Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions.
This bill deals with the process of class action lawsuits, allowing civil actions to be filed on behalf of multiple persons. Specific details about requirements or procedures are not available as the bill text is not provided.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB449 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB449.
You're tracking HB449
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB449 — Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions.
Last action — Governor's Veto Received by House
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Glenn Youngkin (Republican) on March 12, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill addresses civil actions filed on behalf of multiple people in class actions.
This bill deals with the process of class action lawsuits, allowing civil actions to be filed on behalf of multiple persons. Specific details about requirements or procedures are not available as the bill text is not provided.
Summary
Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB449 on the official Virginia source →Compared against the Code of Virginia as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 1 section(s) of the Code of Virginia: 8.01-267.10.
-
8.01-267.10
A.
Inserts “A.”.
-
8.01-267.10
One or more members of a class may
Inserts “One or more members of a class may”.
-
8.01-267.10
, as representative parties on behalf of all members,
Inserts “, as representative parties on behalf of all members,”.
-
8.01-267.10
bring a civil action or may
Inserts “bring a civil action or may”.
-
8.01-267.10
be proceeded against in a civil action
Inserts “be proceeded against in a civil action”.
-
8.01-267.10
,
Inserts “,”.
-
8.01-267.10
provided that
Inserts “provided that”.
-
8.01-267.10
:
Inserts “:”.
-
8.01-267.10
1. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members
Inserts “1. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members”.
-
8.01-267.10
is impracticable;
Inserts “is impracticable;”.
-
8.01-267.10
2. There are questions of law or fact common to the class;
Inserts “2. There are questions of law or fact common to the class;”.
-
8.01-267.10
3. The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and
Inserts “3. The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and”.
-
8.01-267.10
4. The representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
Inserts “4. The representative parties shall fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”.
-
8.01-267.10
B.
Inserts “B.”.
-
8.01-267.10
A
Inserts “A”.
-
8.01-267.10
n action may be certified as a class action
Inserts “n action may be certified as a class action”.
-
8.01-267.10
if
Inserts “if”.
-
8.01-267.10
all the requirements of subsection A are
Inserts “all the requirements of subsection A are”.
-
8.01-267.10
satisfied and
Inserts “satisfied and”.
-
8.01-267.10
if
Inserts “if”.
-
8.01-267.10
:
Inserts “:”.
-
8.01-267.10
1. Prosecuting
Inserts “1. Prosecuting”.
-
8.01-267.10
separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of (i) inconsistent or varying adjudications
Inserts “separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of (i) inconsistent or varying adjudications”.
-
8.01-267.10
of individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the opposing party or
Inserts “of individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the opposing party or”.
-
8.01-267.10
(ii) adjudications
Inserts “(ii) adjudications”.
-
8.01-267.10
of individual class members that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members
Inserts “of individual class members that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members”.
-
8.01-267.10
that
Inserts “that”.
-
8.01-267.10
are
Inserts “are”.
-
8.01-267.10
not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests
Inserts “not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests”.
-
8.01-267.10
;
Inserts “;”.
-
8.01-267.10
2. The party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that the final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate to the class as a whole; or
Inserts “2. The party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that the final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate to the class as a whole; or”.
-
8.01-267.10
3. The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.
Inserts “3. The court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.”.
-
8.01-267.10
In making this finding, the court may consider (i) the class members' interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions
Inserts “In making this finding, the court may consider (i) the class members' interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions”.
-
8.01-267.10
,
Inserts “,”.
-
8.01-267.10
(ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members
Inserts “(ii) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members”.
-
8.01-267.10
,
Inserts “,”.
-
8.01-267.10
(iii) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in a particular forum
Inserts “(iii) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in a particular forum”.
-
8.01-267.10
,
Inserts “,”.
-
8.01-267.10
(iv) the likely difficulties in managing a class action
Inserts “(iv) the likely difficulties in managing a class action”.
-
8.01-267.10
,
Inserts “,”.
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
H Governor's Veto Received by House
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., May 23, 2026
-
H Communicated to Governor
-
H Passed by for the day
-
H Passed by for the day
-
H Governor's substitute printed (HB449H2)
-
H Governor's substitute printed (HB449H2)
-
Governor's Recommendation
-
Governor's recommendation received by House
-
Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 13, 2026
-
H Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 14, 2026
-
H Signed by Speaker
-
H Enrolled
-
S Signed by President
-
H Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB449)
-
H Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB449ER)
-
H Enrolled
-
S Passed Senate (22-Y 18-N 0-A)
-
S Read third time
-
S Passed by for the day (Voice Vote)
-
S Constitutional reading dispensed (on 2nd reading) (40-Y 0-N 0-A)
-
S Rules suspended
-
S Reported from Finance and Appropriations (9-Y 5-N)
-
H Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB449)
-
S Rereferred to Finance and Appropriations
-
S Reported from Courts of Justice and rereferred to Finance and Appropriations (10-Y 4-N)
-
H Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB449)
-
S Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
S Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading)
-
H Read third time and passed House (64-Y 34-N 0-A)
-
H Engrossed by House - committee substitute
-
H committee substitute agreed to
-
H Read second time
-
H Read first time
-
H Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (14-Y 6-N)
-
H Placed on Courts of Justice Agenda
-
H Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (7-Y 3-N)
-
H House subcommittee offered
-
H Placed on Courts of Justice Agenda
-
H Assigned HCJ sub: Civil
-
H Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
H Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26105384D
Sponsors
- Marcus B. Simon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 52 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Nay |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Christie New Craig | — | Nay |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Nay |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Nay |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Nay |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jennifer D. Carroll Foy | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kannan Srinivasan | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Luther Cifers, III | — | Nay |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Nay |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Nay |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Nay |
| Timmy French | — | Nay |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Nay |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Not Voting |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron R. Rouse | — | Yea |
| Angelia Williams Graves | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Christie New Craig | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Danica A. Roem | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth B. Bennett-Parker | — | Yea |
| Emily M. Jordan | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| J.D. "Danny" Diggs | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jennifer D. Carroll Foy | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| Kannan Srinivasan | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Luther Cifers, III | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Jones | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Schuyler T. VanValkenburg | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Stella G. Pekarsky | — | Yea |
| T. Travis Hackworth | — | Yea |
| Tammy Brankley Mulchi | — | Yea |
| Tara A. Durant | — | Yea |
| Timmy French | — | Yea |
| Todd E. Pillion | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 27% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jennifer D. Carroll Foy | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Lashrecse D. Aird | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Nay |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Nay |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Nay |
| Russet Perry | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Nay |
| Saddam Azlan Salim | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 34 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 64 | 34 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 34% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (100)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Not Voting |
| Charlie Schmidt | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Nay |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Justin Pence | — | Nay |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karen R. "Kacey" Carnegie | — | Yea |
| Karrie K. Delaney | — | Yea |
| Katrina Callsen | — | Yea |
| Leslie Chambers Mehta | — | Yea |
| Madison Whittle | — | Nay |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Michelle Lopes Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Patrick A. Hope | — | Yea |
| Phil M. Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Rae Cousins | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Virgil Thornton | — | Yea |
| Vivian E. Watts | — | Yea |
| Will Davis | — | Nay |
| Wren M. Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atoosa R. Reaser | — | Yea |
| James A. "Jay" Leftwich | — | Nay |
| Jason S. Ballard | — | Nay |
| Karen Keys-Gamarra | — | Yea |
| Karen R. "Kacey" Carnegie | — | Yea |
| Marcus B. Simon | — | Yea |
| Michelle Lopes Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Nay |
| Virgil Thornton | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB449 do?
- Civil actions filed on behalf of multiple persons; class actions.
- Who sponsors HB449?
- HB449 is sponsored by Marcus B. Simon.
- What is the current status of HB449?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 12, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB449?
- Track HB449 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB449
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB449
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →