SB 665 — The I. Beverly Lake, Jr., Fair Trial Act.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
9 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Senate Bill 665 adds a specific section focused on jury instructions related to testimony from informants who are in custody. This change clarifies how juries should evaluate the credibility of such testimony, which can significantly impact court cases. This matters because it aims to ensure fairer trials by making juries more aware of the potential biases or motivations behind the statements of in-custody informants.
FILED SENATE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA AprSESSION 4, 2017 S.B.S 1 SENATE BILL 665 Short Title:
665 SESSION 2017 PRINCIPAL CLERK S D SENATE BILL DRS35278-MS-129C (03/22) Short Title:
Rules and Operations of the Senate April 5, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO INCREASE THE RELIABILITY OF IN-CUSTODY INFORMANT STATEMENTS.
(c) Jury Instruction Regarding In-Custody Informant TestimonyInTestimony. any case in which in-custody informant testimony is presented to the jury, the judge shall instruct the jury that the in-custody informant's testimony must be scrutinized with regard to reliability and that, in considering the reliability of the in-custody informant, the jury may consider any of the following:
In any case in which in-custody informant testimony is presented to the jury, the judge shall instruct the jury that the in-custody informant's testimony must be scrutinized with regard to reliability and that, in considering the reliability of the in-custody informant, the jury may consider any of the following:
*DRS35278-MS-129C**S665-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 (d) Policies and Procedures Governing the Recording and Use of Testimony.
Page 2 DRS35278-MS-129CSenate [v.2]Bill (03/17)665-First Edition
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Filed
Sponsors
- McKissick · Cosponsor
- Jr. Danny Earl Britt · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 177 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Danny Earl Britt, Jr. Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- McKissick
Not signed on (177)
177 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 177 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 665?
- SB 665 is sponsored by McKissick and Danny Earl Britt, Jr. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 665?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 665?
- Track SB 665 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 665
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 665
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →