North Carolina 2021-2022 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 5 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 565 — Supporting Law Enforcement.

Last action — Passed 1st Reading

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

14 added · 15 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Senate Bill 565 adds a line stating that the bill will allocate $250,000 in recurring funds each year. This funding is important as it ensures that the resources are available on a continuous basis, which can help support the programs or initiatives initially outlined in the bill. The amendment also appears to streamline the language without changing the core content, which can help clarify the bill's intentions. Overall, these adjustments aim to improve the bill's effectiveness and funding sustainability.

→
Previous
Latest
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Apr 6, 2021 S.B.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 S 1 SENATE BILL 565 Short Title:
565 SESSION 2021 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS45305-NDa-89A Short Title:
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN POLICIES AND STANDARDS SURROUNDING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 7, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN POLICIES AND STANDARDS SURROUNDING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in recurring funds for each year of the 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to award grants to law enforcement agencies for initiatives supporting community policing.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of two hundred fiftythousand dollars ($250,000) in recurring funds for each year of the 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to award grants to law enforcement agencies for initiatives supporting community policing.
*DRS45305-NDa-89A* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 3.2.
*S565-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 3.2.
Nothing in this subdivision constitutes justification for willful, malicious or criminally negligent conduct by any person which injures or endangers any Page 2 DRS45305-NDa-89A General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 person or property, nor shall it be construed to excuse or justify the use of unreasonable or excessive force.
Nothing in this subdivision constitutes justification for willful, malicious or criminally negligent conduct by any person which injures or endangers any Page 2 Senate Bill 565-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 person or property, nor shall it be construed to excuse or justify the use of unreasonable or excessive force.
Information collected under this section that is confidential under State or federal law shall remain confidential." DRS45305-NDa-89A Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 5.2.(e) Subpart C of Part 4 of Article 13 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
Information collected under this section that is confidential under State or federal law shall remain confidential." Senate Bill 565-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 SECTION 5.2.(e) Subpart C of Part 4 of Article 13 of Chapter 143B of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
The standards for entry level employment shall include a psychological screening Page 4 DRS45305-NDa-89A General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 within one year prior to certification performed by a physician, psychologist, or other mental health professional.
The standards for entry level employment shall include a psychological screening Page 4 Senate Bill 565-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 within one year prior to certification performed by a physician, psychologist, or other mental health professional.
(2b) Establish minimum mental health screening protocols that must be met in order to qualify for entry level employment and retention as an officer in temporary or probationary status or in a permanent position.
(2b) Establish minimum mental health screening protocols that must be met in order to qualify for entry level employment and retention as an officer in temporaryor probationarystatus or in a permanent position.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in recurring funds for each year of the DRS45305-NDa-89A Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to provide grants to law enforcement agencies to pay for the mental health screenings required by Sections 6.1 and 6.3 of this Part.
There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of Justice the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in recurring funds for each year of the Senate Bill 565-First Edition Page 5 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 2021-2023 fiscal biennium to be used to provide grants to law enforcement agencies to pay for the mental health screenings required by Sections 6.1 and 6.3 of this Part.
Page 6 DRS45305-NDa-89A
Page 6 Senate Bill 565-First Edition
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

2 changes Share ↗

Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill amends existing law regarding the use of force by law enforcement officers and establishes new requirements for maintaining databases of law enforcement officer certifications and critical incident data.

  • G.S. 15A-401(d)

    (d) Use of Force in Arrest. – (1) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (2), a law-enforcement officer is justified in using force upon another person when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary: a. To prevent the escape from custody or to effect an arrest of a person who he reasonably believes has committed a criminal offense, unless he knows that the arrest is unauthorized; or b. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of physical force while effecting or attempting to effect an arrest or while preventing or attempting to prevent an escape. (2) A law-enforcement officer is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person for a purpose specified in subdivision (1) of this subsection only when it is or appears to be reasonably necessary thereby: a. To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force; b. To effect an arrest or to prevent the escape from custody of a person who he reasonably believes is attempting to escape by means of a deadly weapon, or who by his conduct or any other means indicates that he presents an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to others unless apprehended without delay; or c. To prevent the escape of a person from custody imposed upon him as a result of conviction for a felony. Nothing in this subdivision constitutes justification for willful, malicious or criminally negligent conduct by any person which injures or endangers any person or property, nor shall it be construed to excuse or justify the use of unreasonable or excessive force. (3) Strangleholds, lateral vascular neck restraints, carotid restraints, or any other tactics that restrict oxygen or blood flow to the head or neck shall be considered the use of deadly force under this subdivision. (4) A law-enforcement officer that witnesses another law-enforcement officer using excessive force not justified under this section or otherwise abusing a suspect or arrestee has a duty to intervene and to report the use of excessive force or the abuse. (5) Under all circumstances in which a law-enforcement officer uses force of any kind, a law-enforcement officer shall use the minimum amount of force reasonably necessary to accomplish the law-enforcement action and shall attempt to utilize de-escalation tactics when possible.

    This section establishes more stringent criteria for the use of deadly force and mandates a duty to intervene against excessive force.

  • § 114-2.8. Database for law enforcement officer critical incident information. (a) The Department of Justice, in consultation with the Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission and the Sheriffs' Education and Training Standards Commission, shall develop and maintain a statewide database for use by law enforcement agencies that tracks all critical incident data of law enforcement officers in North Carolina. For purposes of this section, 'critical incident' shall be defined as an incident involving any use of force by a law enforcement officer that results in death or serious bodily injury to a person. (b) All law enforcement agencies in the State, including, but not limited to, the State Highway Patrol, the State Bureau of Investigation, county sheriffs' offices, municipal police departments, campus police agencies, and company police agencies, shall provide to the Department of Justice information requested to maintain the database required by subsection (a) of this section. (c) Information collected under this section that is confidential under State or federal law shall remain confidential.

    This new section establishes a database for tracking critical incidents involving law enforcement officers, enhancing accountability.

Action History

  1. Passed 1st Reading

  2. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  3. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 169 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (169)

169 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 169 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 15001
Unaffiliated 7001
Republican 24002
Total 46004
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
Bode — Yea
Hunt — Yea
Woodard — Yea
Krawiec — Yea
Perry — Yea
Proctor — Yea
Marcus — Not Voting
P. Newton — Yea
Dan Blue Democratic Yea
DeAndrea Salvador Democratic Yea
Gale Adcock Democratic Yea
Gladys A. Robinson Democratic Yea
Graig Meyer Democratic Yea
Jay J. Chaudhuri Democratic Yea
Joyce Waddell Democratic Yea
Julie Mayfield Democratic Yea
Kandie D. Smith Democratic Yea
Lisa Grafstein Democratic Not Voting
Michael Garrett Democratic Yea
Mujtaba A. Mohammed Democratic Yea
Natalie S. Murdock Democratic Yea
Paul A. Lowe, Jr. Democratic Yea
Sydney Batch Democratic Yea
Val Applewhite Democratic Yea
Amy S. Galey Republican Yea
Benton G. Sawrey Republican Not Voting
Bill Rabon Republican Yea
Bobby Hanig Republican Yea
Brad Overcash Republican Yea
Brent Jackson Republican Yea
Carl Ford Republican Yea
Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican Yea
David W. Craven, Jr. Republican Not Voting
Eddie D. Settle Republican Yea
Jake Johnson Republican Yea
Jim Burgin Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Lisa S. Barnes Republican Yea
Michael A. Lazzara Republican Yea
Michael V. Lee Republican Yea
Norman W. Sanderson Republican Yea
Paul Newton Republican Yea
Phil Berger Republican Yea
Ralph Hise Republican Yea
Steve Jarvis Republican Yea
Timothy D. Moffitt Republican Yea
Tom McInnis Republican Yea
Vickie Sawyer Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
Warren Daniel Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 565?
SB 565 is sponsored by Brent Jackson (Republican), Sydney Batch (Democratic), Crawford, Michael Garrett (Democratic), deViere, Foushee, Paul A. Lowe, Jr. (Democratic), Marcus, Gladys A. Robinson (Democratic), and DeAndrea Salvador (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 565?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 565?
Track SB 565 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 565

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 565

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →