An Act amending the act of December 18, 2001 (P.L.949, No.114), known as the Workforce Development Act, in ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 601 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 601.
You're tracking SB 601
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 601 — An Act amending the act of December 18, 2001 (P.L.949, No.114), known as the Workforce Development Act, in preliminary provisions, providing for preference for training programs.
Last action — Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. 0670 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill adds provisions to the Workforce Development Act to provide placement preferences in training programs for members of the Pennsylvania National Guard and their spouses after active duty.
-
Section 105
Section 105. Preference for training programs. (a) Pennsylvania National Guard and reserve component members.--Unless prohibited by Federal law or regulation, a member of the Pennsylvania National Guard or a reserve component of the United States Armed Forces who has been ordered to active Federal or State service shall be given a preference for placement in any program under this act for a period of one year after discharge of the member from active duty. Preference for placement shall be given after the member provides documentation of the dates of active duty and meets the eligibility requirements of the program. (b) Spouses.--Unless prohibited by Federal law or regulation, a spouse of a member of the Pennsylvania National Guard or a reserve component of the United States Armed Forces who has been ordered to active Federal or State service shall be given a preference for placement in any program under this act for a period of one year after discharge of the member from active duty. Preference for placement shall be given after the spouse provides documentation of the member's dates of active duty and meets the eligibility requirements of the program.
This establishes a preference in training program placements for members of the National Guard and their spouses after they complete their active duty service.
Action History
-
Laid on the table (Pursuant to Senate Rule 9)
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
PN 0670 Referred to LABOR AND INDUSTRY
Sponsors
- Anthony H. Williams · Cosponsor
- Judy Ward · Cosponsor
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Sabatina · Primary
- Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
- Wayne Langerholc · Cosponsor
- Folmer · Cosponsor
- Killion · Cosponsor
- Wayne D. Fontana · Cosponsor
- Mensch · Cosponsor
- Vincent J. Hughes · Cosponsor
- Blake · Cosponsor
- Regan · Cosponsor
- Browne · Cosponsor
- Art Haywood · Cosponsor
- Brewster · Cosponsor
- Iovino · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 236 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sabatina
Co-sponsors (16)
- Anthony H. Williams Democratic
- Judy Ward Republican
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
- Wayne Langerholc Republican
- Folmer
- Killion
- Wayne D. Fontana Democratic
- Mensch
- Vincent J. Hughes Democratic
- Blake
- Regan
- Browne
- Art Haywood Democratic
- Brewster
- Iovino
Not signed on (236)
236 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 236 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| FOLMER | — | Yea |
| IOVINO | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 601?
- SB 601 is sponsored by Anthony H. Williams (Democratic), Judy Ward (Republican), Jay Costa (Democratic), Sabatina, Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Wayne Langerholc (Republican), Folmer, Killion, Wayne D. Fontana (Democratic), Mensch, Vincent J. Hughes (Democratic), Blake, Regan, Browne, Art Haywood (Democratic), Brewster, and Iovino.
- What is the current status of SB 601?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 601?
- Track SB 601 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 601
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 601
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →