Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Expansion and Redesignation Act
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HR 920 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HR 920.
You're tracking HR 920
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HR 920 — Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Expansion and Redesignation Act
Last action — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 451.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 117th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Expansion and Redesignation Act This bill redesignates the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site currently located in Topeka, Kansas, as the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park. Further, the bill expands the park to include additional sites in Clarendon County, South Carolina, and establishes as affiliated areas specified sites in Farmville, Virginia; Wilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware; and the District of Columbia.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
153 added · 121 removedPlain-language change summary
The text changes the name of the "Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site" to the "Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park." It also updates references in U.S. law and documents to reflect this new designation. This matters because it helps clarify the official name of the site, which may impact how the site is recognized and referred to in legal and administrative contexts.
920 IntroducedReported in House (IH)](RH)] <DOC> 117thUnion CONGRESSCalendar 1stNo. Session H.
451 117th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
920 To[Report amendNo. the Act entitled ``Act to provide for the establishment of the Brown v.
117-627] To amend the Act entitled ``Act to provide for the establishment of the Brown v.
which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources _______________________________________________________________________December A14, BILL2022 ToAdditional amendsponsors: the Act entitled ``Act to provide for the establishment of the Brown v.
Mr.
Foster, Mr.
Hastings, Ms.
Kuster, Ms.
McCollum, and Ms.
Williams of Georgia December 14, 2022 Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 8, 2021] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Act entitled ``Act to provide for the establishment of the Brown v.
Board of Education National HistoricHistorical SitePark Expansion and Redesignation Act''.
REDESIGNATION OF THE BROWN V.
BOARD OF EDUCATION NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.
(a) In General.--The Brown v.
Board of Education National Historic Site established by Public Law 102-525 shall be known and designated as the ``Brown v.
Board of Education National Historical Park''.
(b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to the Brown v.
Board of Education National Historic Site shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Brown v.
Board of Education National Historical Park''.
SEC.
3.
BOARD OF EDUCATION NATIONAL HISTORICHISTORICAL SITE.PARK AND ESTABLISHMENT OF AFFILIATED AREAS.
In order to honor the civil rights stories of struggle, perseverance, and activism in the pursuit of education equity, thePublic ActLaw entitled102-525 ``Actis toamended provideas forfollows: the establishment of the Brown v.
Board(1) ofIn Educationsection National101, Historicby Siteadding inat the Stateend ofthe Kansas,following new paragraph-- ``(3) The terms `affiliated area' and for`affiliated otherareas' purposes''mean approvedone Octoberor 26,more 1992of (Publicthe Lawlocations 102-525;associated with the four court cases included in Brown v.
106 Stat.
3438 et seq.), is amended as follows:
(1) In section 101, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) The terms `affiliated area' and `affiliated areas' mean one or more of the locations associated with the four court cases included in Brown v.
and (C) by inserting after paragraph (6) (as so redesignated by this section), the following:following-- ``(7)(A) Summerton High School in Summerton, South Carolina, the all-White school that refused to admit the plaintiffs in Briggs v.
``(7) Summerton High School in South Carolina, the all- White school that refused to admit the plaintiffs in Briggs v.
Other``(B) sitesThe include former Scott's Branch High School, an `equalization school' in Summerton, South Carolina, constructed for African-American students in 1951 to provide facilities comparable to those of White students and that is now the Community Resource Center owned by Clarendon School District 1.
``(8) Robert Russa Moton High School, the all-Black school in Farmville, Virginia, which was the location of a student-led strike leading to Davis v.
Melvin Sharpe, President of the District of Columbia Board of Education, et al., has been designated a National Historic Landmark in recognition of its national significance.significance and is now the Robert Russa Moton Museum, governed by the Moton Museum, Inc.
The school, now the Robert Russa Moton Museum, is governed by the Moton Museum, Inc.
``(9)``(9)(A) Howard High School in Wilmington, Delaware, an all-all-Black Black school to which plaintiffs in Belton v.
Gebhart were forced to travel, has been designated a National Historic Landmark in recognition of its national significance.significance and is now the Howard High School of Technology, an active school administered by the New Castle County Vocational-Technical School District.
Now``(B) theThe Howardall-White Claymont High SchoolSchool, ofwhich Technology,denied itplaintiffs admission, and is annow activethe schoolClaymont Community Center administered by the NewBrandywine CastleCommunity CountyResource Vocational-TechnicalCouncil, SchoolInc. District.
``(C) The all-WhiteHockessin ClaymontSchool High#107C School,(Hockessin whichColored deniedSchool) plaintiffsis admission,the isall-Black nowschool thein ClaymontHockessin, CommunityDelaware Centerthat administeredone byof the Brandywineplaintiffs Communityin ResourceBelton Council,v. Inc.
TheGebhart Hockessinwas Schoolrequired #107Cto (Hockessinattend Coloredwith School)no ispublic thetransportation all-Blackprovided schooland inis Hockessin,now Delawareused thatby oneFriends of theHockessin plaintiffsColored inSchool Belton#107, v.Inc.
Show all 88 changed lines (48 more)
Gebhart was required to attend with no public transportation provided.
The former Hockessin School building is utilized by Friends of Hockessin Colored School #107, Inc.
Sharpe, has been designated a National Historic Landmark in recognition of its national significance.significance, is now the John Philip Sousa Middle School and is owned by the District of Columbia Department of General Services and administered by the District of Columbia Public Schools.''.
John Philip Sousa Junior High School, now John Philip Sousa Middle School, is owned by the District of Columbia Department of General Services and administered by the District of Columbia Public Schools.''.
WilmingtonWilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware;
``(c) Boundary Adjustment.-- ``(1) InAdditions.--In general.--In addition to land described in subsection (b), the historichistorical sitepark shall consist of the following land and interests in land identified as Summertongenerally Highdepicted Schoolon and Scott's Branch High School located in Clarendon County, South Carolina, after such land, or interests in land, is acquired by the Secretarymap andentitled the`Brown determinationv. is made under paragraph (2).
``(2)Board Determinationof byEducation secretary.--TheNational historicHistorical sitePark shallBoundary notAdditions beand expandedAffiliated untilAreas', thenumbered date462/178,449 onand whichdated theFebruary Secretary2022-- determines``(A) thatSummerton aHigh sufficientSchool quantitysite, of land, or interests in land,Summerton, hasClarendon beenCounty, acquiredSouth toCarolina; constitute a manageable park unit.
``(3)``(B) Notice.--NotThe laterformer thanScott's 30Branch daysHigh afterSchool thesite, date on which the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall publish in theSummerton, FederalClarendon RegisterCounty, noticeSouth ofCarolina; the expansion of the historic site.
``(4)and Map.--After``(C) theapproximately determinationone inacre subsection (2), the Secretary shall publish a new map of theland historicadjacent site to includeMonroe landElementary orSchool interests in landTopeka, acquiredShawnee underCounty, thisKansas. subsection.''.
``(2) Map.--The map described in paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.''.
(B) by striking ``:``States of Kansas'' and inserting ``State of Kansas or South Carolina'';
Provided,(C) however,by Thatstriking the''``: inserting ``The'';
andProvided, (C)however, byThat addingthe'' beforeand theinserting final``. period the following:
The'';
and (D) by adding before the final period the following:
(6) InBy sectionamending 105(c),subsection by(c) insertingof beforesection the105 finalto periodread theas following:follows:
``in``(c) Topeka,Management Kansas.Plan.--The Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate an amendment to the Brown v.
AfterBoard the boundary adjustment under section 103(c), the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of theEducation HouseNational ofHistorical RepresentativesPark andmanagement theplan Committeefor on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senatehistorical apark generalto managementinclude plan for the historic site locations in Summerton, Clarendon County, South Carolina''.Carolina.''.
``(a) In General.--TheGeneral.--Upon locationsthe associateddate withthat the threeSecretary courtdetermines casesthat includedan appropriate managing entity has been identified for that location, the following locations, as generally depicted on the map described in Brownsection v.103(c), shall be established as affiliated areas of the National Park System-- ``(1) `Robert Russa Moton Museum', in Farmville, Virginia;
Board``(2) of`Delaware EducationBrown ofv. Topeka described in sections 102(a) (8), (9), and (10) are established as affiliated areas of the National Park System.
``(b)Board Administration.--Theof affiliatedEducation areasCivil shallRights beSites', managedto include-- ``(A) the former Howard High School in accordanceWilmington, with--Delaware, ``(1)``(B) thisClaymont section;High School in Claymont, Delaware, and ``(C) Hockessin Colored School #107 in Hockessin, Delaware;
and ``(2)``(3) any`John lawPhilip generallySousa applicableMiddle toSchool' unitsin ofWashington, theDistrict Nationalof ParkColumbia. System.
``(c)``(b) GeneralAdministration.--Upon Managementestablishment, Plan.-- ``(1) In general.--Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the management entity of each affiliated area,area shall developbe amanaged general management plan for each of the affiliated areas in accordancea withmanner sectionconsistent 100502with-- of``(1) titlethis 54,Act; United States Code.
The general management plan shall-- ``(A) be prepared in consultation and coordination``(2) withlaws thegenerally interestedapplicable State,to county,units and local governments, management entities, organizations, and interested members of the publicNational associatedPark withSystem. the affiliated area;
``(B)``(c) identify,Management asPlans.-- appropriate,``(1) theIn rolesgeneral.--Not andlater responsibilitiesthan three years after an affiliated area has been established in accordance with subsection (a), subject to the availability of appropriations, the NationalSecretary, Parkin Serviceconsultation andwith the management entity inof administeringeach andestablished interpretingaffiliated area, shall develop a management plan for each of the affiliated areaareas inthat suchshall-- a``(A) mannerbe thatprepared itin doesconsultation notand interferecoordination with existingthe operationsinterested andState, continuedcounty, useand oflocal existinggovernments; facilities;
management entities;
organizations and interested members of the public associated with the affiliated areas;
``(B) identify, as appropriate, the roles and responsibilities of the National Park Service and each management entity in administering and interpreting the affiliated area in such a manner that it does not interfere with existing operations and continued use of existing facilities;
Board of Education National HistoricHistorical Site.Park.
``(2) Public comment.--The Secretary shall-- ``(A) hold not less than one public meeting in the general proximity of each affiliated area on the proposed general management plan, including opportunities for public comment;
and ``(B) publish the draft general management plan on the internet and provide an opportunity for public comment.
``(3) Transmittal.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall transmit the general management plan for each affiliated area developed under subparagraphthis (1)subsection to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.
``(d) ManagementCooperative Entity.--TheAgreements.--The organizationsSecretary describedmay inprovide paragraphstechnical (8),and (9),financial assistance and (10)enter ofinto sectioncooperative 102(a)agreements shallwith be the management entity for itseach affiliated area to provide financial assistance for the marketing, marking, interpretation, and preservation of the respective affiliated area.
``(e) CooperativeLand Agreements.--TheUse.--Nothing Secretaryin maythis providesection technicalshall assistanceaffect andthe grantsland anduse enterrights intoof cooperativeprivate agreementsproperty withowners thewithin managementor entityadjacent forto eachthe affiliated areaareas, toincluding provideactivities financialor assistanceuses foron theprivate marketing,land marking,that interpretation,can andbe preservationseen ofor heard within the respectiveaffiliated areas and the authorities for management entities to operate and administer the affiliated area.areas.
``(f) LandLimited Use.--NothingRole of the Secretary.--Nothing in this section affectsauthorizes landthe useSecretary rightsto ofacquire private property ownersin withinan or adjacent to the affiliated areas,area including activities or usesto onassume privatefinancial landresponsibility thatfor canthe beoperation, seenmaintenance, or heard within the affiliated areas and the authorities for management entitiesof toan operate and administer the affiliated areas.area.
``(g) LimitedOwnership.--Each Role of the Secretary.--Nothing in this section authorizes the Secretary to acquire property in an affiliated area orshall continue to assumebe overallowned, financialoperated, responsibilityand formanaged theby operation,its maintenance,respective orpublic managementand ofprivate anowners.''. affiliated area.
Each affiliated area shall continue to be owned, operated, and managed by its respective public and private owners.''.
(9)Amend Inthe sectiontitle 107 (as so redesignatedas byto thisread: subsection), by inserting before the period the following:
``at``A thebill historicto site,expand and thereredesignate isBrown authorizedv. to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out sections 103(c) and 106''.
<all>Board National Historic Site as Brown v.
Board National Historical Park, and for other purposes.''.
Union Calendar No.
451 117th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
R.
920 [Report No.
117-627] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend the Act entitled ``Act to provide for the establishment of the Brown v.
Board of Education National Historic Site in the State of Kansas, and for other purposes'' to provide for inclusion of additional related sites in the National Park System, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ December 14, 2022 Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
Show all 88 changed rows (48 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Reported Reported in House Current html December 14, 2022
- Introduced Introduced in House html February 08, 2021
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill redesignates the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site as a National Historical Park and expands it to include additional affiliated areas significant to the civil rights movement.
-
Public Law 102-525
Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site→ Brown v. Board of Education National Historical ParkChanges the designation of the site to a National Historical Park.
-
Public Law 102-525
The terms `affiliated area' and `affiliated areas' mean one or more of the locations associated with the four court cases included in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka described in section 102(a)(8), (9), and (10).→ The terms `affiliated area' and `affiliated areas' mean one or more of the locations associated with the four court cases included in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka described in section 102(a)(8), (9), and (10).Defines 'affiliated area' to include additional locations associated with broader court cases.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 102(a)
``(3) The Brown case was joined by four other cases related to school segregation pending before the Supreme Court (Briggs v. Elliott...and consolidated into one case named Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. ``(4) A 1999 historic resources study examined the five cases included in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and found each to be nationally significant...''
Adds historical context about the related court cases that contributed to the Brown v. Board decision.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 102(a)
``(7)(A) Summerton High School...used as administrative offices for Clarendon School District 1. (B) The former Scott's Branch High School...owned by Clarendon School District 1. ``(8) Robert Russa Moton High School...governed by the Moton Museum, Inc. and affiliated with Longwood University.``... (10) John Philip Sousa Junior High School...administered by the District of Columbia Public Schools.''
Incorporates specific historic schools into the designation of affiliated areas.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 102(b)(3)
National Register of Historic Places→ ..., protection, preservation, Kansas; Summerton, South Carolina; Farmville, Virginia; Wilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware; and the District of ColumbiaBroadens the scope of preservation efforts to include new locations significant to educational equity.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 103(c)
...Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Boundary Additions and Affiliated Areas...
Establishes boundary adjustments to include specific new sites and areas to be incorporated into the historical park.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 105(c)
The Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Natural Resources...an amendment to the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park management plan...for the historical park to include the locations in Summerton, Clarendon County, South Carolina.
Mandates the creation of a management plan that incorporates new affiliated areas.
-
Public Law 102-525
section 103(b)→ subsections (b) and (c) of section 103Clarifies that the management and developmental guidelines apply to both subsections of Section 103.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 104
States of Kansas→ State of Kansas or South CarolinaExpands the jurisdiction for land use to also include South Carolina.
-
Public Law 102-525, Section 104
: Provided, however, That the→ . TheRemoves conditional language to make the law more straightforward.
Action History
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-627.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 117-627.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 451.
-
Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Discharged.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
-
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
-
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Sponsors
- James E. Clyburn · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Clyburn, James E. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 920 do?
- Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park Expansion and Redesignation Act This bill redesignates the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site currently located in Topeka, Kansas, as the Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park. Further, the bill expands the park to include additional sites in Clarendon County, South Carolina, and establishes as affiliated areas specified sites in Farmville, Virginia; Wilmington, Claymont, and Hockessin, Delaware; and the District of Columbia.
- Who sponsors HR 920?
- HR 920 is sponsored by Clyburn, James E. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HR 920?
- This bill died with 117th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 920?
- Track HR 920 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 920
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 920
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →