HB 182 — Increasing Meat Production and Capacity.
Last action — Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
99 added · 97 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 182 has expanded the types of financial assistance available to meat and seafood processing facilities by adding new grant options. Specifically, it introduces workforce development grants aimed at addressing production slowdowns due to workforce limitations, as well as planning grants for nonprofit organizations and educational institutions to conduct studies related to new processing facilities. These changes matter because they aim to enhance the supply chain resilience in the food industry, helping facilities adapt better to challenges like pandemics or natural disasters.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2021 H 21 HOUSE BILL 182 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/21/21 Short Title:
Representatives McNeely, Gillespie, Hanig, and Elmore (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Agriculture, if favorable, Marine Resources and Aqua Culture, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House March 1, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN THE MEAT AND SEAFOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES IN NORTH CAROLINA BY MAKING PERMANENT THE "INCREASING MEATSEAFOOD AND SEAFOODMEAT PRODUCTION AND CAPACITY" GRANT PROGRAM.
"Increasing Meat and Seafood Production and Capacity Grant Program.
The General Assembly further finds that financial assistance to these processors for physical expansion and facility improvements, for workforce development, and for the creation of additional processing capacity is necessary to reduce disruptions in the supply chain for fresh meat and seafood and to help small producers get their productsproduct to market.
A capacity enhancement grant may be used for expansion of an existing eligible facility and for fixtures or *H182-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 equipment at an existing eligible facility that will expand animal throughput, processing capacity, the amount or type of products *H182-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 produced,orprocessingspeed.A grantunderthissub-subdivisionmay not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
– Recipients shall provide matching funds for a grant under sub-subdivisionsub-subdivisions(1)a.,(1)b.,or(1)c.ofthissectionintheamountofonedollar (1)a.,($1.00) (1)b.,from ornongrant (1)c.sources for every two dollars ($2.00) provided by the grant.
of this section in the amount of one dollar ($1.00) from nongrant sources for every two dollars ($2.00) provided by the grant.
of this section in the amount of one dollar ($1.00) from nongrant sources for every one dollar ($1.00) provided by the grant.
With respect to new facility development grants, the Department shall require the recipient to keep the new meat or seafood processing Page 2 House Bill 182-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 facilityin service for a minimum term of five years.
If the facility does not remain in service for the required term, the Department shall Page 2 House Bill 182-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 recapture, at a minimum, the amount of the grant directly proportionate to the remainder of the minimum term that the recipient failed to keep the facility in service.
– The Department may adopt temporary and permanent rules to implement the IMSPAC grant program authorized by this Article." SECTION 2.(a) ItThe isState theController intentshall oftransfer the Generalsum Assemblyof to appropriate ten million dollars ($10,000,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2021-20222020-2021 fiscal year from the Coronavirus Relief Fund,Reserve toestablished be allocated to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for the purposes set forth in thisSection act2.1 thatof are compatible with COVID-19 Recovery Legislation, as that term is defined in S.L.
2020-4,2020-4. or with any subsequent federal legislation that provides COVID-19 relief funds to the State.
There is appropriated from the Coronavirus Relief Fund established by Section 2.2 of S.L.
2020-4 to the Office of State Budget and Management Services the sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) in nonrecurring funds for the 2020-2021 fiscal year, to be allocated to the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for the purposes set forth in this act that are compatible with COVID-19 Recovery Legislation, as that term is defined in S.L.
2020-4.
SECTION 2.(d) The provisions of G.S.
143C-5-2 do not apply to this act.
House Bill 182-Second182-First Edition Page 3
Action History
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Re-ref Com On Marine Resources and Aqua Culture
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Agriculture, if favorable, Marine Resources and Aqua Culture, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Jeffrey C. McNeely · Primary
- Karl E. Gillespie · Primary
- Hanig · Primary
- Elmore · Cosponsor
- William D. Brisson · Cosponsor
- Mark Brody · Cosponsor
- Carter · Cosponsor
- Keith Kidwell · Cosponsor
- Timothy D. Moffitt · Cosponsor
- Sasser · Cosponsor
- Donna McDowell White · Cosponsor
- Mike Clampitt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 167 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Jeffrey C. McNeely Republican
- Karl E. Gillespie Republican
- Hanig
Co-sponsors (9)
- Elmore
- William D. Brisson Republican
- Mark Brody Republican
- Carter
- Keith Kidwell Republican
- Timothy D. Moffitt Republican
- Sasser
- Donna McDowell White Republican
- Mike Clampitt Republican
Not signed on (167)
167 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 167 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 182?
- HB 182 is sponsored by Jeffrey C. McNeely (Republican), Karl E. Gillespie (Republican), Hanig, Elmore, William D. Brisson (Republican), Mark Brody (Republican), Carter, Keith Kidwell (Republican), Timothy D. Moffitt (Republican), Sasser, Donna McDowell White (Republican), and Mike Clampitt (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 182?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 182?
- Track HB 182 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 182
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 182
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →