Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 5720 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 5720.
You're tracking HR 5720
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 5720 — Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act
Last action — Received in the Senate.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
Died in session
This bill died with 117th Congress. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act This bill requires federal judicial officers to file periodic transaction reports disclosing certain securities transactions. The bill also requires online publication of judicial financial disclosure reports. Specifically, the bill requires federal judicial officers to file reports within 45 days after a purchase, sale, or exchange that exceeds $1,000 in stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of securities. Additionally, the bill directs the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to establish a searchable internet database of judicial financial disclosure reports. The office must, within 90 days of the date by which a report must be filed, make the report available on the database in a searchable, sortable, and downloadable format. The bill does not require the immediate and unconditional availability of reports filed by a judicial officer or employee if the Judicial Conference finds that revealing personal and sensitive formation could endanger that individual or a family member of that individual.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
8 added · 3 removedPlain-language change summary
The text of the bill has been amended to update the reference from “and (d)” to “and (e)” in the last sentence of a section related to 1978 (5 U.S.C. App). This change clarifies or modifies how that section is structured or applied.
5720 EngrossedReceived in HouseSenate (EH)](RDS)] <DOC> 117th CONGRESS 1st Session H.
5720 _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 2, 2021 Received _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to provide for a periodic transaction reporting requirement for Federal judicial officers and the online publication of financial disclosure reports of Federal judicial officers, and for other purposes.
Clerk.CHERYL L.
117thJOHNSON, CONGRESSClerk. 1st Session H.
R.
5720 _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to provide for a periodic transaction reporting requirement for Federal judicial officers and the online publication of financial disclosure reports of Federal judicial officers, and for other purposes.
View plain text versions (4)
- Received in Senate View text Current html December 02, 2021
- Engrossed Engrossed in House html December 01, 2021
- Reported Reported in House html December 01, 2021
- Introduced Introduced in House html October 25, 2021
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds a periodic transaction reporting requirement for federal judicial officers and mandates the online publication of their financial disclosure reports.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 103(l)
(11) Each judicial officer.
Adds judicial officers to the list of individuals required to report periodic transactions.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 105
(c) Online Publication of Financial Disclosure Reports of Judicial Officers.-- (1) Establishment of database.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall establish a searchable internet database to enable public access to any report required to be filed by a judicial officer under this title. (2) Availability.--Not later than 90 days after the date on which a report is required to be filed under this title by a judicial officer, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall make the report available on the database established under paragraph (1) in a full-text searchable, sortable, and downloadable format for access by the public. (3) Redaction.--Any report made available on the database established under paragraph (1) shall not contain any information that is redacted in accordance with subsection (b)(3).
Creates a requirement for the online publication of financial disclosure reports for judicial officers.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 103(l)
, as defined under section 109(12)Removes the reference to the definition under section 109(12) for clarity.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 103(l)
, as defined under section 109(13)Removes the reference to the definition under section 109(13) for clarity.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 105(a)(1)
be revealing→ by revealingCorrects the phrasing of a sentence for grammatical accuracy.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 105(b)(1)
be,,→ be,Corrects a typographical error in the text.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 105(b)(1)
may be may→ may be, mayClarifies the sentence by correcting a repetition error.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 105(b)(3)(A)
described in section 109(8) or 109(10) of this Act→ who is a judicial officer or a judicial employeeUpdates the language to specify the roles of individuals covered.
-
5 U.S.C. App. Section 107(a)(1)
and (d)→ and (e)Updates the citation for consistency following the redesignation of subsections.
Action History
-
Received in the Senate.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-199.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-199.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 143.
-
Mr. Nadler moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
-
Considered under suspension of the rules.
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5720.
-
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
-
Considered as unfinished business.
-
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 422 - 4 (Roll No. 392).
-
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 422 - 4 (Roll No. 392).
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Darrell Issa · Cosponsor
- Henry C. "Hank" Johnson · Cosponsor
- Jerrold Nadler · Cosponsor
- Chip Roy · Cosponsor
- Sheila Jackson Lee · Cosponsor
- Ralph Norman · Cosponsor
- Sylvia R. Garcia · Cosponsor
- Deborah K. Ross · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 539 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ross, Deborah K. Democratic
Co-sponsors (7)
- Issa, Darrell Republican
- Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" Democratic
- Nadler, Jerrold Democratic
- Roy, Chip Republican
- Jackson Lee, Sheila Democratic
- Norman, Ralph Republican
- Garcia, Sylvia R. Democratic
Not signed on (539)
539 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 539 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 5720 do?
- Courthouse Ethics and Transparency Act This bill requires federal judicial officers to file periodic transaction reports disclosing certain securities transactions. The bill also requires online publication of judicial financial disclosure reports. Specifically, the bill requires federal judicial officers to file reports within 45 days after a purchase, sale, or exchange that exceeds $1,000 in stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of securities. Additionally, the bill directs the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to establish a searchable internet database of judicial financial disclosure reports. The office must, within 90 days of the date by which a report must be filed, make the report available on the database in a searchable, sortable, and downloadable format. The bill does not require the immediate and unconditional availability of reports filed by a judicial officer or employee if the Judicial Conference finds that revealing personal and sensitive formation could endanger that individual or a family member of that individual.
- Who sponsors HR 5720?
- HR 5720 is sponsored by Issa, Darrell (Republican), Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" (Democratic), Nadler, Jerrold (Democratic), Roy, Chip (Republican), Jackson Lee, Sheila (Democratic), Norman, Ralph (Republican), Garcia, Sylvia R. (Democratic), and Ross, Deborah K. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HR 5720?
- This bill died with 117th Congress. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 5720?
- Track HR 5720 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 5720
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 5720
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →