Supporting Law Enforcement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 565 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 565.
You're tracking SB 565
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 565 — Supporting Law Enforcement.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 15 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Senate Bill 565 adds a line stating that the bill will allocate $250,000 in recurring funds each year. This funding is important as it ensures that the resources are available on a continuous basis, which can help support the programs or initiatives initially outlined in the bill. The amendment also appears to streamline the language without changing the core content, which can help clarify the bill's intentions. Overall, these adjustments aim to improve the bill's effectiveness and funding sustainability.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA AprSESSION 6, 2021 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 565 Short Title:
565 SESSION 2021 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS45305-NDa-89A Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 7, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN POLICIES AND STANDARDS SURROUNDING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of two hundred fiftyfiftythousand thousand dollars ($250,000) in recurring funds for each year of the 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to award grants to law enforcement agencies for initiatives supporting community policing.
*DRS45305-NDa-89A**S565-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 3.2.
Nothing in this subdivision constitutes justification for willful, malicious or criminally negligent conduct by any person which injures or endangers any Page 2 DRS45305-NDa-89ASenate Bill 565-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 person or property, nor shall it be construed to excuse or justify the use of unreasonable or excessive force.
Information collected under this section that is confidential under State or federal law shall remain confidential." DRS45305-NDa-89ASenate Bill 565-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 5.2.(e) Subpart C of Part 4 of Article 13 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
The standards for entry level employment shall include a psychological screening Page 4 DRS45305-NDa-89ASenate Bill 565-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 within one year prior to certification performed by a physician, psychologist, or other mental health professional.
(2b) Establish minimum mental health screening protocols that must be met in order to qualify for entry level employment and retention as an officer in temporarytemporaryor orprobationarystatus probationary status or in a permanent position.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in recurring funds for each year of the DRS45305-NDa-89ASenate Bill 565-First Edition Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to provide grants to law enforcement agencies to pay for the mental health screenings required by Sections 6.1 and 6.3 of this Part.
Page 6 DRS45305-NDa-89ASenate Bill 565-First Edition
Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing law regarding the use of force by law enforcement officers and establishes new requirements for maintaining databases of law enforcement officer certifications and critical incident data.
-
G.S. 15A-401(d)
(d) Use of Force in Arrest. – (1) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (2), a law-enforcement officer is justified in using force upon another person when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary: a. To prevent the escape from custody or to effect an arrest of a person who he reasonably believes has committed a criminal offense, unless he knows that the arrest is unauthorized; or b. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force while effecting or attempting to effect an arrest or while preventing or attempting to prevent an escape. (2) A law-enforcement officer is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person for a purpose specified in subdivision (1) of this subsection only when it is or appears to be reasonably necessary thereby: a. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force; b. To effect an arrest or to prevent the escape from custody of a person who he reasonably believes is attempting to escape by means of a deadly weapon, or who by his conduct or any other means indicates that he presents an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to others unless apprehended without delay; or c. To prevent the escape of a person from custody imposed upon him as a result of conviction for a felony. Nothing in this subdivision constitutes justification for willful, malicious or criminally negligent conduct by any person which injures or endangers any person or property, nor shall it be construed to excuse or justify the use of unreasonable or excessive force. (3) Strangleholds, lateral vascular neck restraints, carotid restraints, or any other tactics that restrict oxygen or blood flow to the head or neck shall be considered the use of deadly force under this subdivision. (4) A law-enforcement officer that witnesses another law-enforcement officer using excessive force not justified under this section or otherwise abusing a suspect or arrestee has a duty to intervene and to report the use of excessive force or the abuse. (5) Under all circumstances in which a law-enforcement officer uses force of any kind, a law-enforcement officer shall use the minimum amount of force reasonably necessary to accomplish the law-enforcement action and shall attempt to utilize de-escalation tactics when possible.
This section establishes more stringent criteria for the use of deadly force and mandates a duty to intervene against excessive force.
-
§ 114-2.8. Database for law enforcement officer critical incident information. (a) The Department of Justice, in consultation with the Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission and the Sheriffs' Education and Training Standards Commission, shall develop and maintain a statewide database for use by law enforcement agencies that tracks all critical incident data of law enforcement officers in North Carolina. For purposes of this section, 'critical incident' shall be defined as an incident involving any use of force by a law enforcement officer that results in death or serious bodily injury to a person. (b) All law enforcement agencies in the State, including, but not limited to, the State Highway Patrol, the State Bureau of Investigation, county sheriffs' offices, municipal police departments, campus police agencies, and company police agencies, shall provide to the Department of Justice information requested to maintain the database required by subsection (a) of this section. (c) Information collected under this section that is confidential under State or federal law shall remain confidential.
This new section establishes a database for tracking critical incidents involving law enforcement officers, enhancing accountability.
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brent Jackson · Cosponsor
- Sydney Batch · Primary
- Crawford · Primary
- Michael Garrett · Cosponsor
- deViere · Cosponsor
- Foushee · Cosponsor
- Jr. Paul A. Lowe · Cosponsor
- Marcus · Cosponsor
- Gladys A. Robinson · Cosponsor
- DeAndrea Salvador · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 169 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Sydney Batch Democratic
- Crawford
Co-sponsors (8)
- Brent Jackson Republican
- Michael Garrett Democratic
- deViere
- Foushee
- Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic
- Marcus
- Gladys A. Robinson Democratic
- DeAndrea Salvador Democratic
Not signed on (169)
169 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 169 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 46 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bode | — | Yea |
| Hunt | — | Yea |
| Woodard | — | Yea |
| Krawiec | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Proctor | — | Yea |
| Marcus | — | Not Voting |
| P. Newton | — | Yea |
| Dan Blue | Democratic | Yea |
| DeAndrea Salvador | Democratic | Yea |
| Gale Adcock | Democratic | Yea |
| Gladys A. Robinson | Democratic | Yea |
| Graig Meyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay J. Chaudhuri | Democratic | Yea |
| Joyce Waddell | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Mayfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Kandie D. Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa Grafstein | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Michael Garrett | Democratic | Yea |
| Mujtaba A. Mohammed | Democratic | Yea |
| Natalie S. Murdock | Democratic | Yea |
| Paul A. Lowe, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Sydney Batch | Democratic | Yea |
| Val Applewhite | Democratic | Yea |
| Amy S. Galey | Republican | Yea |
| Benton G. Sawrey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bill Rabon | Republican | Yea |
| Bobby Hanig | Republican | Yea |
| Brad Overcash | Republican | Yea |
| Brent Jackson | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Ford | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Earl Britt, Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| David W. Craven, Jr. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Eddie D. Settle | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Burgin | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Corbin | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa S. Barnes | Republican | Yea |
| Michael A. Lazzara | Republican | Yea |
| Michael V. Lee | Republican | Yea |
| Norman W. Sanderson | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Newton | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Berger | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Hise | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Jarvis | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy D. Moffitt | Republican | Yea |
| Tom McInnis | Republican | Yea |
| Vickie Sawyer | Republican | Yea |
| W. Ted Alexander | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Daniel | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 565?
- SB 565 is sponsored by Brent Jackson (Republican), Sydney Batch (Democratic), Crawford, Michael Garrett (Democratic), deViere, Foushee, Paul A. Lowe, Jr. (Democratic), Marcus, Gladys A. Robinson (Democratic), and DeAndrea Salvador (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 565?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 565?
- Track SB 565 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 565
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 565
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →