SB 697 — Law Enforcement Officer Fairness Act.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 13 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 697 has added several lines that clarify the title of the bill as the "Municipal Law Enforcement Accountability" act. The amendment also makes minor changes regarding procedural rights related to questioning witnesses in cases involving law enforcement officers. These adjustments are important as they help ensure transparency and accountability in how police conduct is reviewed, emphasizing the rights of individuals during these processes.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA AprSESSION 7, 2021 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 697 Short Title:
697 SESSION 2021 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS45279-ND-121 Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 8, 2021 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO STANDARDIZE THE DISMISSAL OF MUNICIPAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
Thisactshallbeknownandmaybecitedasthe"MunicipalLawEnforcementAccountability,Thisactshallbeknownandmaybecitedasthe"Municipal LawEnforcementAccountability, Transparency, and Fairness Act." "§ 17F-2.
These procedures shall include, at a minimum, the right to a hearing *DRS45279-ND-121**S697-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2021 before a fair and impartial board or hearing officer, the right to be represented at the officer's expense, the right to question anyanywitnesses witnesses who give oral statements against the officer, the right to call witnesses and present evidence, and the right to have all meetings recorded for use at any supplemental adjudicatory hearing or court proceeding.
Any party wishing to receive a copy of the recording of a hearing proceeding required by this section shall be required to paypaythe the cost of copying the recording only.
A party wishingwishingto to receive transcripts shall be required to pay the cost of transcription.
EachmunicipalityEachmunicipalityemployinglawenforcementofficersshalladoptanordinancethatprovides employinglawenforcementofficersshalladoptanordinancethatprovides the minimum rights required by this Chapter.
Page 2 DRS45279-ND-121Senate Bill 697-First Edition
Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill creates a new chapter addressing the dismissal of municipal law enforcement officers, establishing just cause requirements and review processes.
-
N.C.G.S. § 17F-4
§ 17F-4. Just cause; disciplinary actions for local law enforcement officers. (a) Just Cause. – The employing agency shall adopt, subject to the approval of the municipality's governing authority, rules that define just cause. (b) Dismissal of Officer. – No career local law enforcement officer may be dismissed by an employing agency except for just cause. (c) Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard. – If an employing agency considers matters that could reasonably lead to the discharge of a law enforcement officer for punitive reasons, each employing agency shall establish minimum procedures to ensure that any officer is afforded notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard prior to the imposition of the disciplinary action against the officer. These procedures shall include, at a minimum, the right to a hearing before a fair and impartial board or hearing officer, the right to be represented at the officer's expense, the right to question any witnesses who give oral statements against the officer, the right to call witnesses and present evidence, and the right to have all meetings recorded for use at any supplemental adjudicatory hearing or court proceeding.
This section requires employing agencies to adopt just cause criteria before dismissing law enforcement officers and outlines the necessary procedures for disciplinary actions.
-
N.C.G.S. § 17F-5
§ 17F-5. Review boards. (a) Review Boards Established. – All municipalities subject to the provisions of this Chapter shall establish an impartial hearing officer or review board to review all disciplinary actions appealed by an aggrieved law enforcement officer and hold hearings for formal determination of a final decision of the review board. (b) Representation. – A law enforcement officer has the right to be represented at the officer's expense. (c) Witnesses. – At any hearing before a review board established pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, a law enforcement officer shall have the right to call witnesses and present all evidence in the officer's favor and to question any witness who has provided information to the employing agency that resulted in the commencement of the action before the review board. If a witness fails to show up at the hearing required by this section, that statement or evidence shall not be admitted, and the decision must be based on the remaining evidence. The rules of civil procedure and evidence may be used, but are not required, for hearings held by review boards pursuant to this section. (d) Recordings; Transcripts. – All hearings shall be recorded for a final adjudication in the event a court of competent jurisdiction requests the recording or a transcript of the recording. Any party wishing to receive a copy of the recording of a hearing proceeding required by this section shall be required to pay the cost of copying the recording only. A party wishing to receive transcripts shall be required to pay the cost of transcription.
This section mandates the establishment of review boards in municipalities for appeals of disciplinary actions against law enforcement officers.
-
N.C.G.S. § 17F-6
§ 17F-6. Certain review boards validated. Employing agencies using an established civil service system, agency review board, civilian complaint board, or personnel board that meets the minimum requirements established in G.S. 17F-4 or otherwise provides due process is in compliance with this Chapter.
This section validates certain existing review boards if they meet the minimum due process requirements.
-
N.C.G.S. § 17F-7
§ 17F-7. Adoption by ordinance. Each municipality employing law enforcement officers shall adopt an ordinance that provides the minimum rights required by this Chapter. The ordinance shall also include the composition, powers, and duties of the review board required by G.S. 17F-5. The ordinance shall establish a policy addressing dismissals, grievances by law enforcement officers, and the definition of 'just cause' for law enforcement officer dismissals.
This section requires municipalities to adopt ordinances outlining the rights of law enforcement officers in accordance with the new Chapter.
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Steinburg · Cosponsor
- Jr. Danny Earl Britt · Cosponsor
- Ralph Hise · Cosponsor
- Todd Johnson · Cosponsor
- W. Ted Alexander · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 174 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- W. Ted Alexander Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Steinburg
- Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican
- Ralph Hise Republican
- Todd Johnson Republican
Not signed on (174)
174 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 174 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 697?
- SB 697 is sponsored by Steinburg, Danny Earl Britt, Jr. (Republican), Ralph Hise (Republican), Todd Johnson (Republican), and W. Ted Alexander (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 697?
- This bill died with 2021-2022 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 697?
- Track SB 697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 697
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 697
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →