia B. (Republican), Comstock, Barbara (Republican), Stewart, Chris (Republican), Coffman, Mike (Republican), Kinzinger, Adam (Republican), Young, David (Republican), Bacon, Don (Republican), LaMalfa, Doug (Republican), Faso, John J. (Republican), McSally, Martha (Republican), Garrett, Thomas A., Jr. (Republican), Herrera Beutler, Jaime (Republican), Chaffetz, Jason (Republican), Stefanik, Elise M. (Republican), Curtis, John R. (Republican), and Issa, Darrell (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 421?
- This bill died with 115th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 421?
- Track HR 421 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 421
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 421
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →