Pennsylvania 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 7 R · 2 D cosponsors

SR 48 — A Resolution directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a review of the compliance of telecommunication carriers with the high-speed broadband deployment mandates of the Public Utility Code and to report findings and recommendations to the Senate.

Last action — Adopted

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

258 added · 263 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the updated version of Bill SR 48, the language surrounding the audit of telecommunication carriers has been clarified. The term "conduct an audit" is changed to "conduct a review" for a more general approach, and the phrasing related to compliance with broadband service mandates is adjusted for consistency. These changes aim to ensure the audit remains thorough while making the language easier to understand, which is important for transparency and accountability in assessing broadband services in the state.

→
Previous
Latest
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
PRINTER'S NO.
657 PRINTER'S NO.
657 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION Session of No.
952 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION Session of No.
48 2019 INTRODUCED BY PHILLIPS-HILL, YAW, HUTCHINSON, COSTA, BAKER, AUMENT, STEFANO, WHITE, BROWNE, HAYWOOD AND BARTOLOTTA, APRIL 29, 2019 REFERRED TO COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, APRIL 29, 2019 A RESOLUTION Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct an audit on the compliance of telecommunication carriers with the Public Utility Code and high-speed broadband universal service deployment mandates and to report their findings and recommendations to the Senate.
48 2019 INTRODUCED BY PHILLIPS-HILL, YAW, HUTCHINSON, COSTA, BAKER, APRIL 29, 2019O, WHITE, BROWNE, HAYWOOD AND BARTOLOTTA, SENATOR PHILLIPS-HILL, COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, AS AMENDED, JUNE 12, 2019 A RESOLUTION Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct an audit on A REVIEW OF the compliance of <-- telecommunication carriers with the Public Utility Code and <-- high-speed broadband universal service deployment mandates OF <-- THE PUBLIC UTILITY CODE and to report their findings and <-- recommendations to the Senate.
and WHEREAS, In 1993, telecommunications carriers operating in <-- this Commonwealth adopted an alternative form of regulation and network modernization plans to replace existing copper-based network infrastructure with a hybrid of fiber optic and coaxial cables to deliver high-speed broadband at speeds of at least 45 megabits per second (Mbps) in both directions throughout 100% of their urban, suburban and rural service territories by the end of 2015;
and WHEREAS, In 1993, telecommunications carriers operating in this Commonwealth adopted an alternative form of regulation and network modernization plans to replace existing copper-based network infrastructure with a hybrid of fiber optic and coaxial cables to deliver high-speed broadband at speeds of at least 45 megabits per second (Mbps) in both directions throughout 100% of their urban, suburban and rural service territories by the end of 2015;
and WHEREAS, In March 2002, the PUC rejected the telecommunications carriers' third biennial update and concluded 20190SR0048PN0952 - 2 - that telecommunications carriers unilaterally changed the broadband commitment without properly notifying the PUC, stating that:
and WHEREAS, In March 2002, the PUC rejected the telecommunications carriers' third biennial update and concluded that telecommunications carriers unilaterally changed the 20190SR0048PN0657 - 2 - broadband commitment without properly notifying the PUC, stating that:
and WHEREAS, In July 2003, the PUC officially permitted 20190SR0048PN0952 - 3 - telecommunications carriers to break the commitment to the Commonwealth to deploy a 45 Mbps high-speed hybrid fiber optic and coaxial cable broadband network and replaced that commitment with a mandate to deploy broadband at a speed of 1.544 Mbps with the following benchmarks regarding each urban, suburban or rural exchange:
and WHEREAS, In July 2003, the PUC officially permitted telecommunications carriers to break the commitment to the 20190SR0048PN0657 - 3 - Commonwealth to deploy a 45 Mbps high-speed hybrid fiber optic and coaxial cable broadband network and replaced that commitment with a mandate to deploy broadband at a speed of 1.544 Mbps with the following benchmarks regarding each urban, suburban or rural exchange:
and WHEREAS, In July 2003, the PUC A PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY <-- COMMISSION (PUC) order also directed telecommunications carriers <-- to upgrade all central offices and existing remote terminals and construct new terminals to provide broadband service at 1.544 Mbps within five days of a customer request;
and WHEREAS, In July 2003, the PUC order also directed telecommunications carriers to upgrade all central offices and existing remote terminals and construct new terminals to provide broadband service at 1.544 Mbps within five days of a customer request;
20190SR0048PN0952 - 4 - (2) reducing the inflation offset under the companies' price cap form of rate regulation;
(2) reducing the inflation offset under the companies' 20190SR0048PN0657 - 4 - price cap form of rate regulation;
and (4) establishing several funds and programs to further facilitate broadband deployment beyond the deployment commitments contained in the CERTAIN companies' network <-- modernization plans, including:
and (4) establishing several funds and programs to further facilitate broadband deployment beyond the deployment commitments contained in the companies' network modernization plans, including:
and WHEREAS, In February 2005, this Commonwealth's LARGEST <-- telecommunications carriers CARRIER filed A revised network <-- modernization plans PLAN with the PUC to comply with Act 183 of <-- 2004;
and WHEREAS, In February 2005, this Commonwealth's telecommunications carriers filed revised network modernization plans with the PUC to comply with Act 183 of 2004;
and WHEREAS, The plans were PLAN WAS approved by order entered in <-- May 2005 to:
and WHEREAS, The plans were approved by order entered in May 2005 to:
(1) require the telecommunications carriers CARRIER to <-- retain their ITS commitment of broadband availability to 100% <-- of the total retail access lines by December 31, 2015, under the same benchmarks as outlined in the third supplement to their ITS network modernization plans PLAN approved by the <-- PUC in August 2004;
(1) require the telecommunications carriers to retain their commitment of broadband availability to 100% of the total retail access lines by December 31, 2015, under the same benchmarks as outlined in the third supplement to their network modernization plans approved by the PUC in August 2004;
and (2) allow telecommunications carriers THE CARRIER to <-- reduce the inflation offset of the ITS price stability <-- mechanism from 2.93% to 0.5% to generate additional funding dedicated to the deployment of high-speed broadband service 20190SR0048PN0952 - 5 - at 1.544 Mbps through urban, suburban and rural areas of their ITS service territories;
and (2) allow telecommunications carriers to reduce the inflation offset of the price stability mechanism from 2.93% to 0.5% to generate additional funding dedicated to the deployment of high-speed broadband service at 1.544 Mbps through urban, suburban and rural areas of their service territories;
<-- and WHEREAS, In December 2011, this Commonwealth's LARGEST <-- telecommunications carriers filed plans to announce their <-- intentions CARRIER FILED A PLAN PURSUANT TO STATUTE TO ANNOUNCE <-- ITS INTENTION to use other technologies, including fixed wireless, to meet the statutorily mandated broadband deployment benchmarks, stating their ITS commitment to inform the PUC about <-- deploying technologies to make broadband available to customers;
20190SR0048PN0657 - 5 - and WHEREAS, In December 2011, this Commonwealth's telecommunications carriers filed plans to announce their intentions to use other technologies, including fixed wireless, to meet the statutorily mandated broadband deployment benchmarks, stating their commitment to inform the PUC about deploying technologies to make broadband available to customers;
and WHEREAS, In February 2013, the PUC approved a final order and concluded that the PUC cannot specifically require 20190SR0048PN0952 - 6 - telecommunications carriers THE CARRIER to deploy DSL service to <-- meet the BFRR of the Greensburg CSA l125 customers or to set a specific price for the retail broadband access service offered those customers as part of the request;
and WHEREAS, In February 2013, the PUC approved a final order and concluded that the PUC cannot specifically require telecommunications carriers to deploy DSL service to meet the BFRR of the Greensburg CSA l125 customers or to set a specific price for the retail broadband access service offered those 20190SR0048PN0657 - 6 - customers as part of the request;
and WHEREAS, The largest telecommunications carrier's joint <-- venture agreement with its wireless affiliate changes a potential alternative provider of broadband service into the carrier's designated provider, which may constitute illegal cross-subsidization under 66 Pa.C.S.
and WHEREAS, The largest telecommunications carrier's joint venture agreement with its wireless affiliate changes a potential alternative provider of broadband service into the carrier's designated provider, which may constitute illegal cross-subsidization under 66 Pa.C.S.
and WHEREAS, The largest telecommunications carrier's customers who receive wireless broadband services to satisfy a BFRR are required to address any service or billing disputes with the wireless affiliate, further raising cross-subsidization concerns <-- because the carrier's wireless affiliate WHICH is an unregulated <-- provider of wireless competitive services and may or may not receive dedicated funding only for the benefit of the carrier's customers where broadband must be deployed, and the funding may or may not be used by the wireless affiliate to offer competitive wireless services to the general public;
and WHEREAS, The largest telecommunications carrier's customers who receive wireless broadband services to satisfy a BFRR are required to address any service or billing disputes with the wireless affiliate, further raising cross-subsidization concerns because the carrier's wireless affiliate is an unregulated provider of wireless competitive services and may or may not receive dedicated funding only for the benefit of the carrier's customers where broadband must be deployed, and the funding may or may not be used by the wireless affiliate to offer competitive wireless services to the general public;
and WHEREAS, The pricing for the wireless 4G LTE that is provided through the THIS Commonwealth's largest telecommunications <-- carrier's joint venture is affected by certain data usage caps and tiers, various equipment charges, service reliability issues and contract periods that may exceed the one-year contractual 20190SR0048PN0952 - 7 - term that is statutorily specified for the routine engagement of retail broadband access service under the BFRR process and could <-- be considered cost prohibitive to rural customers that lack access to alternative broadband service providers and who have paid increased telephone fees for decades to telecommunications carriers for the deployment of broadband services;
and WHEREAS, The pricing for the wireless 4G LTE that is provided through the Commonwealth's largest telecommunications carrier's joint venture is affected by certain data usage caps and tiers, various equipment charges, service reliability issues and contract periods that may exceed the one-year contractual term that is statutorily specified for the routine engagement of retail broadband access service under the BFRR process and could be considered cost prohibitive to rural customers that lack 20190SR0048PN0657 - 7 - access to alternative broadband service providers and who have paid increased telephone fees for decades to telecommunications carriers for the deployment of broadband services;
and WHEREAS, The Federal Communications Commission's Connect America Fund offered funding to this Commonwealth's largest telecommunications carrier to build new broadband network 20190SR0048PN0952 - 8 - infrastructure or upgrade networks in areas where it might not be as profitable, yet hundreds of millions of dollars in Connect America Funds have been declined by the carrier;
and WHEREAS, The Federal Communications Commission's Connect America Fund offered funding to this Commonwealth's largest telecommunications carrier to build new broadband network infrastructure or upgrade networks in areas where it might not be as profitable, yet hundreds of millions of dollars in Connect America Funds have been declined by the carrier;
therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Senate direct the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct an audit on A REVIEW OF the <-- compliance of telecommunication carriers with high-speed broadband universal service deployment mandates under the Public <-- Utility Code;
therefore be it 20190SR0048PN0657 - 8 - RESOLVED, That the Senate direct the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct an audit on the compliance of telecommunication carriers with high-speed broadband universal service deployment mandates under the Public Utility Code;
(1) determine whether telecommunications carriers have fulfilled their commitments under the Public Utility Code 66 <-- PA.C.S.
(1) determine whether telecommunications carriers have fulfilled their commitments under the Public Utility Code to accelerate broadband availability to 100% of their total retail access lines in their distribution networks by December 31, 2015;
CH.30 to accelerate broadband availability to 100% of their total retail access lines in their distribution networks by December 31, 2015;
20190SR0048PN0952 - 9 -
20190SR0048PN0657 - 9 -
View plain text versions (2)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Adopted

  2. PN 0952 Reported as amended

  3. PN 0657 Referred to COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 242 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (242)

242 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 242 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3000
Republican 5000
Democratic 3000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
AUMENT — Yea
IOVINO — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Timothy P. Kearney Democratic Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott E. Hutchinson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SR 48?
SR 48 is sponsored by Lisa Baker (Republican), Jay Costa (Democratic), Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Gene Yaw (Republican), Scott E. Hutchinson (Republican), Aument, Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Browne, Art Haywood (Democratic), Camera Bartolotta (Republican), and Daniel Laughlin (Republican).
What is the current status of SR 48?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SR 48?
Track SR 48 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SR 48

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SR 48

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →