HB 494 — Digital Interference Censorship Act.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
16 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of House Bill 494 adds new language clarifying the requirements for identifying a resident of North Carolina, specifically mentioning their billing address. Additionally, it establishes that people can take legal action only if the Attorney General does not address their complaint. This change is important because it provides clearer guidelines on who is considered a resident for legal protections and sets a framework for individuals to seek remedies if their concerns are ignored.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA H.B.SESSION 2021 H 1 HOUSE BILL 494 Short Title:
494 Apr 5, 2021 SESSION 2021 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE BILL DRH40307-MQ-129 Short Title:
RepresentativeRepresentatives McNeely.McNeely, Johnson, Kidwell, and Tyson (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Commerce, if favorable, Judiciary3,if favorable, Rules,Calendar, andOperations of the House April 12, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENACT THE NORTH CAROLINA DIGITAL INTERFERENCE CENSORSHIP ACT.
Chapter 75 of the General Statutes is amended bybyadding adding a new Article to read:
The term includes a digital application platform provided or used onlyonlyfor for a certain type of device, including a certain grade of computing device, a device made only by a particular manufacturer, or a device running a particular operating system.
*DRH40307-MQ-129**H494-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 (6) Provider.
– A person whose last known billing address, otherthanother than an Armed Forces post office or fleet post office address, is located within this State, as shown in the records of a provider of a digital application distribution platform.
(b) In an action in Superior Court brought pursuant to this Article, the court may award a prevailing plaintiff reasonable attorneys' fees if the court finds the defendant willfully engaged in the act or practice in violation of this Article, and the court may award reasonable attorneys' Page 2 DRH40307-MQ-129House Bill 494-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 fees to a prevailing defendant if the court finds that the plaintiff knew, or should have known, that the action was frivolous and malicious.
(f) A private right of action is created under this Article onlyonlyif if the AttorneyAttorneyGeneral General fails to enforce this Article as provided by G.S.
DRH40307-MQ-129House Bill 494-First Edition Page 3
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Commerce, if favorable, Judiciary 3, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Jeffrey C. McNeely · Primary
- Keith Kidwell · Primary
- Steve Tyson · Cosponsor
- Cleveland · Cosponsor
- Phil Shepard · Cosponsor
- Dante Pittman · Cosponsor
- Mike Clampitt · Cosponsor
- Jake Johnson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican
- Keith Kidwell Republican
- Jake Johnson Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Steve Tyson Republican
- Cleveland
- Phil Shepard Republican
- Dante Pittman Democratic
- Mike Clampitt Republican
Not signed on (171)
171 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 171 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 494?
- HB 494 is sponsored by Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Keith Kidwell (Republican), Steve Tyson (Republican), Cleveland, Phil Shepard (Republican), Dante Pittman (Democratic), Mike Clampitt (Republican), and Jake Johnson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 494?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 494?
- Track HB 494 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 494
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 494
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →