Pennsylvania 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 5 R · 3 D cosponsors

SB 792 — An Act amending the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), known as the Automobile Lemon Law, further providing for definitions, for repair obligations, for manufacturer's duty for refund or replacement and for presumption of a reasonable number of attempts.

Last action — Referred to CONSUMER AFFAIRS

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

114 added · 77 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill SB 792 include the addition of definitions for "dual sport motorcycle," which are bikes designed for both on and off-road use, and clarify the manufacturer's obligations regarding refunds or replacements. Notably, the language was refined to specify what qualifies as a "new motor vehicle" and to explicitly include dual sport motorcycles in the definition, while removing previous wording about off-road vehicles. These changes help ensure that consumers have better protection and clarity when it comes to vehicle definitions and repair responsibilities, which is important for making informed purchases.

→
Previous
Latest
PRINTER'S NO.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
1093 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
1093 PRINTER'S NO.
2074 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
WARD, COSTA, COLLETT AND MUTH, JULY 8, 2019 REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, JULY 8, 2019 AN ACT Amending the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), entitled "An act relating to the rights of purchasers and lessees of defective new motor vehicles," further providing for definitions, for manufacturer's duty for refund or attempts.nt and for presumption of a reasonable number of The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
WARD, COSTA, COLLETT, MUTH AND BREWSTER, JULY 8, 2019 SENATOR TOMLINSON, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, AS AMENDED, OCTOBER 6, 2020 AN ACT Amending the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), entitled "An act relating to the rights of purchasers and lessees of defective new motor vehicles," further providing for definitions, FOR REPAIR OBLIGATIONS, for manufacturer's duty <-- for refund or replacement and for presumption of a reasonable number of attempts.
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
The definition of "new motor vehicle" in section 2 of the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), known as the Automobile Lemon Law, is amended and the section is amended by adding a definition to read:
The definition of "new motor vehicle" in section 2 of the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), known as the Automobile Lemon Law, is amended and the section is amended by adding a definition DEFINITIONS to read:
Section 2.
<-- Section 2.
* * * "DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLE." A MOTORCYCLE THAT IS DESIGNED TO BE <-- RIDDEN ON AND OFF ROAD THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE REGISTERED WITH THE DEPARTMENT.
The term includes motorcycles and does not include [motorcycles,] motor homes or off-road vehicles.
The term includes motorcycles and does not include [motorcycles,] motor homes [or], off-road vehicles OR DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLES DRIVEN OFF- <-- ROAD.
Section 5.
<-- SECTION 2.
SECTIONS 4(A) AND 5 OF THE ACT ARE AMENDED TO <-- READ:
SECTION 4.
REPAIR OBLIGATIONS.
(A) REPAIRS REQUIRED.--THE MANUFACTURER OF A NEW MOTOR VEHICLE SOLD OR LEASED AND REGISTERED IN THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL REPAIR OR CORRECT, AT NO COST TO THE PURCHASER, A NONCONFORMITY WHICH SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRS THE USE, VALUE OR SAFETY OF SAID MOTOR VEHICLE WHICH:
(1) IN THE CASE OF A MOTORCYCLE, MAY OCCUR WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACTUAL DELIVERY OF THE MOTORCYCLE TO THE PURCHASER OR DURING THE TERM OF THE WARRANTY, WHICHEVER MAY OCCUR FIRST;
OR 20190SB0792PN2074 - 2 - (2) IN THE CASE OF ANY OTHER NEW MOTOR VEHICLE, MAY OCCUR WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACTUAL DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE TO THE PURCHASER, WITHIN THE FIRST 12,000 MILES OF USE OR DURING THE TERM OF THE WARRANTY, WHICHEVER MAY FIRST OCCUR.
* * * Section 5.
A consumer shall not be entitled to a refund or 20190SB0792PN1093 - 2 - replacement if the nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value or safety of the vehicle or the nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or modification or alteration of the motor vehicle by the purchaser.
A consumer shall not be entitled to a refund or replacement if the nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value or safety of the vehicle or the nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or modification or alteration of the motor vehicle by the purchaser.
For purposes of this section, the phrase "modification or alteration by the purchaser" shall include, in relation to a motorcycle, a modification or alteration made after the date of actual delivery of the motorcycle to the purchaser.
For purposes of this section, the phrase "modification or alteration by the purchaser" shall include, in relation to a motorcycle, a modification or alteration made after the date of actual 20190SB0792PN2074 - 3 - delivery of the motorcycle to the purchaser.
Section 6(b) of the act is amended by adding a paragraph and the section is amended by adding a subsection to read:
Section 6(b) of the act is amended by adding a <-- paragraph and the section is amended by adding a subsection to read:
Section 6.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 6(A) AND (B) OF THE ACT ARE AMENDED BY <-- ADDING PARAGRAPHS AND THE SECTION IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SUBSECTION TO READ:
9 Section 6.
* * * (b) Time period extension.-- * * * (4) The minimum number of calendar days provided under subsection (a)(2) shall not apply to the period during which a motorcycle is being stored at a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility, either as a courtesy to the purchaser or for compensation, even if repairs to correct a nonconformity are made during the storage period.
* * * <-- (A) GENERAL RULE.--IT SHALL BE PRESUMED THAT A REASONABLE <-- NUMBER OF ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN TO REPAIR OR CORRECT A NONCONFORMITY IF:
* * * (3) FOR A MOTORCYCLE, MANUFACTURER-SOURCED PARTS HAVE BEEN USED IN THE ATTEMPTS TO REPAIR THE NONCONFORMITY.
(b) Time period extension.-- * * * (4) The minimum number of calendar days provided under subsection (a)(2) shall not apply to the period during which a motorcycle is being stored at a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility, either as a courtesy to the purchaser or for compensation, even if repairs to correct a nonconformity are made during the storage period.
(c) Applicability.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall only apply to a motorcycle if all attempts to correct a nonconformity are made by the same manufacturer's authorized service and repair 20190SB0792PN1093 - 3 - facility or if the purchaser provides a complete set of repair records, related to the nonconformity, to a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility that has not previously attempted to repair the nonconformity.
20190SB0792PN2074 - 4 - (c) Applicability.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall only apply to a motorcycle if all attempts to correct a nonconformity are made by the same manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility or if the purchaser provides a complete set of repair records, related to the nonconformity, to a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility that has not previously attempted to repair the nonconformity.
THE MANUFACTURER'S <-- AUTHORIZED SERVICE AND REPAIR FACILITY THAT PERFORMED THE REPAIRS SHALL PROVIDE AN AFFIDAVIT THAT THE NONCONFORMITY HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO REPAIR THREE TIMES.
20190SB0792PN1093 - 4 -
20190SB0792PN2074 - 5 -
View plain text versions (2)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Referred to CONSUMER AFFAIRS

  2. Third consideration and final passage

  3. Re-reported as committed

  4. Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS

  5. Second consideration

  6. First consideration

  7. PN 2074 Reported as amended

  8. PN 1093 Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 243 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (243)

243 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 243 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

FINAL PASSAGE

Passed 48 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 17000
Democratic 13001
Unaffiliated 18001
Total 48002
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
CORMAN — Yea
DINNIMAN — Yea
DISANTO — Yea
FARNESE — Yea
GORDNER — Yea
IOVINO — Yea
KILLION — Yea
LEACH — Not Voting
MENSCH — Yea
REGAN — Yea
SABATINA — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
YUDICHAK — Yea
ARNOLD — Yea
AUMENT — Yea
BLAKE — Yea
BREWSTER — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
Anthony H. Williams Democratic Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Not Voting
Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Katie J. Muth Democratic Yea
Lindsey M. Williams Democratic Yea
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Timothy P. Kearney Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
Wayne D. Fontana Democratic Yea
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Doug Mastriano Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Judy Ward Republican Yea
Kathleen C. Tomlinson Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Michele Brooks Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott E. Hutchinson Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Unaffiliated 8000
Democratic 7000
Total 24000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (24)
Member Party Vote
BLAKE — Yea
IOVINO — Yea
KILLION — Yea
MENSCH — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
CORMAN — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 4000
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 14000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
DINNIMAN — Yea
FARNESE — Yea
GORDNER — Yea
KILLION — Yea
REGAN — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Judy Ward Republican Yea
Kathleen C. Tomlinson Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 792?
SB 792 is sponsored by Jay Costa (Democratic), Kim L. Ward (Republican), Judy Ward (Republican), Michele Brooks (Republican), Gordner, Doug Mastriano (Republican), Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Maria Collett (Democratic), Katie J. Muth (Democratic), and Brewster.
What is the current status of SB 792?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 792?
Track SB 792 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 792

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 792

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →