HB 35 — Restorative housing and isolated confinement; restrictions on use.
Last action — Continued from last session
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House of Delegates
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House of Delegates. Introduced December 23, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House of Delegates
Current position in the legislative process.
-
12 sponsors
1 primary, 11 co-sponsors signed on.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill restricts the use of isolated confinement in state correctional facilities.
This bill prohibits isolated confinement in state facilities except under certain conditions. It requires frequent reviews of placements and ensures incarcerated individuals receive medical evaluations after being placed in such settings.
Summary
Restorative housing and isolated confinement; restrictions on use. Prohibits the use of isolated confinement, defined in the bill, in state correctional facilities, subject to certain exceptions. The bill requires that before placing an incarcerated person in restorative housing or isolated confinement for his own protection, the facility administrator shall place an incarcerated person in a less-restrictive setting, including by transferring such person to another institution or to a special-purpose housing unit for incarcerated persons who face similar threats. The bill requires that if an incarcerated person is placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement, such placement shall be reviewed every two business days and the facility administrator shall ensure that the incarcerated person receives a medical and mental health evaluation from certified medical and mental health professionals within one working day of placement in restorative housing or any form of isolated confinement. The bill also requires the facility administrator to notify the regional administrator in writing that an incarcerated person was placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement within 24 hours of such placement. Finally, the bill requires that formal reviews of an incarcerated person's placement in any form of isolated confinement shall be held in such person's presence, inform him of any reasons administrative officials believe isolated confinement remains necessary, and give the incarcerated person an opportunity to respond to those reasons, and a formal ruling shall be provided to the incarcerated individual within 24 hours.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
148 added · 145 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 35 update the definitions surrounding isolated confinement and medical evaluations in Virginia's correctional facilities. Notably, the term "medical evaluation" now explicitly states that it should be conducted in line with the recommendations of a medical practitioner, promoting more consistent and reliable health assessments for incarcerated individuals. This change is important because it aims to ensure that medical care is prioritized and appropriately coordinated, potentially improving the health outcomes for those in custody.
OFFERED FOR CONSIDERATION 3/06/2026 + +2027 +SESSION + +ENGROSSED + + + 26101905D HOUSE BILL NO.
35 +House +Amendments AMENDMENTin IN[ THE] NATURE- OFFebruary A11, SUBSTITUTE2026 + + (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services + on ________________) + + (Patron Prior to Substitute—Delegate Cole, J.G.) + A BILL to amend and reenact § 53.1-39.2 of the Code of Virginia, relating to restorative housing and isolated confinement;
Be————— itPatron enactedPrior byto theEngrossment—Delegate GeneralCole, AssemblyJ.G. of Virginia:
1.————— Referred to Committee on Public Safety E ————— Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
N 1.
G R A.
"Facility administrator" means the superintendent, warden, or person otherwise in charge of the O correctional facility.
"Isolated confinement" means confinement of an incarcerated person to a cell for 17 hours or more per S day, regardless of the name of the housing unit in which such confinement occurs.
S "Lockdown" means the restriction of movement and privileges for an entire pod, housing unit, or facility, such that all individuals therein are confined to their cells for 20 or more hours per day, and out-of-cell E programmatic interventions are interrupted.
D "Medical evaluation" means an evaluation that is done for the purpose of determining whether the incarcerated person needs medical treatment and shall be done in a manner that is consistent with the signed recommendations of a medical practitioner.
H "Mental health professional" means the same as that term is defined in § 54.1-2400.1 who is trained in B mental health evaluations.
5 "Out-of-cell programmatic interventions" means that the incarcerated person is either in a congregate E setting with other incarcerated persons receiving educational, vocational, rehabilitative, or therapeutic instruction or is individually with one or more staff members who will be offering medical, mental health, or DRAFT OFFERED FOR CONSIDERATION 3/06/2026 some other social service.
"Recreation" means the space and opportunity for meaningful physical activity outside the cell and 35 housing unit.
36 "Restorative housing" means special purpose bed assignments operated under maximum security / 37 regulations and procedures and utilized for the personal protection or custodial management of an 38 incarcerated person.
39 B.
No incarcerated person in a state correctional facility shall be placed in restorative housing or in isolated confinement by any designation,designation for longer than 15 consecutive days, including any investigative time, in any 60-day period, unless (i) such incarcerated person requests placement in restorative housing or isolated confinement with informed voluntary consent,;
NoWhen an incarcerated person inmakes a staterequest correctionalto be placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement for his own protection, the facility shall bebear placedthe burden of establishing a basis for refusing the request;, but before placing an incarcerated person in restorative housing or isolated confinement byof any designation for longerhis thanown 15protection, consecutivethe days,facility administrator shall place an incarcerated person in a less- restrictive setting, including anyby investigativetransfer time,to northe general population of another institution or to a special- purpose housing unit for moreincarcerated thanpersons 15who totalface dayssimilar inthreats, anyunless 60-daythe period;incarcerated person faces a security risk so great that no less-restrictive setting would be sufficient or practicable to ensure the incarcerated person's safety.
however, such placement may be for more than 15 total days in a 60-day period (i) when (a) such incarcerated person requests such placement in restorative housing or isolated confinement with informed voluntary consent;
(b) such incarcerated person needs such placement for his own protection, as determined and documented by the facility head or designee;
or (c) the placement is necessary for medical isolation, as determined and documented by a licensed medical professional, and (ii) provided that such placement is no longer than 15 consecutive days.
An incarcerated person may be placed in an additional period of isolated confinement, not to exceed a single period of 15 consecutive days, only in those situations where a new, documented incident of behavioral misconduct occurs after the completion of the initial period of isolated confinement and such behavioral misconduct creates an imminent threat of physical harm to the incarcerated person or another person and such threat cannot be alleviated through any less restrictive measures.
WhenAn an incarcerated person makeswho ais request to be placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement for his own protection,protection theHB35E facility2 shall bear the burden of establishing3 abased basison forhis refusingrequest theor DRAFTwith OFFEREDhis FORinformed CONSIDERATIONvoluntary 3/06/2026consent request;,may butopt beforeout placingof an incarcerated person in restorative housing or isolated confinement ofby anyvoluntarily designationremoving for his ownconsent protection,to theremain facility administrator shall place an incarcerated person in arestorative less- restrictive setting, including by transfer to the general population of another institution or to a special- purpose housing unit for incarcerated persons who face similar threats, unless the incarcerated person faces a security risk so great that no less-restrictive setting would be sufficient or practicableisolated toconfinement ensureby theproviding incarceratedinformed person'svoluntary safety.refusal;.
2.
3.
An incarcerated person who is in restorative housing or isolated confinement for his own protection based on his request or with his informed voluntary consent may opt out of restorative housing or isolated confinement by voluntarily removing his consent to remain in restorative housing or isolated confinement by providing informed voluntary refusal;.
4.
5.
In any situation in which the facility administrator determines that an incarcerated person shall be placed in isolated confinement to prevent an imminent threat of physical harm to the incarcerated person or another person, the incarcerated person may be placed in isolated confinement for no longer than 15 consecutive days, including any investigative time period.
An incarcerated person may be placed in an additional period of isolated confinement, not to exceed a single period of 15 consecutive days, only in those situations where a new, documented incident of behavioral misconduct occurs after the completion of the initial period of isolated confinement and such behavioral misconduct creates an imminent threat of physical harm to the incarcerated person or another person and such threat cannot be alleviated through any less restrictive measures.
Such programmatic interventions and congregate activities shall be consistent with those offered to the full-privilege general population at other facilities of equal security riskrisk. and shall take place in a congregate setting, unless exceptional circumstances mean that doing so would create significant and unreasonable risk to the safety and security of other incarcerated persons, the staff, or the facility.
Additionally, a minimum of one hour of recreation shall be provided and shall take place in a congregate setting, unless exceptional circumstances mean that doing so would create significant and unreasonable risk to the safety and security of other incarcerated persons, the staff, or the facility.
If an incarcerated person is placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement pursuant to subsection B, (i) such placement shall be reviewed once a week every [ 48 hours two business days ] and the reason why a DRAFT OFFERED FOR CONSIDERATION 3/06/2026 less restrictive setting could not be utilized and the facts and circumstances that necessitated the incarcerated person's placement in restorative housing or any form of isolated confinement shall be recorded in writing by the facility administrator and placed in the incarcerated person's institutional file;
(iii) shall end as soon as that purpose is of 3 served;
(v) shall have a documented DRAFT OFFERED FOR CONSIDERATION 3/06/2026 timeline and standard of completion when lasting more than seven days;
and (vi) may not occur more than once within 30 days without approval from the regional administrator confirming that a new, specific, documented security risk has developed that warrants such extensive lockdowns, including the reasons why security cannot be maintained without additional lockdown time.
Such documentation shall be provided totoy the Director and published on the Department's website.
The facility administrator shall ensure that any incarcerated person placed in restorative housing, for any reason, is provided with a medical evaluation and a mental health evaluation within one workday of such placement,placF. unless such evaluation was completed within the previous week.
F.
N G.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the placement of incarcerated persons in G protective custody settings that do not constitute restorative housing.
Show all 42 changed lines (2 more)
R H.
O S S E D H E
Show all 42 changed rows (2 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed View text Current pdf
- Substitute Rehabilitation and Social Services Substitute pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Continued from last session
-
Continued to next session in Rehabilitation and Social Services (15-Y 0-N)
-
Senate committee offered
-
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB35)
-
Referred to Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services
-
Constitutional reading dispensed (on 1st reading)
-
Read third time and passed House (66-Y 31-N 0-A)
-
Engrossed by House as amended
-
committee amendment agreed to
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Reported from Appropriations with amendment(s) (15-Y 7-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (5-Y 2-N)
-
House subcommittee offered
-
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (HB35)
-
Assigned HAPP sub: Transportation & Public Safety
-
Reported from Public Safety and referred to Appropriations (15-Y 7-N)
-
Subcommittee recommends reporting and referring to Appropriations (5-Y 2-N)
-
Assigned HPS sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Public Safety
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26101905D
Sponsors
- Kathy K.L. Tran · Cosponsor
- Holly M. Seibold · Cosponsor
- Sam Rasoul · Cosponsor
- Adele Y. McClure · Cosponsor
- Phil M. Hernandez · Cosponsor
- Rae Cousins · Cosponsor
- Nadarius E. Clark · Cosponsor
- Lamont Bagby · Cosponsor
- Karen Keys-Gamarra · Cosponsor
- Patrick A. Hope · Cosponsor
- Joshua G. Cole · Primary
- Stacey Annie Carroll · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 136 not signed on
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 35 do?
- Restorative housing and isolated confinement; restrictions on use. Prohibits the use of isolated confinement, defined in the bill, in state correctional facilities, subject to certain exceptions. The bill requires that before placing an incarcerated person in restorative housing or isolated confinement for his own protection, the facility administrator shall place an incarcerated person in a less-restrictive setting, including by transferring such person to another institution or to a special-purpose housing unit for incarcerated persons who face similar threats. The bill requires that if an incarcerated person is placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement, such placement shall be reviewed every two business days and the facility administrator shall ensure that the incarcerated person receives a medical and mental health evaluation from certified medical and mental health professionals within one working day of placement in restorative housing or any form of isolated confinement. The bill also requires the facility administrator to notify the regional administrator in writing that an incarcerated person was placed in restorative housing or isolated confinement within 24 hours of such placement. Finally, the bill requires that formal reviews of an incarcerated person's placement in any form of isolated confinement shall be held in such person's presence, inform him of any reasons administrative officials believe isolated confinement remains necessary, and give the incarcerated person an opportunity to respond to those reasons, and a formal ruling shall be provided to the incarcerated individual within 24 hours.
- Who sponsors HB 35?
- HB 35 is sponsored by Kathy K.L. Tran, Holly M. Seibold, Sam Rasoul, Adele Y. McClure, Phil M. Hernandez, Rae Cousins, Nadarius E. Clark, Lamont Bagby, Karen Keys-Gamarra, Patrick A. Hope, Joshua G. Cole, and Stacey Annie Carroll.
- What is the current status of HB 35?
- This bill has passed the House of Delegates. Introduced December 23, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 35?
- Track HB 35 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 35
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 35
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →