HR 781 — GIG Act
Last action — Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The GIG Act clarifies the definition of independent contractors under federal law.
This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to define independent contractors more clearly. It specifies the conditions under which an individual performing services for another is considered an independent contractor.
Summary
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the status of an independent contractor, and for other purposes.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in House Current html February 02, 2023
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies the definition of 'independent contractor' within the Fair Labor Standards Act by adding specific considerations for determining employee status.
-
29 U.S.C. 203(e)
(6)(A) The term `employee' does not include an individual who performs services for another person as an independent contractor, as determined by the Secretary. In making such determination, the Secretary shall consider that an individual is likely to be performing services for another person as an independent contractor if such individual-- (i) exercises substantial control over key aspects of the performance of such services; and (ii) has the opportunity to earn profits or incur losses based on the exercise of initiative or management of investment by such individual. (B) In any case in which the Secretary determines that the considerations described in subparagraph (A) are not dispositive as to whether an individual is performing services for another person as an independent contractor, the Secretary may also consider that the individual is likely to be performing such services as an independent contractor if such services-- (i) require specialized training or skills that such person does not provide; and (ii) are performed-- (I) on a continuous basis (including on a seasonal basis); and (II) as part of an integrated unit. (C) In making any determination under this paragraph as to whether an individual is performing services for another person as an independent contractor, the Secretary shall only consider actual practices between the individual and such person, without regard to-- (i) any contractual agreement or any other expectation of either party that is not regularly met in the course of performing such services; and (ii) any services that the individual performs that-- (I) are not for such person; and (II) are not substantially similar to the services that such individual performs for such person.
This addition defines criteria under which an individual providing services can be considered an independent contractor rather than an employee, which could impact labor regulations and protections.
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
Sponsors
- Carol D. Miller · Cosponsor
- Mike Garcia · Cosponsor
- Austin Scott · Cosponsor
- Burgess Owens · Cosponsor
- Harriet M. Hageman · Cosponsor
- Tom Cole · Cosponsor
- Tom McClintock · Cosponsor
- Jay Obernolte · Cosponsor
- Barry Moore · Cosponsor
- Jerry L. Carl · Cosponsor
- Juan Ciscomani · Cosponsor
- A. Drew Ferguson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 535 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ferguson, A. Drew Republican
Co-sponsors (11)
- Miller, Carol D. Republican
- Garcia, Mike Republican
- Scott, Austin Republican
- Owens, Burgess Republican
- Hageman, Harriet M. Republican
- Cole, Tom Republican
- McClintock, Tom Republican
- Obernolte, Jay Republican
- Moore, Barry Republican
- Carl, Jerry L. Republican
- Ciscomani, Juan Republican
Not signed on (535)
535 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 535 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 781 do?
- To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the status of an independent contractor, and for other purposes.
- Who sponsors HR 781?
- HR 781 is sponsored by Miller, Carol D. (Republican), Garcia, Mike (Republican), Scott, Austin (Republican), Owens, Burgess (Republican), Hageman, Harriet M. (Republican), Cole, Tom (Republican), McClintock, Tom (Republican), Obernolte, Jay (Republican), Moore, Barry (Republican), Carl, Jerry L. (Republican), Ciscomani, Juan (Republican), and Ferguson, A. Drew (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 781?
- This bill died with 118th Congress. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HR 781?
- Track HR 781 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 781
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 781
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →