An Act to enhance safety and security in courthouses
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H1840 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H1840.
You're tracking H1840
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H1840 — An Act to enhance safety and security in courthouses
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An Act to enhance safety and security in courthouses
Bill Text
- Full text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill enhances penalties for certain offenses related to disruptions and assaults occurring in Massachusetts judicial properties and proceedings.
-
Chapter 265, Section 13D1/4
Section 13D1/4. Whoever commits an assault or an assault and battery in or on the property owned, leased or occupied by the Massachusetts judicial department or an agency or committee thereof, including any trial or appellate court, during the time when the courts are in session or open to the public may be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years, or by a fine of not more than $25,000 or by both such fine and imprisonment.
A new offense is created for assaults on judicial property with significant penalties.
-
Chapter 268, Section 13C
Whoever causes or actively participates in the willful disruption of proceedings of any court of the commonwealth may be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than six months or in state prison for not more than three years, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment.→ Whoever causes or actively participates in the willful disruption of proceedings of any court of the commonwealth may be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one half years or in state prison for not more than three years, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the commonwealth of its power of contempt.This change clarifies the penalties for disrupting court proceedings while maintaining the court's contempt powers.
-
Chapter 275, Section 4
If the person complained of is convicted, he may be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months,→ If the person complained of is convicted, he may be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, provided that any threat to cause bodily injury to a person on account of the person's performance of official duties as a judge, employee of the judicial department, including but not limited to clerk magistrates, probation officers, interpreters, stenographers, and court officers, prosecutors and attorneys may be punished by imprisonment in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one half years or in state prison for not more than three years, or by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment.The penalties for threatening judicial officials are increased.
Sponsors
- David Paul Linsky · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- David Paul Linsky Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (203)
203 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 203 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H1840 do?
- An Act to enhance safety and security in courthouses
- Who sponsors H1840?
- H1840 is sponsored by David Paul Linsky (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H1840?
- This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H1840?
- Track H1840 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H1840
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H1840
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →