Revisions to Outdoor Advertising Laws.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 173 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 173.
You're tracking HB 173
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 173 — Revisions to Outdoor Advertising Laws.
Last action — Passed 1st Reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
126 added · 124 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill HB 173 has been revised to clarify how compensation is determined when the Department of Transportation acquires property with outdoor advertising. It now explicitly states that if the property owner does not own the outdoor advertising, compensation will reflect only the change in the property's overall value. Conversely, if the property owner also owns the advertising, the compensation will include both the advertising's current fair market value and the change in the property's value. These changes aim to ensure fair compensation for property owners affected by such acquisitions.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA H.B.SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 173 Short Title:
173 Feb 22, 2017 SESSION 2017 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE BILL DRH30078-MLf-72E (02/07) Short Title:
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Commerce and Job Development, if favorable, Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Finance February 23, 2017 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO INCREASE PERMIT FEES FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, TO CLARIFY THE STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING JUST COMPENSATION IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMINENT DOMAIN ACTIONS THAT CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF LAWFULLY ERECTED OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, AND TO MAKE VARIOUS REVISIONS TO THE LAWS GOVERNING OUTDOOR ADVERTISING MODERNIZATION AND OUTDOOR ADVERTISING VEGETATION CUTTING OR REMOVAL.
In any acquisition, purchase or condemnation, just compensation to the owner of the outdoor advertising, where the owner of the outdoor advertising does not own the fee, shall be limited to the fair market value at the time of the taking of the outdoor advertising owner's interest in the real *H173-v-1* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 property on which the outdoor advertising is located and such value shall include the value of the outdoor advertising.
*DRH30078-MLf-72E* General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 In any acquisition, purchase or condemnation, just compensation to the owner of the fee or other interest in the real property upon which the outdoor advertising is located where said owner does not own the outdoor advertising located thereon shall be limited to the difference in the fair market value of the entire tract immediately before and immediately after the taking by the Department of Transportation of the right to maintain such outdoor advertising thereon and in arriving at the fair market value after the taking, any special or general benefits accruing to the property by reason of the acquisition shall be taken into consideration.
(b) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a municipality, county, local or regional zoning authority, or other political subdivision from using its zoning authority to regulate (i) the initial erection of outdoor advertising that has not been relocated pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or (ii) outdoor advertising in which a permit issued by the Department of Transportation Page 2 House Bill 173-First Edition General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 pursuant to this Article has been voluntarily cancelled or lawfully revoked, and any appeals under G.S.
No decision of an administrative official charged with Page 2 DRH30078-MLf-72E [v.3] (02/17) General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 enforcement of a local ordinance, rule, or regulation shall be effective against an owner or operator of outdoor advertising for any activity authorized by this section, and no appeal under G.S.
A selective vegetation removal permittee may relocate, and replace if necessary, any native dogwoods or native redbuds existing within the cut or removal zone established in subsection (a) of this section to a location within 2,500 feet on either side of the outdoor advertising structure, as measured along the edge of the House Bill 173-First Edition Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 pavement of the main travel way of the nearest controlled route.
If a native dogwood or native redbud cannot be preserved during relocation, a selective vegetation removal permittee shall DRH30078-MLf-72E [v.3] (02/17) Page 3 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2017 replace the native dogwood or native redbud with native dogwoods or native redbuds of the same cumulative caliper inches.
Page 4 DRH30078-MLf-72EHouse [v.3]Bill (02/17)173-First Edition
Action History
-
Passed 1st Reading
-
Ref to the Com on Commerce and Job Development, if favorable, Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Finance
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Yarborough · Cosponsor
- Wray · Cosponsor
- Steinburg · Cosponsor
- Phil Shepard · Primary
- Mitchell S. Setzer · Cosponsor
- Garland E. Pierce · Cosponsor
- McElraft · Primary
- Lucas · Cosponsor
- Hardister · Cosponsor
- Floyd · Cosponsor
- Dobson · Cosponsor
- Collins · Cosponsor
- Burr · Cosponsor
- S. Martin · Cosponsor
- IV John R. Bell · Primary
- IV John R. Bell · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Phil Shepard Republican
- McElraft
- John R. Bell, IV Republican
Co-sponsors (13)
- Yarborough
- Wray
- Steinburg
- Mitchell S. Setzer Republican
- Garland E. Pierce Democratic
- Lucas
- Hardister
- Floyd
- Dobson
- Collins
- Burr
- S. Martin
- John R. Bell, IV Republican
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 173?
- HB 173 is sponsored by Yarborough, Wray, Steinburg, Phil Shepard (Republican), Mitchell S. Setzer (Republican), Garland E. Pierce (Democratic), McElraft, Lucas, Hardister, Floyd, Dobson, Collins, Burr, S. Martin, and John R. Bell, IV (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 173?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 173?
- Track HB 173 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 173
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 173
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →