SB 271 — Durham Speed Device Pilot/School Zones.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Senate Bill 271, some administrative details about its filing and identification have been removed, and new lines have been added to clarify the session information. These changes mainly streamline the document, making it clearer and more straightforward. This matters because it improves the bill's readability, which can help lawmakers and the public better understand its purpose and intent.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA MarSESSION 14, 2019 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 271 Short Title:
271 SESSION 2019 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS45095-MWf-24 Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate March 18, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF DURHAM TO ESTABLISH A PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SPEED-MEASURING SYSTEMS TO DETECT SPEED LIMIT VIOLATIONS IN SCHOOL ZONES.
*DRS45095-MWf-24**S271-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 (3) The date, time, and location of the violation.
Page 2 DRS45095-MWf-24Senate Bill 271-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 SECTION 13.
DRS45095-MWf-24Senate Bill 271-First Edition Page 3
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- McKissick · Primary
- Woodard · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 177 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- McKissick
Co-sponsors (1)
- Woodard
Not signed on (177)
177 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 177 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 271?
- SB 271 is sponsored by McKissick and Woodard.
- What is the current status of SB 271?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 271?
- Track SB 271 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 271
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 271
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →