North Carolina 2019-2020 Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 2 R · 1 D · 1 I cosponsors

HB 561 — Strengthen Dangerous Dog Laws.

Last action — Regular Message Received From House

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

170 added · 33 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Bill HB 561 clarify the definition and procedures for dealing with "dangerous dogs." One major adjustment includes a new structure for how dogs are classified as potentially dangerous, specifying that a single person or board must determine this status and handle appeals, creating a more streamlined process for dog owners. This update is significant because it enhances the accountability of animal control authorities and provides clearer guidelines for dog owners, which can help ensure public safety and fair treatment in cases involving dogs that exhibit aggressive behaviors.

→
Previous
Latest
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019 H 1 HOUSE BILL 561 Short Title:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2019 H 2 HOUSE BILL 561 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/30/19 Short Title:
Representative Torbett.
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Stateand Local Government, iffavorable,Judiciary, if favorable,Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House April 4, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR VICTIMS OF DANGEROUS DOGS.
April 4, 2019 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR VICTIMS OF DANGEROUS DOGS.
67-4.1(c) reads as rewritten:
67-4.1(c) is recodified as G.S.
"(c) The county or municipal authority responsible for animal control shall designate a person or a Board to be responsible for determining when a dog is a "potentially dangerous dog" and shall designate a separate Board to hear any appeal.
67-4.1A, to be captioned "Procedures for determination." SECTION 2.
The person or Board making the determination that a dog is a "potentially dangerous dog" must impound the dog and notify the owner in writing, giving the reasons for the determination, before the dog may be considered potentially dangerous under this Article.
Article 1A of Chapter 67 of the General Statutes, as amended by this act, reads as rewritten:
The owner may appeal the determination by filing written objections with the appellate Board within three days.
"Article 1A.
The appellate Board shall schedule a hearing within 10 days of the filing of the objections.
"Dangerous Dogs.
Any appeal from the final decision of such appellate Board shall be taken to the superior court by filing notice of appeal and a petition for review within 10 days of the final decision of the appellate Board.
"§ 67-4.1.
Definitions and procedures.applicability.
(a) As used in this Article, unless the context clearly requires otherwise and except as modified in subsection (b) of this section, the term:
(1) "Dangerous dog" means any of the following:
a.
A dog that:
1.
Without that without provocation has killed or inflicted severe injury on a person;
orperson.
2.
Is determined by the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control to be potentially dangerous because the dog has engaged in one or more of the behaviors listed in subdivision (2) of this subsection.
b.
Any A dog owned or harbored primarily or in part for the purpose of dog fighting,fighting.
c.
or any A dog trained for dog fighting.
(2) "Potentially dangerous dog" means a dog that the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control determines to have:has done any of the following:
a.
Inflicted a bite on a person that resulted in broken bones or disfiguring lacerations or required cosmetic surgery or hospitalization;
orhospitalization.
b.
Killed or inflicted severe injury upon a domestic animal when not on the owner's real property;
orproperty.
c.
Approached a person when not on the owner's property in a vicious or terrorizing manner in an apparent attitude of attack.
*H561-v-2* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 (3) "Owner" means any person or legal entity that has a possessory property right in a dog.
(4) "Owner'srealproperty" meansanyrealpropertyownedorleasedbytheowner of the dog, but does not include any public right-of-way or a common area of a condominium, apartment complex, or townhouse development.
(5) "Severe injury" means any physical injury to a person or domestic animal that results in broken bones or disfiguring lacerations or required cosmetic surgery or hospitalization.surgery, hospitalization, or an overnight stay at a veterinary facility.
(b) The provisions of this Article do not apply to:to any of the following:
(1) A dog being used by a law enforcement officer to carry out the law enforcement officer's official duties;duties.
(2) A dog being used in a lawful hunt;hunt.
(3) A dog where the injury or damage inflicted by the dog was sustained by a domestic animal while the dog was working as a hunting dog, herding dog, or predator control dog on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper, and the damage or injury was to a species or type of domestic animal appropriate to the work of the dog;
Show all 98 changed rows (58 more)
Previous
Latest
ordog.
(4) A dog where the injury inflicted by the dog was sustained by a person who, at the time of the injury, was committing a willful trespass or other tort, was tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog, had tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog, or was committing or attempting to commit a crime.
"§ 67-4.1A.
Procedures for determination.
(a) The county or municipal authority responsible for animal control shall designate a person or a Board to be responsible for determining when a dog is a "dangerous dog" or a "potentially dangerous dog" and shall designate a separate Board to hear any appeal.
The person or Board making the determination that a dog is a "dangerous dog" or a "potentially dangerous dog" must notify the owner in writing, giving the reasons for the determination, before the dog may be considered dangerous or potentially dangerous under this Article.
(b) The owner may appeal the determination by filing written objections with the appellate Board within three business days.
The appellate Board shall schedule a hearing within 10 business days of the filing of the objections.
Any appeal from the final decision of such appellate Board shall be taken to the superior court by filing notice of appeal and a petition for review within 10 business days of the final decision of the appellate Board.
The appeal shall be heard de novo before asuperior courtjudgesittingin thecountyin which theappellateBoardwhoseruling isbeingappealedislocated.
The appeal shall be heard de novo before asuperior courtjudgesittingin thecountyin which theappellateBoardwhoseruling is being appealed is located.
Ifthepotentiallydangerousdogdeterminationisupheldortheowner of the dog does not appeal the determination, the dog shall be returned to the owner only upon (i) the owner paying the costs of the impoundment and (ii) the person or Board that made the "potentially dangerous dog" determination finding that the owner's confinement of the animal meets the requirements of G.S.
(c) In cases where a dog has killed or inflicted severe injury to a person or domestic animal, the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for making determinations under subsection (a) of this section shall impound the dog.
67-4.2(a)(1)." SECTION 2.
In all other cases, the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority as responsible for making determinations shall decide whether a dog, following notice to the owner in writing with the reasons for the determination of dangerous or potentially dangerous, should be impounded.
G.S.
If the dog is impounded, and the dog is determined to be dangerous or potentially dangerous, the owner of the dog is responsible for paying the impoundment fees, unless that determination is overturned on appeal.
67-4.3 reads as rewritten:
(d) If a dog is impounded pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control shall continue the impoundment through the following:
(1) During the pendency of the appeal, including any judicial appeals.
Page 2 House Bill 561-Second Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 (2) Until the determination has been overturned on appeal or the owner has satisfied all restraint requirements in G.S.
67-4.2(a)(1), satisfied any applicable local ordinances related to restraint of the dog, and paid any fees imposed for the costs of impoundment or entered into an agreement regarding a payment plan.
(e) If a dog is impounded pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, and the initial determination that the dog is dangerous or potentially dangerous is overturned on appeal, the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control shall promptly return the dog to the owner.Theownershall not bechargedorrequired to reimbursethecountyormunicipal authority for any costs related to the impoundment.
(f) If a dog has been impounded pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, the following shall apply to relinquishment of ownership of the dog:
(1) The owner of the dog shall be deemed to relinquish ownership of the dog to the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control if any of the following occur:
a.
The owner of the dog fails to pay impoundment fees or enter into a payment plan as required by subsection (d) of this section within a reasonable amount of time, as set bythe countyor municipal authority responsible for animal control, following the date the determination is upheld or the period for appealing the determination is exhausted.
b.
The owner of the dog fails to provide for the restraint of the dog on the owner's real property pursuant to G.S.
67-4.2(a)(1) and any applicable requirements adopted by local ordinance pursuant to G.S.
67-4.5 within a reasonable amount of time, as set by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control.
(2) Thecountyormunicipalauthorityresponsiblefor animal control shall provide the owner with written notice regarding the amount of time the owner has to satisfy the requirements related to restraint and payment.
(3) If the owner has not satisfied the requirements within the specific time, the county or municipal authority shall provide written notice to the owner explaining that the owner's rights will be relinquished and specifying the effective date of the relinquishment.
The effective date must be at least five business days after the date the notice is either mailed or hand-delivered.
(4) The owner of the dog may voluntarily grant a possessory right in the dog to the countymunicipal authorityresponsible for animal control at anytime.
The decision to voluntarily relinquish ownership of the dog shall be documented in writing.
(g) A dog determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog pursuant to this section or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to G.S.
67-4.5 shall be determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog in each county in this State.
"§ 67-4.2.
Precautions against attacks by dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs.
(a) It is unlawful for an owner of a dog determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog, upon final determination as provided in G.S.
67-4.1A, to:
(1) Leave a dangerous the dog unattended on the owner's real property unless the dog is confined indoors, in a securely enclosed and locked pen, or in another structure designed to restrain the dog;dog.
(2) Permit a dangerous the dog to go beyond the owner's real property unless the dog is leashed and muzzled or is otherwise securely restrained and muzzled.
(b) If the owner of a dog determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog, upon final determination as provided in G.S.
67-4.1A, transfers ownership or possession of House Bill 561-Second Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2019 the dog to another person (as defined in G.S.
12-3(6)), the owner shall provide written notice to:to the following:
(1) The county or municipal authority responsible for animal control that made the determination under this Article, stating the name and address of the new owner or possessor of the dog;
anddog.
(2) The person taking ownership or possession of the dog, specifying the dog's dangerous or potentially dangerous behavior and the authority's determination.
(c) Violation of this section is a Class 3 misdemeanor.
Penalty for attacks by dangerous dogs.
Penalty for attacks by dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs.
The owner of a dangerous dog that attacks a person and causes physical injuries requiring medical treatment in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) or attacks and kills a dog under the immediate control of a person shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
(a) The owner of a dog determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog, upon final determination as provided in G.S.
For purposes of this section, "under the immediate control of a person" shall mean on a leash or held in the arms of the person." SECTION 3.
67-4.1A, that attacks a person and causes physical injuries requiring medical treatment in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) or attacks and kills a domestic animal under the immediate control of a person shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
(b) For purposes of this section, "under the immediate control of a person" shall mean on a leash or held in the arms of the person.
"§ 67-4.4.
Strict liability.
The owner of a dog determined to be a dangerous dog or a potentially dangerous dog, upon final determination as provided in G.S.
67-4.1A, shall be strictly liable in civil damages for any injuries or property damage the dog inflicts upon a person, his the person's property, or another animal.
"§ 67-4.5.
Local ordinances.
Nothing in this Article shall be construed to prevent affect the authority of a city or county from adopting or enforcing its own program for to impose additional requirements on the control of dangerous dogs.dogs or potentially dangerous dogs by local ordinance." SECTION 3.
*H561-v-1*
Page 4 House Bill 561-Second Edition
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Regular Message Received From House

  2. Passed 1st Reading

  3. Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate

  4. Regular Message Sent To Senate

  5. Passed 2nd Reading

  6. Passed 3rd Reading

  7. Reptd Fav

  8. Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)

  9. Placed On Cal For 05/02/2019

  10. Reptd Fav Com Substitute

  11. Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  12. Reptd Fav

  13. Re-ref Com On Judiciary

  14. Passed 1st Reading

  15. Ref to the Com on State and Local Government, if favorable, Judiciary, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House

  16. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 174 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (174)

174 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 174 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Second Reading

Passed 105 Yea · 8 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 20401
Republican 30003
Unaffiliated 53403
U 2000
Total 105807
% of votes cast 88%7%0%6%
How each member voted (120)
Member Party Vote
Autry — Yea
Beasley — Yea
Black — Yea
Brewer — Yea
Clemmons — Yea
Farmer-Butterfield — Yea
Floyd — Yea
Garrison — Yea
Gill — Yea
Graham — Yea
Harris — Yea
Holley — Yea
Hunt — Yea
Hunter — Yea
Insko — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Lucas — Yea
Montgomery — Yea
Queen — Yea
Richardson — Yea
Russell — Yea
Terry — Yea
vonHaefen — Yea
Wray — Yea
Boles — Yea
Bumgardner — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cleveland — Yea
Conrad — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dobson — Yea
Faircloth — Yea
Fraley — Yea
Grange — Yea
Hardister — Yea
Henson — Yea
Hurley — Yea
Lewis — Yea
McElraft — Yea
McGrady — Yea
McNeill — Yea
Moore — Yea
Presnell — Yea
Rogers — Yea
Saine — Yea
Sasser — Yea
Speciale — Yea
Szoka — Yea
Yarborough — Yea
Zachary — Yea
Fisher — Nay
Gailliard — Nay
Martin — Nay
Elmore — Nay
Horn — Not Voting
L. Johnson — Not Voting
Murphy — Not Voting
C. Smith — Yea
K. Smith — Yea
R. Smith — Yea
Allison A. Dahle Democratic Yea
Amos L. Quick, III Democratic Yea
Becky Carney Democratic Yea
Brandon Lofton Democratic Yea
Brian Turner Democratic Yea
Brian Turner Democratic Yea
Carolyn G. Logan Democratic Yea
Cecil Brockman Democratic Yea
Cynthia Ball Democratic Yea
Dante Pittman Democratic Yea
Deb Butler Democratic Yea
Eric Ager Democratic Yea
Gale Adcock Democratic Yea
Garland E. Pierce Democratic Yea
Graig Meyer Democratic Yea
Joe John Democratic Yea
Marcia Morey Democratic Nay
Mary Belk Democratic Yea
Pricey Harrison Democratic Nay
Robert T. Reives, II Democratic Not Voting
Shelly Willingham Democratic Yea
Sydney Batch Democratic Yea
Terence Everitt Democratic Nay
Tracy Clark Democratic Yea
Zack Hawkins Democratic Nay
Bobby Hanig Republican Yea
Brenden H. Jones Republican Yea
Chris Humphrey Republican Not Voting
Dean Arp Republican Yea
Dennis Riddell Republican Yea
Destin Hall Republican Yea
Donna McDowell White Republican Yea
Donny Lambeth Republican Yea
Edward C. Goodwin Republican Yea
Frank Iler Republican Yea
Harry Warren Republican Yea
Hugh Blackwell Republican Not Voting
Jay Adams Republican Yea
Jimmy Dixon Republican Yea
John A. Torbett Republican Yea
John R. Bell, IV Republican Yea
John Sauls Republican Not Voting
Julia C. Howard Republican Yea
Keith Kidwell Republican Yea
Kelly E. Hastings Republican Yea
Kevin Corbin Republican Yea
Kyle Hall Republican Yea
Larry C. Strickland Republican Yea
Larry W. Potts Republican Yea
Lisa S. Barnes Republican Yea
Mark Brody Republican Yea
Mitchell S. Setzer Republican Yea
Phil Shepard Republican Yea
Sarah Stevens Republican Yea
Stephen M. Ross Republican Yea
Steve Jarvis Republican Yea
W. Ted Alexander Republican Yea
William D. Brisson Republican Yea
Carla D. Cunningham U Yea
Nasif Majeed U Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 561?
HB 561 is sponsored by John A. Torbett (Republican), R. Smith, Shelly Willingham (Democratic), Nasif Majeed (U), and Edward C. Goodwin (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 561?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 561?
Track HB 561 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 561

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 561

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →