Burden of Proof - Planning and Zoning.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 642 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 642.
You're tracking SB 642
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 642 — Burden of Proof - Planning and Zoning.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 11 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate Bill 642 has removed some outdated or redundant references from the document, making it cleaner and easier to read. This change is important because it helps ensure that everyone can clearly understand the bill's intentions and provisions. Simplifying the language can also enhance transparency and improve the legislative process.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA AprSESSION 4, 2017 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 642 Short Title:
642 SESSION 2017 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS35274-MQ-95 (03/17) Short Title:
Jackson, and Brock (Primary Sponsors).Sponsors);
and J.
Davis.
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 5, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO PROVIDE REGULATORY RELIEF FOR LANDOWNERS BY ESTABLISHING A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF PROPER LAND USE UNDER THE ORDINANCE AND BY REQUIRING CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE TO REBUT THAT PRESUMPTION IN QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.
*DRS35274-MQ-95**S642-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 Absent an ordinance provision to the contrary, posting of signs shall not be required.
A majority of the members shall be required to decide any other quasi-judicial matter or to determine an appeal made in the nature of Page 2 DRS35274-MQ-95Senate [v.5]Bill (03/17)642-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 certiorari.
DRS35274-MQ-95Senate [v.5]Bill (03/17)642-First Edition Page 3
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brock · Cosponsor
- Newton · Primary
- Brent Jackson · Primary
- D. Davis · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 175 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Newton
- Brent Jackson Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Brock
- D. Davis
Not signed on (175)
175 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 175 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 642?
- SB 642 is sponsored by Brock, Newton, Brent Jackson (Republican), and D. Davis.
- What is the current status of SB 642?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 642?
- Track SB 642 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 642
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 642
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →