North Carolina 2021-2022 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 31 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 358 — Save Women's Sports Act.

Last action — Serial Referral To Education - Universities Stricken

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

70 added · 68 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of House Bill 358, some references and discussions surrounding the physiological differences between men and women in athletics have been added. These changes emphasize the inherent advantages of males in competitive sports and cite legal precedents supporting these views. This matters because it reinforces the argument for maintaining separate sex classifications in athletics, potentially influencing how sports are organized and the eligibility of athletes.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA H.B.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 1 HOUSE BILL 358 Short Title:
358 Mar 22, 2021 SESSION 2021 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE BILL DRH10141-MK-55A Short Title:
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENACT THE SAVE WOMEN'S SPORTS ACT TO PROTECT THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS IN ATHLETICS BY ENSURING WOMENARENOTFORCEDTOCOMPETEAGAINSTMENPLAYINGONWOMEN'S SPORTS TEAMS.
Judiciary 1, if favorable, Education - Universities, if favorable, Education - K-12, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House March 23, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ENACT THE SAVE WOMEN'S SPORTS ACT TO PROTECT THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS IN ATHLETICS BY ENSURING WOMENARENOTFORCEDTOCOMPETEAGAINSTMENPLAYINGONWOMEN'S SPORTS TEAMS.
Whereas, there are""[i]nherent differences" betweenmenand women," and thatthese differences "remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual's opportunity." United States v.
Whereas, there are ""[i]nherent differences"betweenmenand women," and thatthese differences "remain cause for celebration, but not for denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual's opportunity." United States v.
and Whereas, the biological differences between females and males, especially as they relateto natural levels of testosterone, "explain the maleand femalesecondarysex characteristics which develop during puberty and have lifelong effects, including those most important for success in sport:
and Whereas, the biological differences between females and males, especially as they relateto natural levels of testosterone, "explainthe maleand femalesecondarysex characteristics which develop during puberty and have lifelong effects, including those most important for success in sport:
and Whereas, one place where sex classifications allow for the "full development of the talent and capacities of our Nation's people" is in the context of sports and athletics;
and *H358-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 Whereas, one place where sex classifications allow for the "full development of the talent and capacities of our Nation's people" is in the context of sports and athletics;
and *DRH10141-MK-55A* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 Whereas, courts have recognized that the inherent, physiological differences between males and females result in different athletic capabilities.
and Whereas, courts have recognized that the inherent, physiological differences between males and females result in different athletic capabilities.
1979) (noting that "high school boys [generally possess physiological advantages over] their girl counterparts" and that those advantages give them an unfair lead over girls in some sports like "high school track");
1979) (noting that "high school boys [generallypossess physiological advantages over] their girl counterparts" and that those advantages give them an unfair lead over girls in some sports like "high school track");
Claims to the contrary are simply a denialofscience."DorianeColeman,Martina Navratilova,etal.,PasstheEqualityAct,ButDon't Abandon Title IX, WASHINGTON POST, (Apr.
Claims to the contrary are simply a denialofscience."DorianeColeman,MartinaNavratilova,etal.,PasstheEqualityAct,ButDon't Abandon Title IX, WASHINGTON POST, (Apr.
"[T]he reduction in testosterone levels required by many sports federation transgender policies is insufficient to remove or reduce the male advantage by any meaningful degree." For example, "the muscle mass advantage males possess over females, and potentially the performance implications thereof, are not removed by 12 months of testosterone suppression." Instead, the study concluded that "The data presented here demonstrates that the male physical performance advantage over females, attributed to superior anthropometric and muscle mass/strength parameters achieved at puberty, is not removed by the current regimen of testosterone suppression permitting participation of transgender women in female sports categories.
"[T]he reduction in testosterone levels required bymanysports federation transgender policies is insufficient to remove or reduce the male advantage by any meaningful degree." For example, "the muscle mass advantage males possess over females, and potentially the performance implications thereof, are not removed by 12 months of testosterone suppression." Instead, the study concluded that "The data presented here demonstrates that the male physical performance advantage over females, attributed to superior anthropometric and muscle mass/strength parameters achieved at puberty, is not removed by the current regimen of testosterone suppression permitting participation of transgender women in female sports categories.
Sex-specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors;
Sex-specific teams accomplish this byproviding opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors;
Page 2 DRH10141-MK-55A General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 (a) All athletic teams for middle and secondary school students participating in interscholastic or intramural athletic activities conducted by a public school unit shall be expressly designated as one of the following based on biological sex:
Page 2 House Bill 358-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 (a) All athletic teams for middle and secondary school students participating in interscholastic or intramural athletic activities conducted by a public school unit shall be expressly designated as one of the following based on biological sex:
(a) A biological female student who is deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers or is likely to suffer from any direct or indirect harm as a result of a violation of this Article may assert that violation as a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
(a) A biological female student who is deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers or is likelyto suffer from anydirect or indirect harm as a result of a violation of this Article mayassert that violation as a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
– The State Board of Education shall adopt rules governing interscholastic athletic activities conducted by local boards of education, including eligibility for student participation.
– The State Board of Education shall adopt rules governing interscholastic athletic activities conducted bylocal boards of education, including eligibility for student participation.
DRH10141-MK-55A Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 Article 29E of this Chapter shall apply to any nonpublic school that is a member of a State-level association, including the North Carolina High School Athletic Association (NCHSAA), that governs participation in interscholastic athletic activities at the high school level." SECTION 4.
House Bill 358-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 Article 29E of this Chapter shall apply to any nonpublic school that is a member of a State-level association, including the North Carolina High School Athletic Association (NCHSAA), that governs participation in interscholastic athletic activities at the high school level." SECTION 4.
(a) A biological female student who is deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers or is likely to suffer from any direct or indirect harm as a result of a violation of this Article may assert that violation as a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
(a) A biological female student who is deprived of an athletic opportunity or suffers or is likelyto suffer from anydirect or indirect harm as a result of a violation of this Article mayassert that violation as a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
(c) Any institution of highereducation or its representatives or employees who suffer any direct or indirect harm for prohibiting a biological male student from participating on a female, Page 4 DRH10141-MK-55A General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 girls', or women's athletic team pursuant to the requirements of this Article shall have a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
(c) Anyinstitution of higher education or its representatives or employees who suffer any direct or indirect harm for prohibiting a biological male student from participating on a female, Page 4 House Bill 358-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 girls', or women's athletic team pursuant to the requirements of this Article shall have a cause of action for remedies provided for in subsection (d) of this section.
DRH10141-MK-55A Page 5
House Bill 358-First Edition Page 5
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Serial Referral To Education - Universities Stricken

  2. Serial Referral To Education - K-12 Stricken

  3. Withdrawn From Com

  4. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  5. Passed 1st Reading

  6. Ref to the Com on Judiciary 1, if favorable, Education - Universities, if favorable, Education - K-12, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  7. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 46 co-sponsors · 130 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (46)

Not signed on (130)

130 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 130 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 358?
HB 358 is sponsored by Mike Clampitt (Republican), C. Smith, Mark Brody (Republican), McElraft, Diane Wheatley (Republican), Jimmy Dixon (Republican), Jay Adams (Republican), Dean Arp (Republican), Hugh Blackwell (Republican), Boles, Bumgardner, Carter, Cleveland, Elmore, Faircloth, Karl E. Gillespie (Republican), Edward C. Goodwin (Republican), Kyle Hall (Republican), Hanig, Kelly E. Hastings (Republican), Julia C. Howard (Republican), Chris Humphrey (Republican), Hurley, Frank Iler (Republican), Keith Kidwell (Republican), Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), McNeill, Mills, Ray Pickett (Republican), Mark Pless (Republican), Larry W. Potts (Republican), Dennis Riddell (Republican), Rogers, Saine, Sasser, Mitchell S. Setzer (Republican), Phil Shepard (Republican), Larry C. Strickland (Republican), Steve Tyson (Republican), Harry Warren (Republican), Sam Watford (Republican), Donna McDowell White (Republican), David Willis (Republican), Yarborough, Zachary, Dante Pittman (Democratic), Ben T. Moss, Jr. (Republican), Jake Johnson (Republican), and Ted Davis, Jr. (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 358?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 358?
Track HB 358 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 358

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 358

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →