North Carolina 2021-2022 Session Status: Passed House 9 R cosponsors

HB 291 — Commercial Prop. Plan Review.

Last action — Withdrawn From Com

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

The bill establishes time limits for local governments to review and approve commercial and multifamily building plans.

This bill requires local governments in North Carolina to complete initial reviews of commercial and multifamily building plans within 21 days and allows for expedited review using third-party architects or engineers. It also stipulates that fees must be refunded if the local government fails to meet these deadlines.

What this means for you
  • Small Business: This means faster approvals for your building projects, reducing delays and costs.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

87 added · 118 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill HB 291 removed references to "multifamily building plans," focusing solely on "commercial building plans." This change simplifies the bill's application and streamlines the approval process for local governments when it comes to reviewing designs submitted by licensed architects and engineers. This matters because it can potentially speed up construction projects and reduce administrative burdens for local governments.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 2 HOUSE BILL 291 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/22/21 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 1 HOUSE BILL 291 Short Title:
Representatives Zenger, Potts, and Johnson (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
March 15, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ESTABLISH AND REQUIRE CERTAIN TIME LINES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY BUILDING PLANS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH REMEDIES FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY REVIEW PLANS SUBMITTED UNDER THE EXPERTISE OF A LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.
Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Local Government - Land Use, Planning and Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House March 15, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ESTABLISH AND REQUIRE CERTAIN TIME LINES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING PLANS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND TO ESTABLISH REMEDIES FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY REVIEW PLANS SUBMITTED UNDER THE EXPERTISE OF A LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.
d.
*H291-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 d.
*H291-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 e.
e.
(b) Upon the acceptance and approval receipt of a signed written document by the local government as required under subsection (a) of this section, or upon issuance of a permit under subsection (c1) of this section, notwithstanding the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the local government, its inspection department, and the inspectors are discharged and released from any liabilities, duties, and responsibilities imposed by this Article with respect to or in common law from any claim arising out of or attributed to the component or element in the construction of the building for which the signed written document was submitted.submitted or permit was issued.
(b) Upon the acceptance and approval receipt of a signed written document by the local government as required under subsection (a) or (c1) of this section, notwithstanding the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the local government, its inspection department, and the inspectors are discharged and released from any liabilities, duties, and responsibilities imposed by this Article with respect to or in common law from any claim arising out of or attributed to the component or element in the construction of the building for which the signed written document was submitted.
(c1) Notwithstandinganyprovisionoflawtothecontrary,forcommercial andmultifamily building plans submitted that require a design professional seal pursuant to Building Code Council rules, initial plan review shall be completed and a building permit decision issued within 21 days.
(c1) Notwithstandinganyprovisionoflawto thecontrary, for commercialplans submitted that require a design professional seal pursuant to Building Code Council rules, initial plan review shall be completed within 15 days.
During the initial 21-day period, the local government or its agents shall communicate with the design professional to resolve questions and issues with the submitted plan.
During the initial 15-dayperiod, the local government or its agents shall communicate with the design professional to resolve questions and issues with the submitted plan.
If the local government requests additional information or requires that the plan be resubmitted with changes, the local government shall review the requested information or resubmitted plan and issue a building permit decision within 15 days from the receipt of the requested information or resubmitted plan.
If the local government requests additional information or requires that the plan be resubmitted with changes, the local government shall review the requested information or resubmitted plan and issue a permit within 15 days from the receipt of the requested information or resubmitted plan.
(c2) In the event the local government determines that it is unable to complete the initial plan review within 21 days, the local government may utilize the Department of Insurance and its marketplace pool of qualified Code-enforcement officials or contract with a third-party engineering firm that possesses a valid certificate under G.S.
In the event that the local government does not issue a permit for the submitted plan within 30 days of initial plan submission, or, if additional information or plan resubmission is requested, within 15 days of the receipt of the information or resubmitted plan, the following shall apply:
143-151.13 to perform the initial plan review provided that the total time for the initial plan review does not exceed the 21 days required under subsection (c1) of this section.
(c3) The following shall apply (i) if the local government does not issue a building permit decisionforthesubmittedplanwithin21daysofinitialplansubmissionasprovidedinsubsection (c1) of this section or (ii) when additional information or a plan resubmission is requested and the local government does not issue a building permit decision within 15 days of the receipt of the additional information or resubmitted plan as provided in subsection (c1) of this section:
(2) The permit applicant may utilize the Department of Insurance and its marketplace pool of qualified Code-enforcement officials or hire a third-party engineering firm that possesses a valid certificate under G.S.
(2) The permit applicant may retain a third-party firm to review the submitted plans, and the cost of the third-party review shall be reimbursed by the local government.
143-151.13 to review and approve the submitted plans.
Upon review and approval by the third party, the local government shall issue all necessary permits for the project within 72 hours.
The cost of the third-party review performed by the Department of Insurance or a third-party engineering firm shall be reimbursed by the local government.
In the event the local government or its agents require specifications or manufacturer engineering information on an element, component, or fixture related to the submitted plan, the local government shall obtain that information from the manufacturerofthe element,component, or fixture.
Upon review and approval by the third party, the local government shall issue all necessary building permits for the project within 72 hours.
(c4) In the event the local government or its agents require specifications or manufacturer engineering information on an element, component, or fixture related to the submitted plan, the local government shall obtain that information from the manufacturerofthe element,component, Page 2 House Bill 291-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 or fixture.
(c5) In the event that a local government's ordinance conflicts with anypart of this section, the provisions of this section shall supersede and preempt any ordinance adopted or imposed by the local government.
The term does not include a system." SECTION 2.
The term does not include a system." Page 2 House Bill 291-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 2.
G.S.
143-151.12(9) reads as rewritten:
"(9) Establish within the Department of Insurance a marketplace pool of qualified Code-enforcement officials available for the following purposes:
a.
When requested by the Insurance Commissioner, to assist in the discharge of the Commissioner's duty under G.S.
143-139 to supervise, administer, and enforce the North Carolina State Building Code.
… c.
When requested by a building permit applicant under G.S.
160D-1106(c3)(2)." SECTION 3.
G.S.
143-151.13 is amended by adding a new subsection to read:
"(g) An engineer who possesses a valid certificate under subsection (f) of this section, but is not employed by the State or a local government, may utilize that certificate for the limited purpose of performing initial plan reviews as permitted under G.S.
160D-1106(c2) and (c3)." SECTION 4.
House Bill 291-Second Edition Page 3
House Bill 291-First Edition Page 3
View plain text versions (5)

How this bill changes current law

2 changes Share ↗

Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill establishes new requirements and processes for the review and approval of commercial and multifamily building plans, facilitating faster approvals and the use of third-party reviewers.

  • G.S. 143-151.13

    (g) An architect or engineer who possesses a valid certificate under subsection (f) of this section, but is not employed by the State or a local government, may utilize that certificate for the limited purpose of performing initial plan reviews as permitted under G.S. 160D-1104.2(b) and (c).

    This provision allows certified architects or engineers to conduct initial plan reviews for specific buildings, thereby broadening the scope of those eligible to perform such reviews.

  • G.S. 143-151.12(9)

    (9) Establish within the Department of Insurance a marketplace pool of qualified Code-enforcement officials available for the following purposes: a. When requested by the Insurance Commissioner, to assist in the discharge of the Commissioner's duty under G.S. 143-139 to supervise, administer, and enforce the North Carolina State Building Code. → (9) Establish within the Department of Insurance a marketplace pool of qualified Code-enforcement officials available for the following purposes: a. When requested by the Insurance Commissioner, to assist in the discharge of the Commissioner's duty under G.S. 143-139 to supervise, administer, and enforce the North Carolina State Building Code. c. When requested under G.S. 160D-1104.2.

    This change adds a new purpose to the marketplace pool of Code-enforcement officials, allowing them to assist with the newly established plan review procedures.

Action History

  1. Withdrawn From Com

  2. Re-ref to Judiciary. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  3. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  4. Com Substitute Adopted

  5. Re-ref Com On State and Local Government

  6. Withdrawn From Com

  7. Re-ref to Commerce and Insurance. If fav, re-ref to State and Local Government. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate

  8. Regular Message Sent To Senate

  9. Regular Message Received From House

  10. Passed 1st Reading

  11. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  12. Passed 2nd Reading

  13. Passed 3rd Reading

  14. Reptd Fav Com Sub 2

  15. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  16. Reptd Fav

  17. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  18. Placed On Cal For 05/10/2021

  19. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  20. Re-ref Com On Local Government - Land Use, Planning and Development

  21. Passed 1st Reading

  22. Ref to the Com on Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Local Government - Land Use, Planning and Development, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  23. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 168 not signed on · 22 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (168)

168 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 168 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 79 Yea · 33 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 71901
Unaffiliated 301302
Republican 42004
U 0101
Total 793308
% of votes cast 66%28%0%7%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Clemmons — Yea
Farkas — Yea
Graham — Yea
Harris — Yea
Hunter — Yea
Hurtado — Yea
Lucas — Yea
Richardson — Yea
Wray — Yea
Boles — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Bumgardner — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cleveland — Yea
Davis — Yea
Elmore — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Johnson — Yea
McElraft — Yea
McNeill — Yea
Mills — Yea
Moore — Yea
Rogers — Yea
Saine — Yea
Sasser — Yea
Szoka — Yea
Yarborough — Yea
Autry — Nay
Cooper-Suggs — Nay
Fisher — Nay
Gailliard — Nay
Garrison — Nay
Gill — Nay
Hunt — Nay
Insko — Nay
Martin — Nay
Terry — Nay
vonHaefen — Nay
Hardister — Not Voting
Zachary — Not Voting
C. Smith — Yea
K. Baker — Yea
K. Smith — Nay
R. Smith — Nay
Abe Jones Democratic Yea
Allison A. Dahle Democratic Nay
Amber M. Baker Democratic Nay
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Nay
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Brandon Lofton Democratic Nay
Brian Turner Democratic Yea
Carolyn G. Logan Democratic Nay
Cecil Brockman Democratic Nay
Cynthia Ball Democratic Nay
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Nay
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Gale Adcock Democratic Nay
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Nay
Graig Meyer Democratic Nay
James Roberson Democratic Nay
Joe John Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Nay
Mary Belk Democratic Not Voting
Pricey Harrison Democratic Nay
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Nay
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Terence Everitt Democratic Nay
Terry M. Brown Jr. Democratic Nay
Vernetta Alston Democratic Nay
Zack Hawkins Democratic Nay
Ben T. Moss, Jr. Republican Yea
Bobby Hanig Republican Yea
Brenden H. Jones Republican Yea
Charles W. Miller Republican Yea
Chris Humphrey Republican Not Voting
David Willis Republican Yea
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Destin Hall Republican Yea
Diane Wheatley Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Yea
Dudley Greene Republican Yea
Edward C. Goodwin Republican Yea
Erin Paré Republican Yea
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Howard Penny, Jr. Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Yea
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jeff Zenger Republican Yea
Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John R. Bell, IV Republican Not Voting
John Sauls Republican Yea
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Karl E. Gillespie Republican Yea
Keith Kidwell Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kyle Hall Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mark Pless Republican Yea
Matthew Winslow Republican Yea
Mike Clampitt Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Ray Pickett Republican Yea
Sam Watford Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Yea
Steve Tyson Republican Not Voting
Timothy D. Moffitt Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Not Voting
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Not Voting
Nasif Majeed U Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 291?
HB 291 is sponsored by Jeff Zenger (Republican), Larry W. Potts (Republican), Mark Brody (Republican), Carter, Kyle Hall (Republican), Kelly E. Hastings (Republican), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Donna McDowell White (Republican), Matthew Winslow (Republican), Zachary, and Jake Johnson (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 291?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 291?
Track HB 291 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 291

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 291

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →