Fair Contracts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 569 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 569.
You're tracking SB 569
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 569 — Fair Contracts.
Last action — Withdrawn From Cal
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
46 added · 40 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill's title has been updated from "Contractor/Designer Fair Contracting" to "Fair Contracts," which broadens its focus. Additionally, the scope of protection has been adjusted to specifically guard the interests of designers, especially small and minority-owned businesses, rather than including all contractors and designers. This change emphasizes a more targeted approach to combat unfair contracting practices that disproportionately affect these smaller entities, which is crucial for promoting equity within the industry.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019 S 12 SENATE BILL 569* Judiciary Committee Substitute Adopted 4/30/19 Short Title:
Contractor/Designer Fair Contracting.Contracts.
Senator Newton (Primary Sponsor).
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 4, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROTECT THE INTERESTINTERESTS OF CONTRACTORS AND DESIGNERS, AND PARTICULARLY SMALL AND WMBE ENTITIES, FROM UNFAIR CONTRACTING AND DUTY TO DEFEND REQUIREMENTS.REQUIREMENTS THAT VIOLATE THE EXISTING PUBLIC POLICY OF NORTH CAROLINA.
(a) Any promise or agreement in, or in connection with, a contract contract, promise, or agreement relative to the design, planning, construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of a building, structure, highway, road, appurtenance or appliance, including moving, demolition and excavating connected therewith, purporting to indemnify or hold harmless the promisee, the promisee's independent contractors, agents, employees, or indemnitees anyother person or entity against liability for damages arising out of (i) bodily injury to persons or persons, (ii) damage to property property, (iii) economic damages, or (iv) losses or expenses of any type, including attorneys' fees, proximately caused by or resulting from the negligence, in whole or in part, of the promisee, its independent contractors, agents, employees, or indemnitees,anyindemnitees, other person or entity is against public policy and is void and unenforceable.
(b) Nothing contained in this section shall prevent or prohibit a Any contract, promise or agreement whereby described in subsection (a) of this section may only require that a promisor shall indemnifyorindemnify or hold harmless anypromiseeany promisee or thepromisee'sthe promisee's independent contractors,agents,contractors, agents, employees or indemnitees against liabilityforliability for damages arising out of (i) bodilyinjury to persons, (ii) damage to property, (iii) economic damages, or (iv) losses or expenses of any type, including attorneys' fees, proximatelycaused by or resulting from the sole negligence negligence, in whole or in part, of the promisor, its agents or employees.
(c)(b) InAny anypromise contract, promise, or agreement describedin, in subsectionsconnection (a)with, andor (b)collateral ofto thisa sectioncontract relativeor toagreement designfor engineering, architectural, landscape architectural, or planning,surveying theservices obligationpurporting to indemnifyrequire orthat holdone harmlessparty shallto notthe includeagreement anindemnify, obligationhold toharmless, or defend the promisee,other theparty, promisee'sits independent contractors, agents, employees, or any other person or entity.entity, against liability or claims for damages, losses, or expenses, including attorneys' fees, is against public policy and is void and unenforceable, except for a promise or agreement providing only for indemnification for damages or expenses to the extent resulting from the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the promisor, its employees, agents, or other persons utilized by the promisor in the performance of the contract.
An(c) obligationThis tosection defend shall not beaffect imposedan byinsurance contract, workers' compensation, or any other termsagreement ofissued theby contract,an promise,insurer, ornor agreement.shall this section apply to promises insurer.
(d) ThisSubsection section(a) shallof not affect an insurance contract, workers' compensation, or any otheragreement issued byan insurer,norshall this section applytoshall promisesnot oragreementsapply underto whichany aof publicthe utilityfollowing: as defined in G.S.
62-3(23)(1) includingPromises or agreements under which a railroadpublic corporationutility as andefined indemnitee.in G.S.
This62-3(23) section shall not apply to contracts entered into by the Department of Transportation pursuant to G.S.
136-28.1.insurer."62-3(23)a. SECTION 2.
including a railroad corporation as is an indemnitee.
*S569-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 (2) This section shall not apply to contracts Contracts entered into by the Department of Transportation pursuant to G.S.
136-28.1." SECTION 2.
*S569-v-1*Page 2 Senate Bill 569*-Second Edition
Action History
-
Withdrawn From Cal
-
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Withdrawn From Cal
-
Placed On Cal For 05/06/2019
-
Reptd Fav
-
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Com Substitute Adopted
-
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Withdrawn From Com
-
Re-ref to Judiciary. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Newton · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Newton
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 569?
- SB 569 is sponsored by Newton.
- What is the current status of SB 569?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 569?
- Track SB 569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 569
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 569
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →