SB 792 — An Act amending the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), known as the Automobile Lemon Law, further providing for definitions, for repair obligations, for manufacturer's duty for refund or replacement and for presumption of a reasonable number of attempts.
Last action — Referred to CONSUMER AFFAIRS
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
114 added · 77 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 792 include the addition of definitions for "dual sport motorcycle," which are bikes designed for both on and off-road use, and clarify the manufacturer's obligations regarding refunds or replacements. Notably, the language was refined to specify what qualifies as a "new motor vehicle" and to explicitly include dual sport motorcycles in the definition, while removing previous wording about off-road vehicles. These changes help ensure that consumers have better protection and clarity when it comes to vehicle definitions and repair responsibilities, which is important for making informed purchases.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
1093 THEPRINTER'S GENERALNO. ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
2074 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
WARD, COSTA, COLLETTCOLLETT, MUTH AND MUTH,BREWSTER, JULY 8, 2019 REFERREDSENATOR TOTOMLINSON, CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, JULYAS 8,AMENDED, 2019OCTOBER 6, 2020 AN ACT Amending the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), entitled "An act relating to the rights of purchasers and lessees of defective new motor vehicles," further providing for definitions, FOR REPAIR OBLIGATIONS, for manufacturer's duty <-- for refund or attempts.ntreplacement and for presumption of a reasonable number of Theattempts. General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
The definition of "new motor vehicle" in section 2 of the act of March 28, 1984 (P.L.150, No.28), known as the Automobile Lemon Law, is amended and the section is amended by adding a definition DEFINITIONS to read:
<-- Section 2.
* * * "DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLE." A MOTORCYCLE THAT IS DESIGNED TO BE <-- RIDDEN ON AND OFF ROAD THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE REGISTERED WITH THE DEPARTMENT.
The term includes motorcycles and does not include [motorcycles,] motor homes or[or], off-road vehicles.vehicles OR DUAL SPORT MOTORCYCLES DRIVEN OFF- <-- ROAD.
Section<-- 5.SECTION 2.
SECTIONS 4(A) AND 5 OF THE ACT ARE AMENDED TO <-- READ:
SECTION 4.
REPAIR OBLIGATIONS.
(A) REPAIRS REQUIRED.--THE MANUFACTURER OF A NEW MOTOR VEHICLE SOLD OR LEASED AND REGISTERED IN THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL REPAIR OR CORRECT, AT NO COST TO THE PURCHASER, A NONCONFORMITY WHICH SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRS THE USE, VALUE OR SAFETY OF SAID MOTOR VEHICLE WHICH:
(1) IN THE CASE OF A MOTORCYCLE, MAY OCCUR WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACTUAL DELIVERY OF THE MOTORCYCLE TO THE PURCHASER OR DURING THE TERM OF THE WARRANTY, WHICHEVER MAY OCCUR FIRST;
OR 20190SB0792PN2074 - 2 - (2) IN THE CASE OF ANY OTHER NEW MOTOR VEHICLE, MAY OCCUR WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACTUAL DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE TO THE PURCHASER, WITHIN THE FIRST 12,000 MILES OF USE OR DURING THE TERM OF THE WARRANTY, WHICHEVER MAY FIRST OCCUR.
* * * Section 5.
A consumer shall not be entitled to a refund or 20190SB0792PN1093 - 2 - replacement if the nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, value or safety of the vehicle or the nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or modification or alteration of the motor vehicle by the purchaser.
For purposes of this section, the phrase "modification or alteration by the purchaser" shall include, in relation to a motorcycle, a modification or alteration made after the date of actual 20190SB0792PN2074 - 3 - delivery of the motorcycle to the purchaser.
Section 6(b) of the act is amended by adding a <-- paragraph and the section is amended by adding a subsection to read:
SectionSECTION 6.3.
SECTION 6(A) AND (B) OF THE ACT ARE AMENDED BY <-- ADDING PARAGRAPHS AND THE SECTION IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SUBSECTION TO READ:
9 Section 6.
* * * (b)<-- Time(A) periodGENERAL extension.--RULE.--IT *SHALL *BE *PRESUMED (4)THAT TheA minimumREASONABLE number<-- ofNUMBER calendarOF daysATTEMPTS providedHAVE underBEEN subsectionUNDERTAKEN (a)(2)TO shallREPAIR notOR applyCORRECT toA theNONCONFORMITY periodIF: during which a motorcycle is being stored at a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility, either as a courtesy to the purchaser or for compensation, even if repairs to correct a nonconformity are made during the storage period.
* * * (3) FOR A MOTORCYCLE, MANUFACTURER-SOURCED PARTS HAVE BEEN USED IN THE ATTEMPTS TO REPAIR THE NONCONFORMITY.
(b) Time period extension.-- * * * (4) The minimum number of calendar days provided under subsection (a)(2) shall not apply to the period during which a motorcycle is being stored at a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility, either as a courtesy to the purchaser or for compensation, even if repairs to correct a nonconformity are made during the storage period.
20190SB0792PN2074 - 4 - (c) Applicability.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall only apply to a motorcycle if all attempts to correct a nonconformity are made by the same manufacturer's authorized service and repair 20190SB0792PN1093 - 3 - facility or if the purchaser provides a complete set of repair records, related to the nonconformity, to a manufacturer's authorized service and repair facility that has not previously attempted to repair the nonconformity.
THE MANUFACTURER'S <-- AUTHORIZED SERVICE AND REPAIR FACILITY THAT PERFORMED THE REPAIRS SHALL PROVIDE AN AFFIDAVIT THAT THE NONCONFORMITY HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO REPAIR THREE TIMES.
20190SB0792PN109320190SB0792PN2074 - 45 -
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Referred to CONSUMER AFFAIRS
-
Third consideration and final passage
-
Re-reported as committed
-
Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS
-
Second consideration
-
First consideration
-
PN 2074 Reported as amended
-
PN 1093 Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE
Sponsors
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Kim L. Ward · Cosponsor
- Judy Ward · Cosponsor
- Michele Brooks · Primary
- Gordner · Cosponsor
- Doug Mastriano · Cosponsor
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
- Maria Collett · Cosponsor
- Katie J. Muth · Cosponsor
- Brewster · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 243 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michele Brooks Republican
Co-sponsors (9)
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Kim L. Ward Republican
- Judy Ward Republican
- Gordner
- Doug Mastriano Republican
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
- Maria Collett Democratic
- Katie J. Muth Democratic
- Brewster
Not signed on (243)
243 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 243 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| DINNIMAN | — | Yea |
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| FARNESE | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| IOVINO | — | Yea |
| KILLION | — | Yea |
| LEACH | — | Not Voting |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| YUDICHAK | — | Yea |
| ARNOLD | — | Yea |
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| BLAKE | — | Yea |
| BREWSTER | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| Anthony H. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BLAKE | — | Yea |
| IOVINO | — | Yea |
| KILLION | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| DINNIMAN | — | Yea |
| FARNESE | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| KILLION | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 792?
- SB 792 is sponsored by Jay Costa (Democratic), Kim L. Ward (Republican), Judy Ward (Republican), Michele Brooks (Republican), Gordner, Doug Mastriano (Republican), Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Maria Collett (Democratic), Katie J. Muth (Democratic), and Brewster.
- What is the current status of SB 792?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 792?
- Track SB 792 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 792
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 792
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →