North Carolina 2023-2024 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 7 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 632 — I-95 Toll Prohibition.

Last action — Passed 1st Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023-2024 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

11 added · 12 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 632 adds clarity by adjusting the formatting in sections discussing the Authority's ability to collect tolls on interstate highways. The changes refine the language but do not alter the overall intent of the bill. This matters because clear language helps ensure that those affected by the tolls understand the provisions, making the legislation more transparent and easier to follow.

→
Previous
Latest
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Apr 5, 2023 S.B.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2023 S 1 SENATE BILL 632 Short Title:
632 SESSION 2023 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS35214-MW-21 Short Title:
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE IMPOSITION OF TOLLS ON INTERSTATE 95 FOR TEN YEARS AND TO REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR TOLLING INTERSTATE 95 THEREAFTER.
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 6, 2023 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE IMPOSITION OF TOLLS ON INTERSTATE 95 FOR TEN YEARS AND TO REQUIRE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR TOLLING INTERSTATE 95 THEREAFTER.
–Notwithstandinganyotherprovision of this Article, andwith the exception set forth in subsection (d) of this section, the Authority may collect tolls on any existing interstate highway for which the United States Department of Transportation has granted permission by permit, or any other lawful means, to do so.
–Notwithstandinganyotherprovision of this Article, andwith the exception set forth in subsection (d) of this section, the Authoritymaycollect tolls on anyexisting interstate highway for which the United States Department of Transportation has granted permission by permit, or any other lawful means, to do so.
–Notwithstandinganyotherprovision of this Article,andwith the exception set forth in subsection (d) of this section, the Authority may collect tolls on any existing interstate highway for which the United States Department of Transportation has granted permission by permit, or any other lawful means, to do so.
–Notwithstandinganyotherprovision of this Article,and with the exception set forth in subsection (d) of this section, the Authoritymaycollect tolls on anyexisting interstate highway for which the United States Department of Transportation has granted permission by permit, or any other lawful means, to do so.
Toll locations shall be erected at or near the *DRS35214-MW-21* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2023 borders of the State and at such other locations that are not impracticable, unfeasible, or that would result in an unsafe or hazardous condition.
Toll locations shall be erected at or near the *S632-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2023 borders of the State and at such other locations that are not impracticable, unfeasible, or that would result in an unsafe or hazardous condition.
Page 2 DRS35214-MW-21
Page 2 Senate Bill 632-First Edition
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Passed 1st Reading

  2. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  3. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (171)

171 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 171 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 632?
SB 632 is sponsored by Paul Newton (Republican), Benton G. Sawrey (Republican), Danny Earl Britt, Jr. (Republican), Lisa S. Barnes (Republican), Jim Burgin (Republican), Bobby Hanig (Republican), Mujtaba A. Mohammed (Democratic), and Norman W. Sanderson (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 632?
This bill died with 2023-2024 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 632?
Track SB 632 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 632

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 632

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →