Break or Enter Pharmacy/Increase Penalty.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 212 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 212.
You're tracking HB 212
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 212 — Break or Enter Pharmacy/Increase Penalty.
Last action — Reptd Fav Com Substitute
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
19 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill HB 212 broadens the offense definitions beyond just opioids by defining the crime as breaking into a pharmacy with the intent to steal any "controlled substance," rather than only opioids. Additionally, it clarifies the penalties by specifying the nature of the property involved in the additional offense, changing "property" to explicitly include any controlled substance that is stolen. These changes may help law enforcement more effectively address a wider range of drug-related thefts and ensure consistent legal consequences for those involved in such crimes.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019 H 12 HOUSE BILL 212* Committee Substitute Favorable 3/13/19 Short Title:
Representatives Sasser, C.
Smith, Murphy, and Horn (Primary Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Judiciary, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House February 28, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO INCREASE THE PUNISHMENT FOR BREAKING AND ENTERING A PHARMACY.
– ForThe purposesfollowing ofdefinitions thisapply section,to thethis termsection: "pharmacy" is a business that has a pharmacy permit under G.S.
(1) Pharmacy.
– A business that has a pharmacy permit under G.S.
(2) Controlled substance.
– As defined in G.S.
90-87(5).
– A person who breaks or enters a pharmacy with the intent to commit thea theftlarceny of opioidsa controlled substance is guilty of a Class D felony.
– Unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, a person iswho guilty of a Class F felony if the person receives or possesses any propertycontrolled thatsubstance has been stolen duringin the commission of a violation of subsection (b) of this sectionsection, while knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the propertycontrolled substance was stolen, is stolen.guilty of a Class F felony.
– Any interest a person has acquired or maintained in property obtained in violation of this section shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to the procedures for forfeiture as set outforth in G.S.
18B-504."90-112." SECTION 2.
*H212-v-1**H212-v-2*
Compared against the N.C. General Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill introduces a new felony offense for breaking and entering a pharmacy to steal opioids and modifies existing forfeiture laws to include violations of this offense.
-
§ 14-54.2
Breaking or entering a pharmacy. (a) Definition. – For purposes of this section, the term 'pharmacy' is a business that has a pharmacy permit under G.S. 90-85.21. (b) Offense. – A person who breaks or enters a pharmacy with the intent to commit the theft of opioids is guilty of a Class D felony. (c) Additional Offense. – Unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, a person is guilty of a Class F felony if the person receives or possesses any property that has been stolen during the commission of a violation of subsection (b) of this section while knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the property is stolen. (d) Forfeiture. – Any interest a person has acquired or maintained in violation of this section shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to the procedures for forfeiture set out in G.S. 18B-504.
Creates a new law to penalize the breaking and entering of pharmacies with a specific focus on opioid theft.
-
G.S. 18B-504
Any interest a person has acquired or maintained in violation of this section shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to the procedures for forfeiture set out in G.S. 18B-504.
Specifies that interests acquired in violation of the new pharmacy break-in law are subject to forfeiture.
Action History
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Judiciary, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Sasser · Primary
- Murphy · Primary
- Horn · Cosponsor
- William D. Brisson · Cosponsor
- Cleveland · Cosponsor
- Hanig · Cosponsor
- McNeill · Cosponsor
- C. Smith · Primary
- Dennis Riddell · Cosponsor
- Larry C. Strickland · Cosponsor
- Wray · Cosponsor
- Sarah Stevens · Cosponsor
- Brenden H. Jones · Cosponsor
- Chris Humphrey · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 165 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Sasser
- Murphy
- C. Smith
Co-sponsors (11)
- Horn
- William D. Brisson Republican
- Cleveland
- Hanig
- McNeill
- Dennis Riddell Republican
- Larry C. Strickland Republican
- Wray
- Sarah Stevens Republican
- Brenden H. Jones Republican
- Chris Humphrey Republican
Not signed on (165)
165 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 165 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 212?
- HB 212 is sponsored by Sasser, Murphy, Horn, William D. Brisson (Republican), Cleveland, Hanig, McNeill, C. Smith, Dennis Riddell (Republican), Larry C. Strickland (Republican), Wray, Sarah Stevens (Republican), Brenden H. Jones (Republican), and Chris Humphrey (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 212?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 212?
- Track HB 212 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 212
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 212
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →