An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in p...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 516 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 516.
You're tracking SB 516
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 516 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in particular rights and immunities, providing for liability rules applicable to product sellers.
Last action — PN 0547 Referred to JUDICIARY
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Printer's No. 0547 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill establishes specific liability rules for product sellers in product liability cases in Pennsylvania.
-
42 Pa.C.S. § 8320.1
§ 8320.1. Liability rules applicable to product sellers. (a) General rule.--In a product liability action, a product seller other than a manufacturer may not be liable for damages resulting in death, injury to person or property or economic loss unless the plaintiff establishes at least one of the following: (1) (i) The product that allegedly caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff was sold by the product seller, the product seller failed to exercise reasonable care with respect to the product before placing the product in the stream of commerce and the failure to exercise reasonable care was a proximate cause of the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (ii) For purposes of this paragraph, a product seller may not be considered to have failed to exercise reasonable care with respect to the product based upon an alleged failure to inspect a product where there was no reasonable opportunity to inspect the product in a manner that, in the exercise of reasonable care, would have revealed the aspect of the product that allegedly caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (2) The product seller made an express warranty applicable to the product that allegedly caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff independent of an express warranty made by a manufacturer as to the same product, the product failed to conform to the product seller's express warranty and the failure of the product to conform to the product seller's express warranty caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (3) The product seller, before placing the product in the stream of commerce, exercised significant control over the design, manufacture, packaging or labeling of the product related to the alleged defect in the product that caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (4) The product seller, before placing the product in the stream of commerce, knew or reasonably should have known of the defect in the product that caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff or the product seller was in possession of facts from which a reasonable person would conclude that the product seller had or should have had knowledge of the alleged defect in the product that caused the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (5) The product seller engaged in intentional wrongdoing that was a proximate cause of the harm complained of by the plaintiff. (6) The product seller, before placing the product in the stream of commerce, held itself out as the manufacturer to the user of the product, in which case the product seller shall be liable as though the product seller were the manufacturer of the product. (b) Rental and leases.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a product seller who is engaged in the business of renting or leasing a product shall be subject to liability under subsection (a) but may not be liable to a plaintiff for the tortious act of another solely by reason of ownership of the product. (c) Certification of manufacturer identity.--(1) In a product liability action against a product seller, the product seller may file an affidavit certifying the correct identity of the manufacturer of the product that allegedly caused the injury, death or damage. (2) The product seller shall exercise due diligence in providing the plaintiff with the correct identity of the manufacturer. (d) Definitions.--As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection: "Manufacturer." A person who: (1) Produced, created, made or constructed the product or component part of the product. (2) Designed or formulated the product or component part of the product or engaged another person to design or formulate the product or component part of the product. "Product seller." A person who, in the course of a business conducted for that purpose, sells, distributes, rents, leases, prepares, packages, labels or otherwise is involved in placing a product in the stream of commerce.
This new section outlines the circumstances under which product sellers can be held liable in product liability actions, significantly limiting their liability compared to manufacturers.
Action History
-
PN 0547 Referred to JUDICIARY
Sponsors
- Kristin Phillips-Hill · Cosponsor
- Folmer · Cosponsor
- Scott E. Hutchinson · Cosponsor
- Mensch · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
- Lisa Baker · Primary
- Kim L. Ward · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 246 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lisa Baker Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican
- Folmer
- Scott E. Hutchinson Republican
- Mensch
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
- Kim L. Ward Republican
Not signed on (246)
246 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 246 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 516?
- SB 516 is sponsored by Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Folmer, Scott E. Hutchinson (Republican), Mensch, Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Lisa Baker (Republican), and Kim L. Ward (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 516?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 516?
- Track SB 516 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 516
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 516
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →