South Florida Clean Coastal Waters Act of 2021
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 66 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 66.
You're tracking S 66
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 66 — South Florida Clean Coastal Waters Act of 2021
Last action — Became Public Law No: 117-144.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
79 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of the bill includes a change in the contents of the integrated assessment required for harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida. Specifically, it removes the requirement to examine "the status of, and gaps within, current harmful algal bloom and hypoxia research, monitoring, management, prevention, response, and control activities that directly affect the region." This change means the assessment will now focus solely on the causes, consequences, and potential approaches to reduce these environmental issues without evaluating existing research and activities in the area.
[Congressional[117th BillsCongress 117thPublic Congress]Law 144] [From the U.S.
Government Publishing Office] [S.[[Page 1265]] SOUTH FLORIDA CLEAN COASTAL WATERS ACT OF 2021 [[Page 136 STAT.
661266]] EngrossedPublic inLaw Senate117-144 (ES)]117th <DOC>Congress 117thAn CONGRESSAct 2dTo Sessionrequire S.the Inter-Agency Task Force on Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia to develop a plan for reducing, mitigating, and controlling harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida, and for other purposes.
66<<NOTE: _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To require the Inter-Agency Task Force on Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia to develop a plan for reducing, mitigating, and controlling harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida, and for other purposes.
BeJune it16, enacted2022 by- the[S. Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.
SHORT66]>> TITLE.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE:
South Florida Clean Coastal Waters Act of 2021.>> SECTION 1.
<<NOTE:
33 USC 4001 note.>> SHORT TITLE.
4001 et seq.) is amended-- (1) by redesignating sections 605 through 609 as<<NOTE: sections through 610, respectively;
33 USC 4005-4009.>> as sections 606 through 610, respectively;
SOUTH<<NOTE: FLORIDA HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS AND HYPOXIA.
``(a)Deadlines. South Florida.--In this section, the term `South Florida' means-- ``(1) all lands and waters within the administrative boundaries of the South Florida Water Management District;
33 USC 4004a.>> SOUTH FLORIDA HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS AND HYPOXIA.
``(a) South Florida.
<<NOTE:
Definition.>> --In this section, the term `South Florida' means-- ``(1) all lands and waters within the administrative boundaries of the South Florida Water Management District;
``(3) Contents of integrated assessment.--Theassessment. integrated assessment required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall examine the causes, consequences, and potential approaches to reduce harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida, and the status of, and gaps within, current harmful algal bloom and hypoxia research, monitoring, management, prevention, response, and control activities that directly affect the region by-- ``(A) Federal agencies;
<<NOTE:
Examination.>> --The integrated assessment required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall examine the causes, consequences, and potential approaches to reduce harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida, [[Page 136 STAT.
1267]] and the status of, and gaps within, current harmful algal bloom and hypoxia research, monitoring, management, prevention, response, and control activities that directly affect the region by-- ``(A) Federal agencies;
``(B) develop<<NOTE: a timeline and budgetary requirements for deployment of future assets;
Timeline.
Budget.>> develop a timeline and budgetary requirements for deployment of future assets;
``(3) Requirements.--In developing the action plan, the Task Force shall-- ``(A) consult<<NOTE: with the State of Florida, and affected local and tribal governments;
``(B)Consultation.>> consult with representativesthe fromState regionalof academic,Florida, agricultural,and industry,affected local and othertribal stakeholdergovernments; groups;
``(B) <<NOTE:
Consultation.>> consult with representatives from regional academic, agricultural, industry, and other stakeholder groups;
``(E) evaluate<<NOTE: cost-effective, incentive-based partnership approaches;
Evaluation.>> evaluate cost- effective, incentive-based partnership approaches;
``(H)[[Page publish136 aSTAT. summary of the proposed plan in the Federal Register at least 180 days prior to submitting the completed plan to Congress;
and1268]] ``(I)``(H) after<<NOTE: submitting the completed plan to Congress, provide biennial progress reports on the activities toward achieving the objectives of the plan.''.
(b)Federal ClericalRegister, Amendmentpublication. and Correction.--The table of contents in section 2 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1998 (Public Law 105- 383) is amended by striking the items relating to title VI and inserting the following new items:
Summary.
Time period.>> publish a summary of the proposed plan in the Federal Register at least days prior to submitting the completed plan to Congress;
and ``(I) <<NOTE:
Reports.>> after submitting the completed plan to Congress, provide biennial progress reports on the activities toward achieving the objectives of the plan.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment and Correction.--The table of contents in section 2 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1998 (Public Law 105- 383) <<NOTE:
112 Stat.
3412.>> is amended by striking the items relating to title VI and inserting the following new items:
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
PassedApproved theJune Senate16, March 8 (legislative day, March 7), 2022.
Attest:LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.
Secretary.66:
117th--------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONGRESSSENATE 2dREPORTS: Session S.
66No. _______________________________________________________________________ AN ACT To require the Inter-Agency Task Force on Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia to develop a plan for reducing, mitigating, and controlling harmful algal blooms and hypoxia in South Florida, and for other purposes.
117-64 (Comm.
on Commerce, Science, and Transportation).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol.
168 (2022):
Mar.
8, considered and passed Senate.
May 10, 11, considered and passed House.
<all>
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Public Law Current html June 17, 2022
- Engrossed Engrossed in Senate html March 08, 2022
- Reported Reported to Senate html December 17, 2021
- Introduced Introduced in Senate html January 27, 2021
- Enrolled Enrolled Bill html
Action History
-
Signed by President.
-
Signed by President.
-
Became Public Law No: 117-144.
-
Became Public Law No: 117-144.
-
Presented to President.
-
Presented to President.
-
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4832-4833)
-
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 7 (Roll no. 152).
-
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 7 (Roll no. 152). (text: 05/10/2022 CR H4731-4732)
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
Ms. Stevens moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
-
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4731-4733)
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 66.
-
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
-
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S1066-1067; text: CR S1066-1067)
-
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1066-1067; text: CR S1066-1067)
-
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
-
Received in the House.
-
Held at the desk.
-
By Senator Cantwell from Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation filed written report. Report No. 117-64.
-
By Senator Cantwell from Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation filed written report. Report No. 117-64.
-
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cantwell without amendment. Without written report.
-
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cantwell without amendment. Without written report.
-
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 203.
-
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sponsors
- Marco Rubio · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rubio, Marco Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (546)
546 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 546 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 66?
- S 66 is sponsored by Rubio, Marco (Republican).
- What is the current status of S 66?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track S 66?
- Track S 66 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 66
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 66
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →