Regional School Enrollment Requirements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 659 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 659.
You're tracking SB 659
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 659 — Regional School Enrollment Requirements.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised bill now focuses solely on a proportional allotment of seats for students at a regional school, rather than ensuring an equal number of seats for each participating unit. Specifically, it eliminates a requirement that at least 50% of the available seats be equally shared, allowing for a more flexible distribution based on student population. This change matters because it could better reflect the actual enrollment trends in different areas, ensuring that seats are allocated based on demand rather than a fixed distribution, which may lead to more efficient use of resources.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019 S 12 SENATE BILL 659 Corrected Copy 5/16/19 Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 4, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE ANPROPORTIONAL EQUALALLOTMENT NUMBER OF SEATS FOR EACH PARTICIPATING UNIT IN A REGIONAL SCHOOLSCHOOL. FOR AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT OF THE AVAILABLE SEATS WITH THE REMAINING AVAILABLE SEATS ALLOTTED PROPORTIONATE TO STUDENT POPULATION OF EACH UNIT.
– The number of student seats in the freshman class of the regional school shall be allottedapportioned inaccording anto equalthe amountaverage fordaily eachmembership enrollment of participating unitunits, fornot atto leastexceed fiftyten percent (50%)(10%) above of the availablepercentage seats.of representation assigned proportionate to the total student population of the participating units, as determined by the participating unit's final average daily membership in the preceding school year.
After the initial allotment under this subsection, the remaining available seats shall be assigned proportionate to the total student population of the participating units, as determined by the participating unit's final average daily membership in the preceding school year.
ThisNotwithstanding act is effective when it becomes law and applies with a freshman class entering a regional school for the 2019-2020last schoolsentence yearof andG.S. each subsequent school year.
*S659-v-1*115C-238.67(b), until the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee makes recommendations on statutory changes to G.S.
115C-238.67(b), once the number of student seats in the freshman class of the regional school have been assigned proportionate to the total student population of the participating units, if fewer students residing in a participating unit elect to attend the regional school than available allotted seats, the remaining seats shall not be divided proportionally among the other participating units.
SECTION 3.
This act is effective when it becomes law and applies with a freshman class entering a regional school for the 2019-2020 school year and each subsequent school year and the apportionment for offset of average daily membership for district enrollment.
*S659-v-2*
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Kandie D. Smith · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kandie D. Smith Democratic
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 659?
- SB 659 is sponsored by Kandie D. Smith (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 659?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 659?
- Track SB 659 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 659
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 659
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →